从瀑布式到协作式:课程设计过程如何随着关系构建而演变

Wan Ju Huang, K. Douglas, Tiantian Li, A. Fentiman
{"title":"从瀑布式到协作式:课程设计过程如何随着关系构建而演变","authors":"Wan Ju Huang, K. Douglas, Tiantian Li, A. Fentiman","doi":"10.14434/ijdl.v14i1.33768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the instructional design experiences and processes shared by a multi-disciplinary group—including more than a dozen faculty, staff, and students—while developing a series of online courses on Model-based Systems Engineering (MBSE) for professional engineers, a project sponsored by the National Science Foundation. The team size, the complexity and uniqueness of the subject matter, the targeted learners, and the pre-determined research questions created a rare situation in which the team members collaborated and/or negotiated outside the realm of the traditional instructional design process. Over time the team went through two different types of instructional design processes, beginning with a waterfall-type process where the communication between the subject matter experts (SME) and the design team was somewhat limited and finally evolving to a collaborative process where the interaction between the two teams was more direct and immediate. The evolution of the design process and the dynamics between the SMEs and the design team resulted in several major design revisions implemented to improve the quality of the online courses.","PeriodicalId":91509,"journal":{"name":"International journal of designs for learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Waterfall to Collaborative: How the Course Design Process Evolves Along with Relationship Building\",\"authors\":\"Wan Ju Huang, K. Douglas, Tiantian Li, A. Fentiman\",\"doi\":\"10.14434/ijdl.v14i1.33768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses the instructional design experiences and processes shared by a multi-disciplinary group—including more than a dozen faculty, staff, and students—while developing a series of online courses on Model-based Systems Engineering (MBSE) for professional engineers, a project sponsored by the National Science Foundation. The team size, the complexity and uniqueness of the subject matter, the targeted learners, and the pre-determined research questions created a rare situation in which the team members collaborated and/or negotiated outside the realm of the traditional instructional design process. Over time the team went through two different types of instructional design processes, beginning with a waterfall-type process where the communication between the subject matter experts (SME) and the design team was somewhat limited and finally evolving to a collaborative process where the interaction between the two teams was more direct and immediate. The evolution of the design process and the dynamics between the SMEs and the design team resulted in several major design revisions implemented to improve the quality of the online courses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of designs for learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of designs for learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v14i1.33768\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of designs for learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v14i1.33768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了包括十几名教职员工和学生在内的多学科群体在为专业工程师开发一系列基于模型的系统工程(MBSE)在线课程时共享的教学设计经验和过程,该项目由国家科学基金会赞助。团队规模、主题的复杂性和独特性、目标学习者以及预先确定的研究问题创造了一种罕见的情况,即团队成员在传统教学设计过程之外进行合作和/或协商。随着时间的推移,团队经历了两种不同类型的教学设计过程,从瀑布式过程开始,主题专家(SME)和设计团队之间的沟通在一定程度上受到限制,最后发展为协作过程,两个团队之间的互动更直接、更直接。设计过程的演变以及中小企业和设计团队之间的动态导致了几次重大的设计修订,以提高在线课程的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Waterfall to Collaborative: How the Course Design Process Evolves Along with Relationship Building
This paper discusses the instructional design experiences and processes shared by a multi-disciplinary group—including more than a dozen faculty, staff, and students—while developing a series of online courses on Model-based Systems Engineering (MBSE) for professional engineers, a project sponsored by the National Science Foundation. The team size, the complexity and uniqueness of the subject matter, the targeted learners, and the pre-determined research questions created a rare situation in which the team members collaborated and/or negotiated outside the realm of the traditional instructional design process. Over time the team went through two different types of instructional design processes, beginning with a waterfall-type process where the communication between the subject matter experts (SME) and the design team was somewhat limited and finally evolving to a collaborative process where the interaction between the two teams was more direct and immediate. The evolution of the design process and the dynamics between the SMEs and the design team resulted in several major design revisions implemented to improve the quality of the online courses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信