高斯近似下不同解码技术对极化码性能的影响

Q4 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Hamizan Suhaimi, Nurul Syazlina Shuhaimi, R. Mohamad
{"title":"高斯近似下不同解码技术对极化码性能的影响","authors":"Hamizan Suhaimi, Nurul Syazlina Shuhaimi, R. Mohamad","doi":"10.11113/aej.v12.18358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last ten years, polar code research has piqued the interest of firms and researchers, particularly in the communication industry. Polar codes have been utilised as a coding method for the fifth-generation wireless standard (5G). However, the polar decoder does not adequately correct errors in successive cancellation (SC) decoding when dealing with short- to intermediate-length codes. However, SC decoding can correct errors more efficiently by using sequential cancellation list (SCL) decoding. The main drawback of SCL is its higher cost due to computational complexity and throughput. The present research investigates the effect of Gaussian approximation (GA) and different decoding approaches on the performance of polar codes. First, SC and SCL decoders are developed utilising amplitude shift keying modulation; a decoder using GA is then integrated. According to simulation data, the SCL, both with and without GA, exhibits a better block error rate (BLER) than SC. The maximum difference between the SCL decoder and SC decoder is 0.6 dB at BLER=0.1 for N=2048. Furthermore, at BLER=5.6 x 10-6, the SCL decoder with GA performs better than the SC decoder for block lengths, N=1024, with a maximum difference of 2.72 dB. When the polar decoder with GA is utilised, enhancements are observed in polar code performance for various list sizes and block lengths, although time complexity is increased.","PeriodicalId":36749,"journal":{"name":"ASEAN Engineering Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT DECODING TECHNIQUES WITH GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF POLAR CODES\",\"authors\":\"Hamizan Suhaimi, Nurul Syazlina Shuhaimi, R. Mohamad\",\"doi\":\"10.11113/aej.v12.18358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the last ten years, polar code research has piqued the interest of firms and researchers, particularly in the communication industry. Polar codes have been utilised as a coding method for the fifth-generation wireless standard (5G). However, the polar decoder does not adequately correct errors in successive cancellation (SC) decoding when dealing with short- to intermediate-length codes. However, SC decoding can correct errors more efficiently by using sequential cancellation list (SCL) decoding. The main drawback of SCL is its higher cost due to computational complexity and throughput. The present research investigates the effect of Gaussian approximation (GA) and different decoding approaches on the performance of polar codes. First, SC and SCL decoders are developed utilising amplitude shift keying modulation; a decoder using GA is then integrated. According to simulation data, the SCL, both with and without GA, exhibits a better block error rate (BLER) than SC. The maximum difference between the SCL decoder and SC decoder is 0.6 dB at BLER=0.1 for N=2048. Furthermore, at BLER=5.6 x 10-6, the SCL decoder with GA performs better than the SC decoder for block lengths, N=1024, with a maximum difference of 2.72 dB. When the polar decoder with GA is utilised, enhancements are observed in polar code performance for various list sizes and block lengths, although time complexity is increased.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASEAN Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASEAN Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.v12.18358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASEAN Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.v12.18358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的十年里,极性代码研究引起了公司和研究人员的兴趣,尤其是在通信行业。极化码已被用作第五代无线标准(5G)的编码方法。然而,当处理短到中等长度的码时,极性解码器不能充分地校正连续消除(SC)解码中的误差。然而,SC解码可以通过使用顺序消除列表(SCL)解码来更有效地校正错误。SCL的主要缺点是由于计算复杂性和吞吐量,其成本较高。本文研究了高斯近似和不同的译码方法对极性码性能的影响。首先,SC和SCL解码器是利用幅移键控调制开发的;然后集成使用GA的解码器。根据仿真数据,无论有没有GA,SCL都表现出比SC更好的块错误率(BLER)。当BLER=0.1时,当N=2048时,SCL解码器和SC解码器之间的最大差异为0.6dB。此外,在BLER=5.6×10-6时,对于块长度N=1024,具有GA的SCL解码器比SC解码器执行得更好,最大差值为2.72dB。当使用具有GA的极性解码器时,对于各种列表大小和块长度,观察到极性码性能的增强,尽管时间复杂性增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT DECODING TECHNIQUES WITH GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF POLAR CODES
In the last ten years, polar code research has piqued the interest of firms and researchers, particularly in the communication industry. Polar codes have been utilised as a coding method for the fifth-generation wireless standard (5G). However, the polar decoder does not adequately correct errors in successive cancellation (SC) decoding when dealing with short- to intermediate-length codes. However, SC decoding can correct errors more efficiently by using sequential cancellation list (SCL) decoding. The main drawback of SCL is its higher cost due to computational complexity and throughput. The present research investigates the effect of Gaussian approximation (GA) and different decoding approaches on the performance of polar codes. First, SC and SCL decoders are developed utilising amplitude shift keying modulation; a decoder using GA is then integrated. According to simulation data, the SCL, both with and without GA, exhibits a better block error rate (BLER) than SC. The maximum difference between the SCL decoder and SC decoder is 0.6 dB at BLER=0.1 for N=2048. Furthermore, at BLER=5.6 x 10-6, the SCL decoder with GA performs better than the SC decoder for block lengths, N=1024, with a maximum difference of 2.72 dB. When the polar decoder with GA is utilised, enhancements are observed in polar code performance for various list sizes and block lengths, although time complexity is increased.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ASEAN Engineering Journal
ASEAN Engineering Journal Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信