跨文化法律话语中的问题：美国联邦和原住民部落刑法

Q2 Social Sciences

Global Jurist Pub Date : 2022-09-23 DOI:10.1515/gj-2022-0033

J. Brewer

{"title":"跨文化法律话语中的问题：美国联邦和原住民部落刑法","authors":"J. Brewer","doi":"10.1515/gj-2022-0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Through examination of conflict of laws as to U.S. federal courts and tribal law, this study highlights the impact of culture upon legal meaning. Disparities stem from long-standing norms which underpin legal concepts. These terms which give rise to legal philosophy and the judicial process defy clear English interpretation. Examples include the Latin term mens rea which serves as the foundation for Anglo-American punishment theory, and the Navajo term hózhó from which all conceptualizations of social order emanate. An exploration of these examples in the context of a recent case underscores the close link between law and culture.","PeriodicalId":34941,"journal":{"name":"Global Jurist","volume":"23 1","pages":"7 - 21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problems in Cross-Cultural Legal Discourse: U.S. Federal and Native American Tribal Criminal Law\",\"authors\":\"J. Brewer\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/gj-2022-0033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Through examination of conflict of laws as to U.S. federal courts and tribal law, this study highlights the impact of culture upon legal meaning. Disparities stem from long-standing norms which underpin legal concepts. These terms which give rise to legal philosophy and the judicial process defy clear English interpretation. Examples include the Latin term mens rea which serves as the foundation for Anglo-American punishment theory, and the Navajo term hózhó from which all conceptualizations of social order emanate. An exploration of these examples in the context of a recent case underscores the close link between law and culture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34941,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Jurist\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"7 - 21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Jurist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/gj-2022-0033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Jurist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/gj-2022-0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要通过考察美国联邦法院和部落法的法律冲突，本研究强调了文化对法律意义的影响。差异源于作为法律概念基础的长期规范。这些术语产生了法律哲学和司法程序，与清晰的英语解释相悖。例子包括拉丁语术语mens rea，它是英美惩罚理论的基础，以及纳瓦霍语术语hózhó，所有社会秩序的概念都源于此。在最近的一个案例中对这些例子的探讨突显了法律和文化之间的密切联系。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Problems in Cross-Cultural Legal Discourse: U.S. Federal and Native American Tribal Criminal Law

Abstract Through examination of conflict of laws as to U.S. federal courts and tribal law, this study highlights the impact of culture upon legal meaning. Disparities stem from long-standing norms which underpin legal concepts. These terms which give rise to legal philosophy and the judicial process defy clear English interpretation. Examples include the Latin term mens rea which serves as the foundation for Anglo-American punishment theory, and the Navajo term hózhó from which all conceptualizations of social order emanate. An exploration of these examples in the context of a recent case underscores the close link between law and culture.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Global Jurist Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Global Jurist offers a forum for scholarly cyber-debate on issues of comparative law, law and economics, international law, law and society, and legal anthropology. Edited by an international board of leading comparative law scholars from all the continents, Global Jurist is mindful of globalization and respectful of cultural differences. We will develop a truly international community of legal scholars where linguistic and cultural barriers are overcome and legal issues are finally discussed outside of the narrow limits imposed by positivism, parochialism, ethnocentrism, imperialism and chauvinism in the law. Submission is welcome from all over the world and particularly encouraged from the Global South.