朱迪斯·巴特勒的哲学政治——《走向表演性集会理论的札记》——阿伦特、卡瓦雷罗与人的“显现”与“多元”

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Redescriptions Pub Date : 2018-09-01 DOI:10.7227/R.21.2.3
T. Pulkkinen
{"title":"朱迪斯·巴特勒的哲学政治——《走向表演性集会理论的札记》——阿伦特、卡瓦雷罗与人的“显现”与“多元”","authors":"T. Pulkkinen","doi":"10.7227/R.21.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyses Judith Butler’s Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly (2015), arguing that the volume can be read as presenting Butler’s politics of philosophy with respect to Hannah Arendt and Adriana Cavarero, and the existentialist philosophy of the human that they represent. The first part of the article introduces the approach of the “politics of philosophy,” and the rest of the article scrutinizes Butler’s use of two concepts, “appearing” and “plurality,” in the book, presenting how they shift into different meanings in Butler’s text in comparison to their charged philosophical meaning in Arendt and Cavarero. The article argues that Butler engages in “discharging” of these concepts of their existentialist philosophical charge, and that this gives evidence of her different philosophical choice. Instead of asking the existential philosophical question “what is a human being” in the omnitemporal philosophical tradition, Butler’s different philosophical starting point is in changing sociality, and she engages the tradition of philosophy in interventions in the here and now, asking “who counts as the human”.","PeriodicalId":33650,"journal":{"name":"Redescriptions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Judith Butler’s Politics of Philosophy in Notes Toward a\\n Performative Theory of Assembly – Arendt, Cavarero, and Human\\n “Appearing” and “Plurality”\",\"authors\":\"T. Pulkkinen\",\"doi\":\"10.7227/R.21.2.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyses Judith Butler’s Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly (2015), arguing that the volume can be read as presenting Butler’s politics of philosophy with respect to Hannah Arendt and Adriana Cavarero, and the existentialist philosophy of the human that they represent. The first part of the article introduces the approach of the “politics of philosophy,” and the rest of the article scrutinizes Butler’s use of two concepts, “appearing” and “plurality,” in the book, presenting how they shift into different meanings in Butler’s text in comparison to their charged philosophical meaning in Arendt and Cavarero. The article argues that Butler engages in “discharging” of these concepts of their existentialist philosophical charge, and that this gives evidence of her different philosophical choice. Instead of asking the existential philosophical question “what is a human being” in the omnitemporal philosophical tradition, Butler’s different philosophical starting point is in changing sociality, and she engages the tradition of philosophy in interventions in the here and now, asking “who counts as the human”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Redescriptions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Redescriptions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7227/R.21.2.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Redescriptions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7227/R.21.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文分析了朱迪斯·巴特勒(Judith Butler)的《走向表演集会理论的笔记》(Notes to a Performive Theory of Assembly)(2015),认为该卷可以解读为呈现了巴特勒关于汉娜·阿伦特(Hannah Arendt)和阿德里安娜·卡瓦雷罗(Adriana Cavarero)的哲学政治,以及他们所代表的人类存在主义哲学。文章的第一部分介绍了“哲学政治”的方法,文章的其余部分仔细审查了巴特勒在书中使用的“出现”和“多元”两个概念,与阿伦特和卡瓦雷罗的哲学意义相比,它们在巴特勒的文本中是如何转变为不同的意义的。文章认为,巴特勒参与了对这些存在主义哲学概念的“释放”,这为她不同的哲学选择提供了证据。巴特勒不同的哲学出发点是改变社会性,而不是在全时哲学传统中提出“人是什么”的存在主义哲学问题,她将哲学传统介入此时此地,询问“谁算人”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Judith Butler’s Politics of Philosophy in Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly – Arendt, Cavarero, and Human “Appearing” and “Plurality”
The article analyses Judith Butler’s Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly (2015), arguing that the volume can be read as presenting Butler’s politics of philosophy with respect to Hannah Arendt and Adriana Cavarero, and the existentialist philosophy of the human that they represent. The first part of the article introduces the approach of the “politics of philosophy,” and the rest of the article scrutinizes Butler’s use of two concepts, “appearing” and “plurality,” in the book, presenting how they shift into different meanings in Butler’s text in comparison to their charged philosophical meaning in Arendt and Cavarero. The article argues that Butler engages in “discharging” of these concepts of their existentialist philosophical charge, and that this gives evidence of her different philosophical choice. Instead of asking the existential philosophical question “what is a human being” in the omnitemporal philosophical tradition, Butler’s different philosophical starting point is in changing sociality, and she engages the tradition of philosophy in interventions in the here and now, asking “who counts as the human”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Redescriptions
Redescriptions Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信