推特如何推动全球新闻议程：来自巴西、俄罗斯、印度、中国、英国和美国的推文以及关于2016年美国总统大选的在线讨论

IF 1.5 Q2 COMMUNICATION

Global Media and Communication Pub Date : 2021-08-23 DOI:10.1177/17427665211039970

Jane O’Boyle, Carol J. Pardun

{"title":"推特如何推动全球新闻议程：来自巴西、俄罗斯、印度、中国、英国和美国的推文以及关于2016年美国总统大选的在线讨论","authors":"Jane O’Boyle, Carol J. Pardun","doi":"10.1177/17427665211039970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A manual content analysis compares 6019 Twitter comments from six countries during the 2016 US presidential election. Twitter comments were positive about Trump and negative about Clinton in Russia, the US and also in India and China. In the UK and Brazil, Twitter comments were largely negative about both candidates. Twitter sources for Clinton comments were more frequently from journalists and news companies, and still more negative than positive in tone. Topics on Twitter varied from those in mainstream news media. This foundational study expands communications research on social media, as well as political communications and international distinctions.","PeriodicalId":45157,"journal":{"name":"Global Media and Communication","volume":"17 1","pages":"363 - 384"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Twitter drives the global news agenda: Tweets from Brazil, Russia, India, China, the UK and US and online discourse about the 2016 US presidential election\",\"authors\":\"Jane O’Boyle, Carol J. Pardun\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17427665211039970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A manual content analysis compares 6019 Twitter comments from six countries during the 2016 US presidential election. Twitter comments were positive about Trump and negative about Clinton in Russia, the US and also in India and China. In the UK and Brazil, Twitter comments were largely negative about both candidates. Twitter sources for Clinton comments were more frequently from journalists and news companies, and still more negative than positive in tone. Topics on Twitter varied from those in mainstream news media. This foundational study expands communications research on social media, as well as political communications and international distinctions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Media and Communication\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"363 - 384\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Media and Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17427665211039970\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Media and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17427665211039970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

一项手动内容分析比较了2016年美国总统大选期间来自六个国家的6019条推特评论。在俄罗斯、美国、印度和中国，推特上对特朗普的评论是正面的，对克林顿的评论是负面的。在英国和巴西，推特上对两位候选人的评论大多是负面的。推特上对克林顿的评论来源更多地来自记者和新闻公司，语气仍然是负面多于正面。推特上的话题与主流新闻媒体上的不同。这项基础研究扩展了对社交媒体的传播研究，以及政治传播和国际差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

How Twitter drives the global news agenda: Tweets from Brazil, Russia, India, China, the UK and US and online discourse about the 2016 US presidential election

A manual content analysis compares 6019 Twitter comments from six countries during the 2016 US presidential election. Twitter comments were positive about Trump and negative about Clinton in Russia, the US and also in India and China. In the UK and Brazil, Twitter comments were largely negative about both candidates. Twitter sources for Clinton comments were more frequently from journalists and news companies, and still more negative than positive in tone. Topics on Twitter varied from those in mainstream news media. This foundational study expands communications research on social media, as well as political communications and international distinctions.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Global Media and Communication COMMUNICATION-

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Global Media and Communication is an international peer-reviewed journal launched in April 2005 as a key forum for articulating critical debates and developments in the continuously changing global media and communications environment. As a pioneering platform for the exchange of ideas and multiple perspectives, the journal addresses fresh and contentious research agendas and promotes an academic dialogue that is fully transnational and transdisciplinary in its scope. With a network of ten regional editors around the world, the journal offers a global source of material on international media and cultural processes. Special features include interviews, reviews of recent media developments and digests of policy documents and data reports from a variety of countries.