解除哥本哈根手指计划：走向计划主义的新自由化？

IF 1.7 Q4 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING

International Planning Studies Pub Date : 2021-06-23 DOI:10.1080/13563475.2021.1945913

K. Olesen

{"title":"解除哥本哈根手指计划：走向计划主义的新自由化？","authors":"K. Olesen","doi":"10.1080/13563475.2021.1945913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Finger Plan has guided the spatial development of the Greater Copenhagen Area for more than 70 years, constituting a planning doctrine in Danish spatial planning. However, recently the Finger Plan has come under attack from the liberal Danish Government (2015–2019), who implemented a number of initiatives to deregulate spatial planning in Denmark, most significantly through a ‘modernised’ Planning Act. As part of this process, the Finger Plan was revised twice in 2017 and 2019. The latest version of the Finger plan was prepared as part of a larger policy package aiming at promoting growth in the Greater Copenhagen Region towards 2030. This paper argues that the recent revisions of the Finger Plan must be understood as part of the ongoing neoliberalization of spatial planning in Denmark, but that the Finger Plan, at the same time, has remained ‘immune’ to a more widespread neoliberalization in this process.","PeriodicalId":46688,"journal":{"name":"International Planning Studies","volume":"27 1","pages":"77 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13563475.2021.1945913","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unsettling the Copenhagen Finger Plan: towards neoliberalization of a planning doctrine?\",\"authors\":\"K. Olesen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13563475.2021.1945913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The Finger Plan has guided the spatial development of the Greater Copenhagen Area for more than 70 years, constituting a planning doctrine in Danish spatial planning. However, recently the Finger Plan has come under attack from the liberal Danish Government (2015–2019), who implemented a number of initiatives to deregulate spatial planning in Denmark, most significantly through a ‘modernised’ Planning Act. As part of this process, the Finger Plan was revised twice in 2017 and 2019. The latest version of the Finger plan was prepared as part of a larger policy package aiming at promoting growth in the Greater Copenhagen Region towards 2030. This paper argues that the recent revisions of the Finger Plan must be understood as part of the ongoing neoliberalization of spatial planning in Denmark, but that the Finger Plan, at the same time, has remained ‘immune’ to a more widespread neoliberalization in this process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Planning Studies\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"77 - 90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13563475.2021.1945913\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Planning Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2021.1945913\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Planning Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2021.1945913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

“手指计划”指导大哥本哈根地区的空间发展已有70多年，是丹麦空间规划中的一个规划原则。然而，最近，Finger计划受到了自由派丹麦政府（2015-2019）的攻击，丹麦政府实施了一系列举措来放松对丹麦空间规划的管制，其中最重要的是通过“现代化”规划法。作为这一过程的一部分，手指计划在2017年和2019年进行了两次修订。芬格计划的最新版本是作为一项更大的一揽子政策的一部分制定的，该政策旨在促进大哥本哈根地区到2030年的增长。本文认为，最近对芬格计划的修订必须被理解为丹麦正在进行的空间规划新自由化的一部分，但与此同时，芬格计划在这一过程中仍然“免疫”于更广泛的新自由化。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Unsettling the Copenhagen Finger Plan: towards neoliberalization of a planning doctrine?

ABSTRACT The Finger Plan has guided the spatial development of the Greater Copenhagen Area for more than 70 years, constituting a planning doctrine in Danish spatial planning. However, recently the Finger Plan has come under attack from the liberal Danish Government (2015–2019), who implemented a number of initiatives to deregulate spatial planning in Denmark, most significantly through a ‘modernised’ Planning Act. As part of this process, the Finger Plan was revised twice in 2017 and 2019. The latest version of the Finger plan was prepared as part of a larger policy package aiming at promoting growth in the Greater Copenhagen Region towards 2030. This paper argues that the recent revisions of the Finger Plan must be understood as part of the ongoing neoliberalization of spatial planning in Denmark, but that the Finger Plan, at the same time, has remained ‘immune’ to a more widespread neoliberalization in this process.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Planning Studies REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-

CiteScore

4.60

自引率

4.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： Planning, at urban, regional, national and international levels, faces new challenges, notably those related to the growth of globalisation as both an objective socio-economic process and a shift in policy-maker perceptions and modes of analysis. International Planning Studies (IPS) addresses these issues by publishing quality research in a variety of specific fields and from a range of theoretical and normative perspectives, which helps improve understanding of the actual and potential role of planning and planners in this context.