工作联盟的两面性:基于缓刑犯和缓刑监督官视角的定性研究

IF 0.8 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Annelies Sturm, V. de Vogel, M. Huibers
{"title":"工作联盟的两面性:基于缓刑犯和缓刑监督官视角的定性研究","authors":"Annelies Sturm, V. de Vogel, M. Huibers","doi":"10.1177/20662203211056486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The probationer–probation officer working alliance plays an important role in the outcome of probation supervision. This study explored the development of the working alliance between probationers and probation officers in the Netherlands, from the perspective of both probationers and probation officers. More specifically, we explored the significance of different aspects of the working alliance at the start of probation supervision and after a three-month period, as well as the role played by critical incidents during the supervisory process and their subsequent effect on the working alliance. Overall, the study showed that clarity over goals and restrictions was initially the most salient issue for both parties, and that after a three-month period the working alliance evolved into a trusting relationship. Several incidents were identified, probationers identified more positive moments and less negative moments than their PO counterparts. If these types of incidents are managed accordingly by the probation officer, then they can ultimately serve to strengthen the relationship.","PeriodicalId":44523,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Probation","volume":"14 1","pages":"40 - 59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two sides of the working alliance: A qualitative study from the perspective of both probationers and probation officers\",\"authors\":\"Annelies Sturm, V. de Vogel, M. Huibers\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20662203211056486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The probationer–probation officer working alliance plays an important role in the outcome of probation supervision. This study explored the development of the working alliance between probationers and probation officers in the Netherlands, from the perspective of both probationers and probation officers. More specifically, we explored the significance of different aspects of the working alliance at the start of probation supervision and after a three-month period, as well as the role played by critical incidents during the supervisory process and their subsequent effect on the working alliance. Overall, the study showed that clarity over goals and restrictions was initially the most salient issue for both parties, and that after a three-month period the working alliance evolved into a trusting relationship. Several incidents were identified, probationers identified more positive moments and less negative moments than their PO counterparts. If these types of incidents are managed accordingly by the probation officer, then they can ultimately serve to strengthen the relationship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Probation\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"40 - 59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Probation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20662203211056486\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Probation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20662203211056486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

缓刑犯-缓刑监督官工作联盟对缓刑监督的结果起着重要作用。本研究从缓刑犯和缓刑官的角度探讨了荷兰缓刑犯和假释官之间工作联盟的发展。更具体地说,我们探讨了缓刑监督开始时和三个月后工作联盟不同方面的意义,以及监督过程中关键事件所起的作用及其对工作联盟的后续影响。总的来说,研究表明,目标和限制的明确性最初是两党最突出的问题,三个月后,工作联盟演变成了信任关系。发现了几起事件,缓刑犯发现了比PO同行更多的积极时刻和更少的消极时刻。如果缓刑监督官对这些类型的事件进行相应的管理,那么它们最终可以加强关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two sides of the working alliance: A qualitative study from the perspective of both probationers and probation officers
The probationer–probation officer working alliance plays an important role in the outcome of probation supervision. This study explored the development of the working alliance between probationers and probation officers in the Netherlands, from the perspective of both probationers and probation officers. More specifically, we explored the significance of different aspects of the working alliance at the start of probation supervision and after a three-month period, as well as the role played by critical incidents during the supervisory process and their subsequent effect on the working alliance. Overall, the study showed that clarity over goals and restrictions was initially the most salient issue for both parties, and that after a three-month period the working alliance evolved into a trusting relationship. Several incidents were identified, probationers identified more positive moments and less negative moments than their PO counterparts. If these types of incidents are managed accordingly by the probation officer, then they can ultimately serve to strengthen the relationship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Probation
European Journal of Probation CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信