脂蛋白脂酶基因多态性及其与颈动脉狭窄发展和严重程度的关系

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mahmood Shaker Khazaal, Farqad Bader Hamdan, Qasim Sharhan Al-Mayah
{"title":"脂蛋白脂酶基因多态性及其与颈动脉狭窄发展和严重程度的关系","authors":"Mahmood Shaker Khazaal, Farqad Bader Hamdan, Qasim Sharhan Al-Mayah","doi":"10.51248/.v43i3.2818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and Aim: In developed countries, carotid artery stenosis (CAS) has a considerable impact on mortality and disability rates. Genetic risk factors for CAS have also been linked, in addition to environmental risk factors. This study sought to determine whether there may be a link between three polymorphisms in the LPL gene and the emergence of CAS.\n \nMaterials and Methods: One hundred and twenty participants were enrolled in this case-control study, including 60 individuals with CAS and 60 healthy subjects serving as the control group. The demographic and clinical data were collected from each participant. Whole blood samples were obtained to study the genomic DNA where a specific LPL gene fragment corresponding to the three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs320, rs328, and rs285 was amplified using designated primers. Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis was used for genotyping.\n \nResults: The mutant allele (C) of the rs285 polymorphism was more frequent in patients than controls (45% vs. 32.5%; OR=1.7, 95% CI= 1.01- 2.87; p=0.048). The TCC haplotype block (T allele of rs320, C allele of rs285, and C allele of rs328) was significantly more prevalent in patients compared to controls (OR= 2.0, 95% CI= 1.03-3.77, p= 0.039). On the other hand, controls (23.33%) had significantly more of the haplotype block GTG than did patients (8.33%) (OR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.14-0.065, p = 0.002). The SNPs rs320 (D' = 0.63) and rs328 (D' = 0.61) have weak relationships with rs385.\n \nConclusion: The C allele of rs285 polymorphism could be considered a risk factor for CAS. While the haplotype block GTG was thought to play a protective role, the haplotype block TCC (T allele of rs320, C allele of rs285, and C allele of rs328) may increase the risk of CAS.","PeriodicalId":51650,"journal":{"name":"BioMedicine-Taiwan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lipoprotein lipase gene polymorphisms and their association with the development and severity of carotid artery stenosis\",\"authors\":\"Mahmood Shaker Khazaal, Farqad Bader Hamdan, Qasim Sharhan Al-Mayah\",\"doi\":\"10.51248/.v43i3.2818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction and Aim: In developed countries, carotid artery stenosis (CAS) has a considerable impact on mortality and disability rates. Genetic risk factors for CAS have also been linked, in addition to environmental risk factors. This study sought to determine whether there may be a link between three polymorphisms in the LPL gene and the emergence of CAS.\\n \\nMaterials and Methods: One hundred and twenty participants were enrolled in this case-control study, including 60 individuals with CAS and 60 healthy subjects serving as the control group. The demographic and clinical data were collected from each participant. Whole blood samples were obtained to study the genomic DNA where a specific LPL gene fragment corresponding to the three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs320, rs328, and rs285 was amplified using designated primers. Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis was used for genotyping.\\n \\nResults: The mutant allele (C) of the rs285 polymorphism was more frequent in patients than controls (45% vs. 32.5%; OR=1.7, 95% CI= 1.01- 2.87; p=0.048). The TCC haplotype block (T allele of rs320, C allele of rs285, and C allele of rs328) was significantly more prevalent in patients compared to controls (OR= 2.0, 95% CI= 1.03-3.77, p= 0.039). On the other hand, controls (23.33%) had significantly more of the haplotype block GTG than did patients (8.33%) (OR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.14-0.065, p = 0.002). The SNPs rs320 (D' = 0.63) and rs328 (D' = 0.61) have weak relationships with rs385.\\n \\nConclusion: The C allele of rs285 polymorphism could be considered a risk factor for CAS. While the haplotype block GTG was thought to play a protective role, the haplotype block TCC (T allele of rs320, C allele of rs285, and C allele of rs328) may increase the risk of CAS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BioMedicine-Taiwan\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BioMedicine-Taiwan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51248/.v43i3.2818\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMedicine-Taiwan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51248/.v43i3.2818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言和目的:在发达国家,颈动脉狭窄(CAS)对死亡率和致残率有很大影响。除了环境风险因素外,CAS的遗传风险因素也有关联。本研究旨在确定LPL基因的三种多态性与CAS的出现之间是否存在联系。材料与方法:120名受试者参加了这项病例对照研究,其中包括60名CAS患者和60名健康受试者作为对照组。从每个参与者那里收集人口统计学和临床数据。获得全血样本以研究基因组DNA,其中使用指定引物扩增对应于三个单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)rs320、rs328和rs285的特异性LPL基因片段。限制性片段长度多态性分析用于基因分型。结果:rs285多态性的突变等位基因(C)在患者中比对照组更常见(45%vs.32.5%;OR=1.7,95%CI=1.01-2.87;p=0.048)。与对照组相比,TCC单倍型块(rs320的T等位基因、rs285的C等位基因和rs328的C等等位基因)在患者中显着更普遍(OR=2.0,95%CI=1.03-3.77,p=0.039)。另一方面,对照组(23.33%)明显多于对照组(8.33%)(OR=0.3,95%CI=0.14-0.065,p=0.002)。rs320(D’=0.63)和rs328(D’0.61)与rs385的关系较弱。结论:rs285多态性的C等位基因可能是CAS的危险因素。虽然单倍型阻断GTG被认为起保护作用,但单倍型阻滞TCC(rs320的T等位基因、rs285的C等位基因和rs328的C等基因)可能会增加CAS的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lipoprotein lipase gene polymorphisms and their association with the development and severity of carotid artery stenosis
Introduction and Aim: In developed countries, carotid artery stenosis (CAS) has a considerable impact on mortality and disability rates. Genetic risk factors for CAS have also been linked, in addition to environmental risk factors. This study sought to determine whether there may be a link between three polymorphisms in the LPL gene and the emergence of CAS.   Materials and Methods: One hundred and twenty participants were enrolled in this case-control study, including 60 individuals with CAS and 60 healthy subjects serving as the control group. The demographic and clinical data were collected from each participant. Whole blood samples were obtained to study the genomic DNA where a specific LPL gene fragment corresponding to the three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs320, rs328, and rs285 was amplified using designated primers. Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis was used for genotyping.   Results: The mutant allele (C) of the rs285 polymorphism was more frequent in patients than controls (45% vs. 32.5%; OR=1.7, 95% CI= 1.01- 2.87; p=0.048). The TCC haplotype block (T allele of rs320, C allele of rs285, and C allele of rs328) was significantly more prevalent in patients compared to controls (OR= 2.0, 95% CI= 1.03-3.77, p= 0.039). On the other hand, controls (23.33%) had significantly more of the haplotype block GTG than did patients (8.33%) (OR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.14-0.065, p = 0.002). The SNPs rs320 (D' = 0.63) and rs328 (D' = 0.61) have weak relationships with rs385.   Conclusion: The C allele of rs285 polymorphism could be considered a risk factor for CAS. While the haplotype block GTG was thought to play a protective role, the haplotype block TCC (T allele of rs320, C allele of rs285, and C allele of rs328) may increase the risk of CAS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BioMedicine-Taiwan
BioMedicine-Taiwan MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
21
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信