静脉局部麻醉:历史综述和临床回顾。

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Benjamin Löser , Martin Petzoldt , Anastassia Löser , Douglas R Bacon , Michael Goerig
{"title":"静脉局部麻醉:历史综述和临床回顾。","authors":"Benjamin Löser ,&nbsp;Martin Petzoldt ,&nbsp;Anastassia Löser ,&nbsp;Douglas R Bacon ,&nbsp;Michael Goerig","doi":"10.1016/j.janh.2018.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Intravenous regional anesthesia<span> (IVRA) is an established, safe and simple technique, being applicable for various surgeries on the upper and lower limbs. In 1908, IVRA was first described by the Berlin<span> surgeon August Bier, hence the name “Bier’s Block”. Although his technique was effective, it was cumbersome and fell into disuse when neuroaxial and percutaneous plexus blockades gained widespread popularity in the early 20</span></span></span><sup>th</sup><span> century. In the 1960s, it became widespread, when the New Zealand anesthesiologist Charles McKinnon Holmes praised its use by means of new available local anesthetics.</span></p><p>Today, IVRA is still popular in many countries being used in the emergency room, for outpatients and for high-risk patients with contraindications for general anesthesia<span>. IVRA offers a favorable risk-benefit ratio, cost-effectiveness, sufficient muscle relaxation and a fast on- and offset. New upcoming methods for monitoring, specialized personnel and improved emergency equipment made IVRA even safer. Moreover, IVRA may be applied to treat complex regional pain syndromes.</span></p><p><span>Prilocaine and lidocaine are considered as first-choice local anesthetics for IVRA. Also, various adjuvant </span>drugs have been tested to augment the effect of IVRA, and to reduce post-deflation tourniquet pain. Since major adverse events are rare in IVRA, it is regarded as a very safe technique. Nevertheless, systemic neuro- and cardiotoxic side effects may be linked to an uncontrolled systemic flush-in of local anesthetics and must be avoided.</p><p>This review gives a historical overview of more than 100 years of experience with IVRA and provides a current view of IVRA with relevant key facts for the daily clinical routine.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.janh.2018.10.007","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravenous Regional Anesthesia: A Historical Overview and Clinical Review\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Löser ,&nbsp;Martin Petzoldt ,&nbsp;Anastassia Löser ,&nbsp;Douglas R Bacon ,&nbsp;Michael Goerig\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.janh.2018.10.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Intravenous regional anesthesia<span> (IVRA) is an established, safe and simple technique, being applicable for various surgeries on the upper and lower limbs. In 1908, IVRA was first described by the Berlin<span> surgeon August Bier, hence the name “Bier’s Block”. Although his technique was effective, it was cumbersome and fell into disuse when neuroaxial and percutaneous plexus blockades gained widespread popularity in the early 20</span></span></span><sup>th</sup><span> century. In the 1960s, it became widespread, when the New Zealand anesthesiologist Charles McKinnon Holmes praised its use by means of new available local anesthetics.</span></p><p>Today, IVRA is still popular in many countries being used in the emergency room, for outpatients and for high-risk patients with contraindications for general anesthesia<span>. IVRA offers a favorable risk-benefit ratio, cost-effectiveness, sufficient muscle relaxation and a fast on- and offset. New upcoming methods for monitoring, specialized personnel and improved emergency equipment made IVRA even safer. Moreover, IVRA may be applied to treat complex regional pain syndromes.</span></p><p><span>Prilocaine and lidocaine are considered as first-choice local anesthetics for IVRA. Also, various adjuvant </span>drugs have been tested to augment the effect of IVRA, and to reduce post-deflation tourniquet pain. Since major adverse events are rare in IVRA, it is regarded as a very safe technique. Nevertheless, systemic neuro- and cardiotoxic side effects may be linked to an uncontrolled systemic flush-in of local anesthetics and must be avoided.</p><p>This review gives a historical overview of more than 100 years of experience with IVRA and provides a current view of IVRA with relevant key facts for the daily clinical routine.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anesthesia History\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.janh.2018.10.007\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anesthesia History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235245291830121X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235245291830121X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

静脉区域麻醉(IVRA)是一种成熟、安全、简便的技术,适用于上肢和下肢的各种手术。1908年,柏林外科医生奥古斯特·比尔首次描述了IVRA,因此被称为“比尔块”。虽然他的技术是有效的,但在20世纪初,当神经轴和经皮神经丛阻滞术广泛流行时,它很麻烦,并且被废弃了。在20世纪60年代,当新西兰麻醉师查尔斯·麦金农·霍姆斯(Charles McKinnon Holmes)通过新的可用局部麻醉剂称赞它的使用时,它变得普遍起来。今天,IVRA在许多国家仍然很流行,用于急诊室、门诊病人和有全身麻醉禁忌症的高危病人。IVRA提供了有利的风险收益比,成本效益,充分的肌肉放松和快速的启动和抵消。新的监测方法、专业人员和改进的应急设备使IVRA更加安全。此外,IVRA可用于治疗复杂的局部疼痛综合征。普胺卡因和利多卡因被认为是IVRA的首选局麻药。此外,已经测试了各种辅助药物来增强IVRA的效果,并减少止血带紧缩后的疼痛。由于IVRA很少发生重大不良事件,因此被认为是一种非常安全的技术。然而,全身神经和心脏毒性副作用可能与局部麻醉药不受控制的全身冲入有关,必须避免。这篇综述给出了100多年IVRA经验的历史概述,并提供了IVRA与日常临床常规相关关键事实的当前观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intravenous Regional Anesthesia: A Historical Overview and Clinical Review

Intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) is an established, safe and simple technique, being applicable for various surgeries on the upper and lower limbs. In 1908, IVRA was first described by the Berlin surgeon August Bier, hence the name “Bier’s Block”. Although his technique was effective, it was cumbersome and fell into disuse when neuroaxial and percutaneous plexus blockades gained widespread popularity in the early 20th century. In the 1960s, it became widespread, when the New Zealand anesthesiologist Charles McKinnon Holmes praised its use by means of new available local anesthetics.

Today, IVRA is still popular in many countries being used in the emergency room, for outpatients and for high-risk patients with contraindications for general anesthesia. IVRA offers a favorable risk-benefit ratio, cost-effectiveness, sufficient muscle relaxation and a fast on- and offset. New upcoming methods for monitoring, specialized personnel and improved emergency equipment made IVRA even safer. Moreover, IVRA may be applied to treat complex regional pain syndromes.

Prilocaine and lidocaine are considered as first-choice local anesthetics for IVRA. Also, various adjuvant drugs have been tested to augment the effect of IVRA, and to reduce post-deflation tourniquet pain. Since major adverse events are rare in IVRA, it is regarded as a very safe technique. Nevertheless, systemic neuro- and cardiotoxic side effects may be linked to an uncontrolled systemic flush-in of local anesthetics and must be avoided.

This review gives a historical overview of more than 100 years of experience with IVRA and provides a current view of IVRA with relevant key facts for the daily clinical routine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Anesthesia History
Journal of Anesthesia History Arts and Humanities-History and Philosophy of Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anesthesia History (ISSN 2352-4529) is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to advancing the study of anesthesia history and related disciplines. The Journal addresses anesthesia history from antiquity to the present. Its wide scope includes the history of perioperative care, pain medicine, critical care medicine, physician and nurse practices of anesthesia, equipment, drugs, and prominent individuals. The Journal serves a diverse audience of physicians, nurses, dentists, clinicians, historians, educators, researchers and academicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信