Julia S.Charles的《中间世界:种族、表演和路过的政治》和Brigitte Fielder的《相对种族:19世纪美国的异族亲属谱系》(综述)

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
Derek C. Maus
{"title":"Julia S.Charles的《中间世界:种族、表演和路过的政治》和Brigitte Fielder的《相对种族:19世纪美国的异族亲属谱系》(综述)","authors":"Derek C. Maus","doi":"10.1353/afa.2023.a903610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"hearing the voices of those about whom we have not always read, such as Doris Derby and Barbara Molette, as well as of those we have lost, including brief but poignant words from playwright/poet Ntozake Shange and lighting designer Shirley Prendergast. The book also provides a window into career fields not typically showcased in compendiums of this nature, such as stage management and design. Interviews with ‘Femi Sarah Heggie about falling into stage management work with the Negro Ensemble Company and Kathy Perkins’s vast experience as a lighting designer offer a rare and an alternative glimpse into the field as a whole. While Forsgren’s interviews privilege the speaker’s voice, they also share the author’s own positionality, not only as an interviewer and witness but also as an interlocutor and participant in the women’s recollections and histories. While it is clear that she impeccably researched each individual she interviewed, the joy of reading Sistuhs at times comes in part from Forsgren’s own questions and comments, which serve not only to direct interviewees toward more insightful and directive answers but also to make the reader feel as if she were sitting in that living room, café, or theater office with them. It is almost as if we can hear their voices, their laughter, as if we were eavesdropping on a shared secret. (In fact, Forsgren offers her own journey in this process in the Appendix, sharing that it was not until she called attention to her particular position as a Black female theater artist did some of the women wish to speak with her at all.) The context Forsgren provides ahead of sections of interviewees is valuable, as are the biographies in the back of the book. A small criticism would be that a reader who is not a scholar of the Black Arts Movement and/or theater history will appreciate some of the details, but not understand the whole story as told. Narratives weave in and out at times and even with Forsgren’s informative perspective, the interviews can feel disjointed in the order in which she’s chosen to share them. Forsgren notes forthrightly that this collection should not serve as a “definitive” history of women’s involvement in the Black Arts Movement (11), but Sistuhs in the Struggle provides a critical and necessary compendium of the marginalized and silenced voices of Black female theater artists. As playwright P. J. Gibson shares, “It is incumbent upon me to leave an arsenal of information that gives a glimpse into the black presence in America during the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. That’s my job” (321).","PeriodicalId":44779,"journal":{"name":"AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"That Middle World: Race, Performance, and the Politics of Passing by Julia S. Charles, and: Relative Races: Genealogies of Interracial Kinship in Nineteenth-Century America by Brigitte Fielder (review)\",\"authors\":\"Derek C. Maus\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/afa.2023.a903610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"hearing the voices of those about whom we have not always read, such as Doris Derby and Barbara Molette, as well as of those we have lost, including brief but poignant words from playwright/poet Ntozake Shange and lighting designer Shirley Prendergast. The book also provides a window into career fields not typically showcased in compendiums of this nature, such as stage management and design. Interviews with ‘Femi Sarah Heggie about falling into stage management work with the Negro Ensemble Company and Kathy Perkins’s vast experience as a lighting designer offer a rare and an alternative glimpse into the field as a whole. While Forsgren’s interviews privilege the speaker’s voice, they also share the author’s own positionality, not only as an interviewer and witness but also as an interlocutor and participant in the women’s recollections and histories. While it is clear that she impeccably researched each individual she interviewed, the joy of reading Sistuhs at times comes in part from Forsgren’s own questions and comments, which serve not only to direct interviewees toward more insightful and directive answers but also to make the reader feel as if she were sitting in that living room, café, or theater office with them. It is almost as if we can hear their voices, their laughter, as if we were eavesdropping on a shared secret. (In fact, Forsgren offers her own journey in this process in the Appendix, sharing that it was not until she called attention to her particular position as a Black female theater artist did some of the women wish to speak with her at all.) The context Forsgren provides ahead of sections of interviewees is valuable, as are the biographies in the back of the book. A small criticism would be that a reader who is not a scholar of the Black Arts Movement and/or theater history will appreciate some of the details, but not understand the whole story as told. Narratives weave in and out at times and even with Forsgren’s informative perspective, the interviews can feel disjointed in the order in which she’s chosen to share them. Forsgren notes forthrightly that this collection should not serve as a “definitive” history of women’s involvement in the Black Arts Movement (11), but Sistuhs in the Struggle provides a critical and necessary compendium of the marginalized and silenced voices of Black female theater artists. As playwright P. J. Gibson shares, “It is incumbent upon me to leave an arsenal of information that gives a glimpse into the black presence in America during the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. That’s my job” (321).