两极分化时代的信任：对批评者的回应

IF 0.9 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-02-26 DOI:10.1080/13698230.2023.2183603

Kevin Vallier

{"title":"两极分化时代的信任：对批评者的回应","authors":"Kevin Vallier","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2023.2183603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this piece, Vallier responds to critiques of his 2020 book, Trust in a Polarized Age, offered by Mutz, Méon, Kukathas, and Weithman. He first restates the main argument of the book. Mutz and Méon offer criticisms to some of his empirical claims about polarization and trust; in response, Vallier concedes while stressing that one aim of the book is to develop an approach to defending liberal order that updates as these empirical literatures expand and improve. Much of the work Mutz and Méon discuss can be integrated into the book’s broader project. Kukathas and Weithman criticize Vallier’s normative claims, which Vallier defends.","PeriodicalId":46451,"journal":{"name":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","volume":"26 1","pages":"616 - 627"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trust in a polarized age: a reply to critics\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Vallier\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13698230.2023.2183603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this piece, Vallier responds to critiques of his 2020 book, Trust in a Polarized Age, offered by Mutz, Méon, Kukathas, and Weithman. He first restates the main argument of the book. Mutz and Méon offer criticisms to some of his empirical claims about polarization and trust; in response, Vallier concedes while stressing that one aim of the book is to develop an approach to defending liberal order that updates as these empirical literatures expand and improve. Much of the work Mutz and Méon discuss can be integrated into the book’s broader project. Kukathas and Weithman criticize Vallier’s normative claims, which Vallier defends.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"616 - 627\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2023.2183603\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2023.2183603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在这篇文章中，瓦利耶回应了穆茨、梅翁、库卡萨斯和魏特曼对他2020年出版的《两极时代的信任》一书的批评。他首先重述了这本书的主要论点。Mutz和Méon对他关于两极分化和信任的一些实证主张提出了批评；作为回应，瓦利耶承认，同时强调这本书的目的之一是开发一种捍卫自由秩序的方法，随着这些实证文献的扩展和改进，这种方法会不断更新。Mutz和Méon讨论的许多工作可以整合到本书更广泛的项目中。Kukathas和Weithman批评了Vallier的规范性主张，Vallier对此进行了辩护。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Trust in a polarized age: a reply to critics

ABSTRACT In this piece, Vallier responds to critiques of his 2020 book, Trust in a Polarized Age, offered by Mutz, Méon, Kukathas, and Weithman. He first restates the main argument of the book. Mutz and Méon offer criticisms to some of his empirical claims about polarization and trust; in response, Vallier concedes while stressing that one aim of the book is to develop an approach to defending liberal order that updates as these empirical literatures expand and improve. Much of the work Mutz and Méon discuss can be integrated into the book’s broader project. Kukathas and Weithman criticize Vallier’s normative claims, which Vallier defends.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy POLITICAL SCIENCE-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量