殖民地与单独繁殖:摩洛哥褐喉马丁斯Riparia paludicola的筑巢模式

IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q2 ORNITHOLOGY
P. Greig-Smith
{"title":"殖民地与单独繁殖:摩洛哥褐喉马丁斯Riparia paludicola的筑巢模式","authors":"P. Greig-Smith","doi":"10.2989/00306525.2021.1940342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explored reasons for variable nesting habits in a hole-nesting bird species that sometimes breeds colonially and sometimes alone. Nesting was surveyed over ten years in natural sand cliffs and similar features created by human activity along a river and nearby habitats. Two-thirds of nests were in small colonies of 2–16 birds, where nests were less than 25 m from neighbouring breeders. Many others were hundreds of metres apart. Individual breeding locations were abandoned after only a few years’ occupation, often without obvious habitat change. Birds responded very rapidly to the sudden exposure of fresh sand cliffs by starting new colonies. If floods occurred in the first half of the season, nesting in the second half shifted to less vulnerable areas. Substantial changes from year to year, in the location of breeding activity and the ratio of colony to solitary nests, were unrelated to variations in rainfall (a likely measure of feeding conditions) in the previous breeding season or the six months prior to breeding. The proportion of nests in colonies was positively correlated with the numbers of birds breeding, indicating that coloniality was not limited by available sites. Behaviour at colony and solitary nests suggested that one benefit of group nesting is more frequent and stronger response to birds of prey. Extra adults visiting nests alongside the breeding pair were more frequent at colonies, though the significance of this is unknown. There was no evidence for neighbouring breeders coordinating their visits to and from colonies. Costs of group nesting (more frequent disturbance by groups of non-breeders, and time in defence of nests) were higher at colonies, though levels of aggression were very low. Coloniality is more likely to be an incidental result of birds independently selecting good nesting sites in an unpredictable habitat, than because of social benefits of breeding close together.","PeriodicalId":54655,"journal":{"name":"Ostrich","volume":"92 1","pages":"203 - 217"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Colonial versus solitary breeding: nesting patterns of Brown-throated Martins Riparia paludicola in Morocco\",\"authors\":\"P. Greig-Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.2989/00306525.2021.1940342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study explored reasons for variable nesting habits in a hole-nesting bird species that sometimes breeds colonially and sometimes alone. Nesting was surveyed over ten years in natural sand cliffs and similar features created by human activity along a river and nearby habitats. Two-thirds of nests were in small colonies of 2–16 birds, where nests were less than 25 m from neighbouring breeders. Many others were hundreds of metres apart. Individual breeding locations were abandoned after only a few years’ occupation, often without obvious habitat change. Birds responded very rapidly to the sudden exposure of fresh sand cliffs by starting new colonies. If floods occurred in the first half of the season, nesting in the second half shifted to less vulnerable areas. Substantial changes from year to year, in the location of breeding activity and the ratio of colony to solitary nests, were unrelated to variations in rainfall (a likely measure of feeding conditions) in the previous breeding season or the six months prior to breeding. The proportion of nests in colonies was positively correlated with the numbers of birds breeding, indicating that coloniality was not limited by available sites. Behaviour at colony and solitary nests suggested that one benefit of group nesting is more frequent and stronger response to birds of prey. Extra adults visiting nests alongside the breeding pair were more frequent at colonies, though the significance of this is unknown. There was no evidence for neighbouring breeders coordinating their visits to and from colonies. Costs of group nesting (more frequent disturbance by groups of non-breeders, and time in defence of nests) were higher at colonies, though levels of aggression were very low. Coloniality is more likely to be an incidental result of birds independently selecting good nesting sites in an unpredictable habitat, than because of social benefits of breeding close together.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ostrich\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"203 - 217\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ostrich\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2989/00306525.2021.1940342\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORNITHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ostrich","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2989/00306525.2021.1940342","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORNITHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究探讨了洞巢鸟类不同筑巢习惯的原因,这些鸟类有时是殖民繁殖,有时是单独繁殖。在自然沙崖和河流沿岸和附近栖息地的人类活动创造的类似特征中,对筑巢进行了十多年的调查。三分之二的巢穴是在2-16只鸟的小群落中,那里的巢穴距离附近的繁殖者不到25米。其他许多人相距数百米。个体繁殖地在被占领几年后就被遗弃了,通常没有明显的栖息地变化。鸟类对新鲜沙崖的突然暴露反应非常迅速,开始了新的群落。如果洪水发生在上半季,那么下半季的筑巢就会转移到不太脆弱的地区。繁殖活动的地点和群体与孤巢的比例逐年发生重大变化,与前一个繁殖季节或繁殖前六个月的降雨量变化(可能是衡量喂养条件的指标)无关。巢穴在群落中的比例与鸟类繁殖的数量呈正相关,表明群落性不受可用地点的限制。在群体和单独巢穴的行为表明,群体筑巢的一个好处是对猛禽的反应更频繁、更强。在繁殖地,与繁殖对一起筑巢的额外成虫更频繁,尽管这一点的意义尚不清楚。没有证据表明附近的饲养员协调他们往返于殖民地。群体筑巢的成本(非繁殖者群体更频繁的干扰,以及保卫巢穴的时间)在群体中更高,尽管攻击水平非常低。群体性更可能是鸟类在不可预测的栖息地独立选择良好筑巢地点的偶然结果,而不是因为近距离繁殖的社会效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Colonial versus solitary breeding: nesting patterns of Brown-throated Martins Riparia paludicola in Morocco
This study explored reasons for variable nesting habits in a hole-nesting bird species that sometimes breeds colonially and sometimes alone. Nesting was surveyed over ten years in natural sand cliffs and similar features created by human activity along a river and nearby habitats. Two-thirds of nests were in small colonies of 2–16 birds, where nests were less than 25 m from neighbouring breeders. Many others were hundreds of metres apart. Individual breeding locations were abandoned after only a few years’ occupation, often without obvious habitat change. Birds responded very rapidly to the sudden exposure of fresh sand cliffs by starting new colonies. If floods occurred in the first half of the season, nesting in the second half shifted to less vulnerable areas. Substantial changes from year to year, in the location of breeding activity and the ratio of colony to solitary nests, were unrelated to variations in rainfall (a likely measure of feeding conditions) in the previous breeding season or the six months prior to breeding. The proportion of nests in colonies was positively correlated with the numbers of birds breeding, indicating that coloniality was not limited by available sites. Behaviour at colony and solitary nests suggested that one benefit of group nesting is more frequent and stronger response to birds of prey. Extra adults visiting nests alongside the breeding pair were more frequent at colonies, though the significance of this is unknown. There was no evidence for neighbouring breeders coordinating their visits to and from colonies. Costs of group nesting (more frequent disturbance by groups of non-breeders, and time in defence of nests) were higher at colonies, though levels of aggression were very low. Coloniality is more likely to be an incidental result of birds independently selecting good nesting sites in an unpredictable habitat, than because of social benefits of breeding close together.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ostrich
Ostrich 生物-鸟类学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
30.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ostrich: Journal of African Ornithology is the leading ornithological journal in Africa, and publishes peer-reviewed scientific papers and short communications (
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信