文化资本与毕业考试:文学作品校单分析

Q4 Social Sciences
Ondřej Špaček
{"title":"文化资本与毕业考试:文学作品校单分析","authors":"Ondřej Špaček","doi":"10.14712/23363177.2021.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Study focuses on ways how education system consecrates particular literary works as pieces of the legitimate culture . It also pays attention to the correspondence between leaving examination syllabus and position of schools in the field of upper secondary education. The study employs data connected to the state leaving examination to explore less apparent mech-anisms of reproduction of cultural capital and its unequal distribution in the educational system. The original data file includes ‘school list of literary works’ gathered from 831 secondary schools, encompassing 82 722 individual items (works) . Empirical analysis shows the narrow delineation of the literary canon. Half of the unique items in the whole file comprises only 80 most frequent works. There is also profound between-school differentiation in the lists . Schools belonging to the upper segment of the cultural capital scale often include pieces of modern literature and theatre . On the other hand, lower segment schools often include literary works characterised by straightforward narrative form . The analysis shows that differences between maturita exam school list further en-trench the distinction between academic and vocational educational tracks .","PeriodicalId":38228,"journal":{"name":"Orbis Scholae","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kulturní kapitál a maturitní zkouška: analýza školních seznamů literárních děl\",\"authors\":\"Ondřej Špaček\",\"doi\":\"10.14712/23363177.2021.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Study focuses on ways how education system consecrates particular literary works as pieces of the legitimate culture . It also pays attention to the correspondence between leaving examination syllabus and position of schools in the field of upper secondary education. The study employs data connected to the state leaving examination to explore less apparent mech-anisms of reproduction of cultural capital and its unequal distribution in the educational system. The original data file includes ‘school list of literary works’ gathered from 831 secondary schools, encompassing 82 722 individual items (works) . Empirical analysis shows the narrow delineation of the literary canon. Half of the unique items in the whole file comprises only 80 most frequent works. There is also profound between-school differentiation in the lists . Schools belonging to the upper segment of the cultural capital scale often include pieces of modern literature and theatre . On the other hand, lower segment schools often include literary works characterised by straightforward narrative form . The analysis shows that differences between maturita exam school list further en-trench the distinction between academic and vocational educational tracks .\",\"PeriodicalId\":38228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orbis Scholae\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orbis Scholae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2021.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orbis Scholae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2021.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究的重点是教育体系如何将特定的文学作品神圣化为合法文化的一部分。它还注意到离校考试大纲与学校在高中教育领域的地位之间的对应关系。该研究使用了与国家离职考试相关的数据,以探索文化资本再生产的不太明显的机制及其在教育系统中的不平等分配。原始数据文件包括从831所中学收集的“学校文学作品列表”,包括82722个单项(作品)。实证分析表明,对文学经典的界定过于狭隘。整个文件中有一半的独特项目只包含80个最频繁的作品。在名单中,学校之间也存在着深刻的差异。属于文化资本规模上层的学校通常包括现代文学和戏剧作品。另一方面,低层次流派通常包括以直接叙事形式为特征的文学作品。分析表明,成熟度考试学校名单之间的差异进一步加深了学术和职业教育轨道之间的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kulturní kapitál a maturitní zkouška: analýza školních seznamů literárních děl
: Study focuses on ways how education system consecrates particular literary works as pieces of the legitimate culture . It also pays attention to the correspondence between leaving examination syllabus and position of schools in the field of upper secondary education. The study employs data connected to the state leaving examination to explore less apparent mech-anisms of reproduction of cultural capital and its unequal distribution in the educational system. The original data file includes ‘school list of literary works’ gathered from 831 secondary schools, encompassing 82 722 individual items (works) . Empirical analysis shows the narrow delineation of the literary canon. Half of the unique items in the whole file comprises only 80 most frequent works. There is also profound between-school differentiation in the lists . Schools belonging to the upper segment of the cultural capital scale often include pieces of modern literature and theatre . On the other hand, lower segment schools often include literary works characterised by straightforward narrative form . The analysis shows that differences between maturita exam school list further en-trench the distinction between academic and vocational educational tracks .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orbis Scholae
Orbis Scholae Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信