改进小学教师培训:在职教师与大学教授之间的协议与分歧

Q4 Social Sciences
J. Sureda-Negre, M. Oliver-Trobat, R. Comas-Forgas
{"title":"改进小学教师培训:在职教师与大学教授之间的协议与分歧","authors":"J. Sureda-Negre, M. Oliver-Trobat, R. Comas-Forgas","doi":"10.7459/EPT/42.2.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within an action research framework involving primary teachers and university professors, based on a Delphi study, those in charge of training future primary school teachers (at a Spanish university) identified and agreed upon measures that they thought were appropriate for improving\n the training programs in which they participated. A total of 84 different items were presented and discussed. A reasonable level of consensus was reached regarding 45 of these items. Data gathered includes guidelines on how to improve the training program and shows the benefit of having teachers\n and university professors reflect, contrast and assess their points of view.","PeriodicalId":35223,"journal":{"name":"Educational Practice & Theory","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the Training of Primary School Teachers: Agreements and Disagreements Between Active Teachers and University Professors\",\"authors\":\"J. Sureda-Negre, M. Oliver-Trobat, R. Comas-Forgas\",\"doi\":\"10.7459/EPT/42.2.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Within an action research framework involving primary teachers and university professors, based on a Delphi study, those in charge of training future primary school teachers (at a Spanish university) identified and agreed upon measures that they thought were appropriate for improving\\n the training programs in which they participated. A total of 84 different items were presented and discussed. A reasonable level of consensus was reached regarding 45 of these items. Data gathered includes guidelines on how to improve the training program and shows the benefit of having teachers\\n and university professors reflect, contrast and assess their points of view.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Practice & Theory\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Practice & Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7459/EPT/42.2.06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Practice & Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7459/EPT/42.2.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在一个涉及小学教师和大学教授的行动研究框架内,根据德尔菲研究,负责培训未来小学教师的人员(在西班牙一所大学)确定并商定了他们认为适合改进他们参加的培训计划的措施。共提出并讨论了84个不同的项目。就其中45个项目达成了合理程度的共识。收集的数据包括如何改进培训计划的指导方针,并显示了让教师和大学教授反思、对比和评估他们的观点的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving the Training of Primary School Teachers: Agreements and Disagreements Between Active Teachers and University Professors
Within an action research framework involving primary teachers and university professors, based on a Delphi study, those in charge of training future primary school teachers (at a Spanish university) identified and agreed upon measures that they thought were appropriate for improving the training programs in which they participated. A total of 84 different items were presented and discussed. A reasonable level of consensus was reached regarding 45 of these items. Data gathered includes guidelines on how to improve the training program and shows the benefit of having teachers and university professors reflect, contrast and assess their points of view.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Practice & Theory
Educational Practice & Theory Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Educational Practice and Theory in its 40th year of publication continues as an important independent forum for original ideas in education research relevant to aspects of education including K-12 schools, education reforms, teaching methods and educational leadership. Educational Practice and Theory is: -a refereed journal with a distinguished panel of consulting editors; -comparative in focus; -innovative, path-finding and provocative; -diverse with reports on a wide range of countries and themes, and -applied and theoretical.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信