{"title":"高氯酸铵/端羟基聚丁二烯复合推进剂燃烧的现代竞争火焰模型","authors":"James C. Thomas, E. Petersen","doi":"10.2514/1.b38925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The competing flames model, also termed the Beckstead–Derr–Price model, for steady-state heterogeneous propellant combustion has been widely used but has not been sufficiently updated in decades or compared to modern propellant combustion databases. In the current study, historical competing flames modeling approaches were thoroughly documented; and an improved framework was outlined and updated to include several improvements, such as variable flame temperatures, specific heat capacities, and latent heat terms. Model parameters were initially taken from previous literature, but the fuel and diffusion flame parameters were optimized based on a compiled database of unimodal propellant burning rates from the literature spanning a wide range of ammonium perchlorate (AP) particle sizes ([Formula: see text]), AP mass concentrations (70–87.5%), and combustion pressures (0.7–20.7 MPa). The improved model was compared to AP monopropellant, unimodal, and multimodal propellant burning rate databases from the literature. General dependencies of the burning rate-to-oxidizer concentration and size were accurately captured. The predictive capability of the improved model for AP monopropellant burning rates and unimodal propellant formulations was excellent, where the only significant discrepancies were noted for very fine AP particles ([Formula: see text]). Model predictions for multimodal formulations were moderate and could be improved by alternative pseudopropellant apportionment and statistical accounting schemes.","PeriodicalId":16903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Propulsion and Power","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modern Competing Flames Model for Composite Ammonium Perchlorate/Hydroxyl-Terminated Polybutadiene Propellant Combustion\",\"authors\":\"James C. Thomas, E. Petersen\",\"doi\":\"10.2514/1.b38925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The competing flames model, also termed the Beckstead–Derr–Price model, for steady-state heterogeneous propellant combustion has been widely used but has not been sufficiently updated in decades or compared to modern propellant combustion databases. In the current study, historical competing flames modeling approaches were thoroughly documented; and an improved framework was outlined and updated to include several improvements, such as variable flame temperatures, specific heat capacities, and latent heat terms. Model parameters were initially taken from previous literature, but the fuel and diffusion flame parameters were optimized based on a compiled database of unimodal propellant burning rates from the literature spanning a wide range of ammonium perchlorate (AP) particle sizes ([Formula: see text]), AP mass concentrations (70–87.5%), and combustion pressures (0.7–20.7 MPa). The improved model was compared to AP monopropellant, unimodal, and multimodal propellant burning rate databases from the literature. General dependencies of the burning rate-to-oxidizer concentration and size were accurately captured. The predictive capability of the improved model for AP monopropellant burning rates and unimodal propellant formulations was excellent, where the only significant discrepancies were noted for very fine AP particles ([Formula: see text]). Model predictions for multimodal formulations were moderate and could be improved by alternative pseudopropellant apportionment and statistical accounting schemes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Propulsion and Power\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Propulsion and Power\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b38925\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Propulsion and Power","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b38925","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Modern Competing Flames Model for Composite Ammonium Perchlorate/Hydroxyl-Terminated Polybutadiene Propellant Combustion
The competing flames model, also termed the Beckstead–Derr–Price model, for steady-state heterogeneous propellant combustion has been widely used but has not been sufficiently updated in decades or compared to modern propellant combustion databases. In the current study, historical competing flames modeling approaches were thoroughly documented; and an improved framework was outlined and updated to include several improvements, such as variable flame temperatures, specific heat capacities, and latent heat terms. Model parameters were initially taken from previous literature, but the fuel and diffusion flame parameters were optimized based on a compiled database of unimodal propellant burning rates from the literature spanning a wide range of ammonium perchlorate (AP) particle sizes ([Formula: see text]), AP mass concentrations (70–87.5%), and combustion pressures (0.7–20.7 MPa). The improved model was compared to AP monopropellant, unimodal, and multimodal propellant burning rate databases from the literature. General dependencies of the burning rate-to-oxidizer concentration and size were accurately captured. The predictive capability of the improved model for AP monopropellant burning rates and unimodal propellant formulations was excellent, where the only significant discrepancies were noted for very fine AP particles ([Formula: see text]). Model predictions for multimodal formulations were moderate and could be improved by alternative pseudopropellant apportionment and statistical accounting schemes.
期刊介绍:
This Journal is devoted to the advancement of the science and technology of aerospace propulsion and power through the dissemination of original archival papers contributing to advancements in airbreathing, electric, and advanced propulsion; solid and liquid rockets; fuels and propellants; power generation and conversion for aerospace vehicles; and the application of aerospace science and technology to terrestrial energy devices and systems. It is intended to provide readers of the Journal, with primary interests in propulsion and power, access to papers spanning the range from research through development to applications. Papers in these disciplines and the sciences of combustion, fluid mechanics, and solid mechanics as directly related to propulsion and power are solicited.