现代司法:印尼最高法院通过数字化维护公平审判原则的挑战

William Sibarani
{"title":"现代司法:印尼最高法院通过数字化维护公平审判原则的挑战","authors":"William Sibarani","doi":"10.21776/ub.blj.2023.010.01.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": As we have seen, it is essential to widen digitization in order to bestow better access to public information contained in Indonesian courts for a variety of purposes. Court modernization through digitization benefits not only the judges but also both attorneys and litigants. To this end, Indonesia’s Supreme Court has progressed above and beyond to embody the principle of equality before the law by integrating technological development into the judicial process with. In fact, qualified policies do not always govern the implementation of technology, resulting in discrepancies between policy and implementation. Using a statutory, case, and historical approach, these article will assess whether it is reasonable and efficient to adopt this technology in Indonesian courts. Qualified implementing regulations and tiered socialization have not been utilized in the judicial context to support law enforcement’s readiness to carry out the judicial process electronically. This article further addresses the safety of personal and judicial data, and the security of electronic court proceedings, bearing in mind that applications of information technology should be considerate of the community’s need for access to justice as well as the court’s interests in preserving its authority. Nonetheless, given that technology has already been implemented to enhance access, a variety of actions aimed at bolstering both policy issuance and reforming the technological infrastructure will encourage the court to conduct trials in a safe and sound manner.","PeriodicalId":31451,"journal":{"name":"Brawijaya Law Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modern Justice: Indonesia’s Supreme Court’s Challenges to Uphold Fair Trial Principles Through Digitalization\",\"authors\":\"William Sibarani\",\"doi\":\"10.21776/ub.blj.2023.010.01.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": As we have seen, it is essential to widen digitization in order to bestow better access to public information contained in Indonesian courts for a variety of purposes. Court modernization through digitization benefits not only the judges but also both attorneys and litigants. To this end, Indonesia’s Supreme Court has progressed above and beyond to embody the principle of equality before the law by integrating technological development into the judicial process with. In fact, qualified policies do not always govern the implementation of technology, resulting in discrepancies between policy and implementation. Using a statutory, case, and historical approach, these article will assess whether it is reasonable and efficient to adopt this technology in Indonesian courts. Qualified implementing regulations and tiered socialization have not been utilized in the judicial context to support law enforcement’s readiness to carry out the judicial process electronically. This article further addresses the safety of personal and judicial data, and the security of electronic court proceedings, bearing in mind that applications of information technology should be considerate of the community’s need for access to justice as well as the court’s interests in preserving its authority. Nonetheless, given that technology has already been implemented to enhance access, a variety of actions aimed at bolstering both policy issuance and reforming the technological infrastructure will encourage the court to conduct trials in a safe and sound manner.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brawijaya Law Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brawijaya Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2023.010.01.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brawijaya Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2023.010.01.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

:正如我们所看到的,必须扩大数字化,以便更好地获取印度尼西亚法院中的公共信息,用于各种目的。通过数字化实现法院现代化不仅有利于法官,也有利于律师和诉讼当事人。为此,印度尼西亚最高法院通过将技术发展纳入司法程序,在体现法律面前人人平等的原则方面取得了巨大进步。事实上,合格的政策并不总是管理技术的实施,这导致了政策和实施之间的差异。本文将采用法定、案例和历史方法,评估在印度尼西亚法院采用这项技术是否合理有效。在司法环境中,没有利用合格的执行条例和分级社会化来支持执法部门准备以电子方式执行司法程序。本条进一步论述了个人和司法数据的安全以及电子法庭程序的安全,同时铭记信息技术的应用应考虑到社区诉诸司法的需要以及法院维护其权威的利益。尽管如此,鉴于技术已经被用于提高获取率,旨在支持政策发布和改革技术基础设施的各种行动将鼓励法院以安全和稳健的方式进行审判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modern Justice: Indonesia’s Supreme Court’s Challenges to Uphold Fair Trial Principles Through Digitalization
: As we have seen, it is essential to widen digitization in order to bestow better access to public information contained in Indonesian courts for a variety of purposes. Court modernization through digitization benefits not only the judges but also both attorneys and litigants. To this end, Indonesia’s Supreme Court has progressed above and beyond to embody the principle of equality before the law by integrating technological development into the judicial process with. In fact, qualified policies do not always govern the implementation of technology, resulting in discrepancies between policy and implementation. Using a statutory, case, and historical approach, these article will assess whether it is reasonable and efficient to adopt this technology in Indonesian courts. Qualified implementing regulations and tiered socialization have not been utilized in the judicial context to support law enforcement’s readiness to carry out the judicial process electronically. This article further addresses the safety of personal and judicial data, and the security of electronic court proceedings, bearing in mind that applications of information technology should be considerate of the community’s need for access to justice as well as the court’s interests in preserving its authority. Nonetheless, given that technology has already been implemented to enhance access, a variety of actions aimed at bolstering both policy issuance and reforming the technological infrastructure will encourage the court to conduct trials in a safe and sound manner.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信