童话般的尾巴:150年亏损的教训

IF 1.1 4区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
A. Alankar, Daniel Ding, Allan Z. Maymin, Philip Z. Maymin, M. Scholes
{"title":"童话般的尾巴:150年亏损的教训","authors":"A. Alankar, Daniel Ding, Allan Z. Maymin, Philip Z. Maymin, M. Scholes","doi":"10.3905/jpm.2023.1.503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors identify, examine, and categorize the largest downside tail events in the US equity market over the past 150 years using monthly data. They define a downside tail event as any peak-to-trough loss of at least 15%. Using Gaussian mixture models to cluster the tail events based on predrawdown observables, five distinct environments emerge: hiking, easing, disinflationary, inflationary, and exuberance. The authors further distinguish gamma events as those in which a hedging policy of rolling short-term option positions would have recovered more than half of the drawdown and find that they all occur only in hiking or exuberance environments, with the exception of the 2020 COVID-19 lockdown event, which can be thought of as a “known unknown”. Such gamma events can be distinguished ex-ante from nongamma events with a two-factor logistic model based on the equity-fixed income correlation and the change in the geopolitical risk index over the year preceding the starting peak of the drawdown. A large increase in geopolitical risk and/or equity-fixed income correlation, reflective of a market environment driven by fewer factors and hence more fragile, indicates a greater likelihood that a future drawdown is of a gamma type. This model can help recommend if gamma or delta protection should be sought. Finally, in addition to categorizing and explaining the causes and drivers of downside tail events, we also determine which types of tail hedge strategies worked, and how well, for each tail event. The analysis provides important information to guide the use of tail-hedging strategies, which can accelerate compounding.","PeriodicalId":53670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Portfolio Management","volume":"49 1","pages":"8 - 34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fairy Tails: Lessons from 150 Years of Drawdowns\",\"authors\":\"A. Alankar, Daniel Ding, Allan Z. Maymin, Philip Z. Maymin, M. Scholes\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jpm.2023.1.503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors identify, examine, and categorize the largest downside tail events in the US equity market over the past 150 years using monthly data. They define a downside tail event as any peak-to-trough loss of at least 15%. Using Gaussian mixture models to cluster the tail events based on predrawdown observables, five distinct environments emerge: hiking, easing, disinflationary, inflationary, and exuberance. The authors further distinguish gamma events as those in which a hedging policy of rolling short-term option positions would have recovered more than half of the drawdown and find that they all occur only in hiking or exuberance environments, with the exception of the 2020 COVID-19 lockdown event, which can be thought of as a “known unknown”. Such gamma events can be distinguished ex-ante from nongamma events with a two-factor logistic model based on the equity-fixed income correlation and the change in the geopolitical risk index over the year preceding the starting peak of the drawdown. A large increase in geopolitical risk and/or equity-fixed income correlation, reflective of a market environment driven by fewer factors and hence more fragile, indicates a greater likelihood that a future drawdown is of a gamma type. This model can help recommend if gamma or delta protection should be sought. Finally, in addition to categorizing and explaining the causes and drivers of downside tail events, we also determine which types of tail hedge strategies worked, and how well, for each tail event. The analysis provides important information to guide the use of tail-hedging strategies, which can accelerate compounding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Portfolio Management\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"8 - 34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Portfolio Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2023.1.503\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Portfolio Management","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2023.1.503","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作者使用月度数据对过去150年来美国股市最大的下跌尾部事件进行了识别、检查和分类。他们将下行尾部事件定义为任何至少15%的峰谷损失。使用高斯混合模型根据提取前的可观察性对尾部事件进行聚类,出现了五种不同的环境:徒步旅行、宽松、抑制通货膨胀、通货膨胀和繁荣。作者进一步将伽马事件区分为滚动短期期权头寸的对冲政策将恢复一半以上的下跌,并发现它们都只发生在徒步旅行或繁荣的环境中,但2020年新冠肺炎封锁事件除外,这可以被视为“已知未知”。根据股权固定收益相关性和下降开始峰值前一年地缘政治风险指数的变化,可以通过双因素逻辑模型预先将此类伽马事件与非伽马事件区分开来。地缘政治风险和/或股票固定收益相关性的大幅增加,反映了由较少因素驱动的市场环境,因此更加脆弱,表明未来的缩编更可能是伽马型的。该模型有助于推荐是否应寻求伽马或德尔塔保护。最后,除了对下行尾部事件的原因和驱动因素进行分类和解释外,我们还确定了哪种类型的尾部对冲策略有效,以及每种尾部事件的效果如何。该分析为指导尾部对冲策略的使用提供了重要信息,尾部对冲策略可以加速复合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fairy Tails: Lessons from 150 Years of Drawdowns
The authors identify, examine, and categorize the largest downside tail events in the US equity market over the past 150 years using monthly data. They define a downside tail event as any peak-to-trough loss of at least 15%. Using Gaussian mixture models to cluster the tail events based on predrawdown observables, five distinct environments emerge: hiking, easing, disinflationary, inflationary, and exuberance. The authors further distinguish gamma events as those in which a hedging policy of rolling short-term option positions would have recovered more than half of the drawdown and find that they all occur only in hiking or exuberance environments, with the exception of the 2020 COVID-19 lockdown event, which can be thought of as a “known unknown”. Such gamma events can be distinguished ex-ante from nongamma events with a two-factor logistic model based on the equity-fixed income correlation and the change in the geopolitical risk index over the year preceding the starting peak of the drawdown. A large increase in geopolitical risk and/or equity-fixed income correlation, reflective of a market environment driven by fewer factors and hence more fragile, indicates a greater likelihood that a future drawdown is of a gamma type. This model can help recommend if gamma or delta protection should be sought. Finally, in addition to categorizing and explaining the causes and drivers of downside tail events, we also determine which types of tail hedge strategies worked, and how well, for each tail event. The analysis provides important information to guide the use of tail-hedging strategies, which can accelerate compounding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Portfolio Management
Journal of Portfolio Management Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
28.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Founded by Peter Bernstein in 1974, The Journal of Portfolio Management (JPM) is the definitive source of thought-provoking analysis and practical techniques in institutional investing. It offers cutting-edge research on asset allocation, performance measurement, market trends, risk management, portfolio optimization, and more. Each quarterly issue of JPM features articles by the most renowned researchers and practitioners—including Nobel laureates—whose works define modern portfolio theory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信