CorEvitas银屑病登记处患者银屑病评估工具的开发

Q3 Medicine
Wayne P Gulliver, Kyoungah See, Baojin Zhu, Bruce W Konicek, Ryan W Harrison, Robert R McLean, Samantha J Kerti, Russel T Burge, Craig L Leonardi
{"title":"CorEvitas银屑病登记处患者银屑病评估工具的开发","authors":"Wayne P Gulliver, Kyoungah See, Baojin Zhu, Bruce W Konicek, Ryan W Harrison, Robert R McLean, Samantha J Kerti, Russel T Burge, Craig L Leonardi","doi":"10.1177/24755303231155118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dermatologists would benefit from an easy to use psoriasis severity assessment tool in the clinic.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop psoriasis assessment tools to predict PASI and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) using simple measures typically collected in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data included 33 605 dermatology visits among plaque psoriasis patients enrolled in the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry (4/15/15-7/11/20). Performance (adjusted coefficient of determination [R<sup>2</sup> <sub>adj</sub>], root mean square error [RMSE]) in predicting PASI and DLQI was assessed for 16 different linear regression models (specified a priori based on combinations of BSA, Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA], itch, skin pain, patient global assessment, age, sex, BMI, comorbidity index, prior biologic use), and 2 stepwise selection models and 1 elastic net model based on 56 available variables. For each prediction model, concordance (sensitivity, specificity) of predicted PASI75, PASI90 and DLQI 0/1 with observed values was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean (SD) age, BSA, and PASI were 51 (14) years, 6 (11), and 4 (6), respectively; 46% were women, and 87% were biologic experienced. A model predicting PASI using BSA plus IGA performed best among a priori specified models (R<sup>2</sup> <sub>adj</sub> = .72, RMSE = 2.93) and only marginally worse than models including additional variables (R<sup>2</sup> <sub>adj</sub> range .64-.74, RMSE range 2.82-3.36). Models including IGA had the best concordance between predicted and observed PASI75 (sensitivity range 83-85%, specificity range 88-91%) and PASI90 (sensitivity range 76-82%, specificity range 94-98%). DLQI prediction was limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An assessment tool for psoriasis including BSA and IGA may be an ideal option to predict PASI in a clinic setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":36656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis","volume":"8 1","pages":"74-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11361488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of Psoriasis Assessment Tools Among Patients in the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry.\",\"authors\":\"Wayne P Gulliver, Kyoungah See, Baojin Zhu, Bruce W Konicek, Ryan W Harrison, Robert R McLean, Samantha J Kerti, Russel T Burge, Craig L Leonardi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/24755303231155118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dermatologists would benefit from an easy to use psoriasis severity assessment tool in the clinic.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop psoriasis assessment tools to predict PASI and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) using simple measures typically collected in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data included 33 605 dermatology visits among plaque psoriasis patients enrolled in the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry (4/15/15-7/11/20). Performance (adjusted coefficient of determination [R<sup>2</sup> <sub>adj</sub>], root mean square error [RMSE]) in predicting PASI and DLQI was assessed for 16 different linear regression models (specified a priori based on combinations of BSA, Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA], itch, skin pain, patient global assessment, age, sex, BMI, comorbidity index, prior biologic use), and 2 stepwise selection models and 1 elastic net model based on 56 available variables. For each prediction model, concordance (sensitivity, specificity) of predicted PASI75, PASI90 and DLQI 0/1 with observed values was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean (SD) age, BSA, and PASI were 51 (14) years, 6 (11), and 4 (6), respectively; 46% were women, and 87% were biologic experienced. A model predicting PASI using BSA plus IGA performed best among a priori specified models (R<sup>2</sup> <sub>adj</sub> = .72, RMSE = 2.93) and only marginally worse than models including additional variables (R<sup>2</sup> <sub>adj</sub> range .64-.74, RMSE range 2.82-3.36). Models including IGA had the best concordance between predicted and observed PASI75 (sensitivity range 83-85%, specificity range 88-91%) and PASI90 (sensitivity range 76-82%, specificity range 94-98%). DLQI prediction was limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An assessment tool for psoriasis including BSA and IGA may be an ideal option to predict PASI in a clinic setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"74-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11361488/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/24755303231155118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24755303231155118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景皮肤科医生将受益于临床上易于使用的银屑病严重程度评估工具。目的开发银屑病评估工具,利用临床上常见的简单测量方法预测PASI和皮肤病学生活质量指数(DLQI)。方法数据包括在CorEvitas银屑病登记处登记的斑块型银屑病患者中的33605次皮肤科就诊(4/15/25/7/11/20)。针对16个不同的线性回归模型(根据BSA、研究者的整体评估[IGA]、瘙痒、皮肤疼痛、患者整体评估、年龄、性别、BMI、共病指数、既往生物学应用的组合预先指定)评估了预测PASI和DLQI的表现(调整后的决定系数[R2adj]、均方根误差[RMSE]),以及基于56个可用变量的2个逐步选择模型和1个弹性网模型。对于每个预测模型,评估预测的PASI75、PASI90和DLQI 0/1与观察值的一致性(敏感性、特异性)。结果平均年龄(SD)、BSA和PASI分别为51(14)岁、6(11)岁和4(6)岁;46%为女性,87%为生物学经验。使用BSA加IGA预测PASI的模型在先验指定模型中表现最好(R2adj=.72,RMSE=2.93),仅略差于包括额外变量的模型(R2adj范围.64-.74,RMSE范围2.82-3.36)。包括IGA的模型在预测和观察到的PASI75(灵敏度范围83-85%,特异性范围88-91%)和PASI90之间的一致性最好(敏感性范围76-82%,特异性范围94-98%)。DLQI预测有限。结论银屑病的评估工具,包括BSA和IGA,可能是在临床环境中预测PASI的理想选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of Psoriasis Assessment Tools Among Patients in the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry.

Background: Dermatologists would benefit from an easy to use psoriasis severity assessment tool in the clinic.

Objective: To develop psoriasis assessment tools to predict PASI and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) using simple measures typically collected in clinical practice.

Methods: Data included 33 605 dermatology visits among plaque psoriasis patients enrolled in the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry (4/15/15-7/11/20). Performance (adjusted coefficient of determination [R2 adj], root mean square error [RMSE]) in predicting PASI and DLQI was assessed for 16 different linear regression models (specified a priori based on combinations of BSA, Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA], itch, skin pain, patient global assessment, age, sex, BMI, comorbidity index, prior biologic use), and 2 stepwise selection models and 1 elastic net model based on 56 available variables. For each prediction model, concordance (sensitivity, specificity) of predicted PASI75, PASI90 and DLQI 0/1 with observed values was evaluated.

Results: Mean (SD) age, BSA, and PASI were 51 (14) years, 6 (11), and 4 (6), respectively; 46% were women, and 87% were biologic experienced. A model predicting PASI using BSA plus IGA performed best among a priori specified models (R2 adj = .72, RMSE = 2.93) and only marginally worse than models including additional variables (R2 adj range .64-.74, RMSE range 2.82-3.36). Models including IGA had the best concordance between predicted and observed PASI75 (sensitivity range 83-85%, specificity range 88-91%) and PASI90 (sensitivity range 76-82%, specificity range 94-98%). DLQI prediction was limited.

Conclusion: An assessment tool for psoriasis including BSA and IGA may be an ideal option to predict PASI in a clinic setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信