\",\"PeriodicalId\":44779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/afa.2023.a903610\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/afa.2023.a903610","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

听到了那些我们不常读到的人的声音,比如多丽丝·德比和芭芭拉·莫莱特,以及那些我们失去的人,包括剧作家/诗人恩托扎克·尚格和灯光设计师雪莉·普伦德加斯特简短但辛酸的话。这本书还提供了一个了解职业领域的窗口,这些领域通常不会在这种性质的简编中展示,比如舞台管理和设计。对Femi Sarah Heggie的采访讲述了她在黑人合奏团公司从事舞台管理工作的经历,以及Kathy Perkins作为灯光设计师的丰富经验,为我们提供了一个罕见的、另类的视角。虽然福斯格伦的采访赋予了演讲者的发言权,但他们也分享了作者自己的立场,不仅是作为采访者和证人,也是女性回忆和历史的对话者和参与者。虽然很明显,她对采访的每一个人都进行了无可挑剔的研究,但阅读《西斯图》的乐趣有时部分来自Forsgren自己的问题和评论,这些问题和评论不仅有助于引导受访者找到更具洞察力和指导性的答案,还让读者感觉她和他们一起坐在客厅、咖啡馆或剧院办公室里。我们几乎可以听到他们的声音,他们的笑声,就好像我们在窃听一个共同的秘密。(事实上,Forsgren在附录中介绍了她自己在这一过程中的经历,她分享说,直到她提请人们注意她作为黑人女戏剧艺术家的特殊地位,一些女性才希望与她交谈。)Forsgren为部分受访者提供的背景很有价值,书后面的传记也是如此。一个小的批评是,一个不是黑人艺术运动和/或戏剧史学者的读者会欣赏其中的一些细节,但不会理解整个故事。叙述有时会穿插进来,即使福斯格伦的视角信息丰富,采访也会让人感觉脱节,因为她选择了分享这些采访的顺序。Forsgren直率地指出,这本作品集不应成为女性参与黑人艺术运动的“决定性”历史(11),但《斗争中的西斯图》为黑人女性戏剧艺术家被边缘化和沉默的声音提供了一个关键而必要的简编。正如剧作家P·J·吉布森所分享的那样,“我有责任留下一个信息库,让人们一窥二十世纪和二十一世纪美国黑人的存在。这是我的工作”(321)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
That Middle World: Race, Performance, and the Politics of Passing by Julia S. Charles, and: Relative Races: Genealogies of Interracial Kinship in Nineteenth-Century America by Brigitte Fielder (review)
hearing the voices of those about whom we have not always read, such as Doris Derby and Barbara Molette, as well as of those we have lost, including brief but poignant words from playwright/poet Ntozake Shange and lighting designer Shirley Prendergast. The book also provides a window into career fields not typically showcased in compendiums of this nature, such as stage management and design. Interviews with ‘Femi Sarah Heggie about falling into stage management work with the Negro Ensemble Company and Kathy Perkins’s vast experience as a lighting designer offer a rare and an alternative glimpse into the field as a whole. While Forsgren’s interviews privilege the speaker’s voice, they also share the author’s own positionality, not only as an interviewer and witness but also as an interlocutor and participant in the women’s recollections and histories. While it is clear that she impeccably researched each individual she interviewed, the joy of reading Sistuhs at times comes in part from Forsgren’s own questions and comments, which serve not only to direct interviewees toward more insightful and directive answers but also to make the reader feel as if she were sitting in that living room, café, or theater office with them. It is almost as if we can hear their voices, their laughter, as if we were eavesdropping on a shared secret. (In fact, Forsgren offers her own journey in this process in the Appendix, sharing that it was not until she called attention to her particular position as a Black female theater artist did some of the women wish to speak with her at all.) The context Forsgren provides ahead of sections of interviewees is valuable, as are the biographies in the back of the book. A small criticism would be that a reader who is not a scholar of the Black Arts Movement and/or theater history will appreciate some of the details, but not understand the whole story as told. Narratives weave in and out at times and even with Forsgren’s informative perspective, the interviews can feel disjointed in the order in which she’s chosen to share them. Forsgren notes forthrightly that this collection should not serve as a “definitive” history of women’s involvement in the Black Arts Movement (11), but Sistuhs in the Struggle provides a critical and necessary compendium of the marginalized and silenced voices of Black female theater artists. As playwright P. J. Gibson shares, “It is incumbent upon me to leave an arsenal of information that gives a glimpse into the black presence in America during the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. That’s my job” (321).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW
AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: As the official publication of the Division on Black American Literature and Culture of the Modern Language Association, the quarterly journal African American Review promotes a lively exchange among writers and scholars in the arts, humanities, and social sciences who hold diverse perspectives on African American literature and culture. Between 1967 and 1976, the journal appeared under the title Negro American Literature Forum and for the next fifteen years was titled Black American Literature Forum. In 1992, African American Review changed its name for a third time and expanded its mission to include the study of a broader array of cultural formations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信