真正扩大参与？Walk1916项目中使用公众投票选择内容的审查

Q1 Arts and Humanities

Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage Pub Date : 2020-04-02 DOI:10.1080/20518196.2019.1705023

Amber L. Cushing

{"title":"真正扩大参与？Walk1916项目中使用公众投票选择内容的审查","authors":"Amber L. Cushing","doi":"10.1080/20518196.2019.1705023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the past few years, crowdsourcing has developed a reputation for its ability to ‘widen participation’ by engaging the public in archival practices or engage non-professionals as ‘citizen archivists’ to complete archival work. However, does public voting truly widen participation? If so, how? While public voting may appear to meet the aims of gathering many opinions for its ease of use and low barrier to participation, is it really a decent method to widen participation? And further, are the results of the public voting of use to potential users who engage with the results of a project? This paper reports on the use of public voting as a method to gather opinion for the Walk1916 mobile walking tour app, which was developed to enhance use of and access to digital content in archival collections.","PeriodicalId":52158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage","volume":"7 1","pages":"107 - 119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20518196.2019.1705023","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Truly widening participation? A review of the use of public voting for selection of content in the Walk1916 project\",\"authors\":\"Amber L. Cushing\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20518196.2019.1705023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In the past few years, crowdsourcing has developed a reputation for its ability to ‘widen participation’ by engaging the public in archival practices or engage non-professionals as ‘citizen archivists’ to complete archival work. However, does public voting truly widen participation? If so, how? While public voting may appear to meet the aims of gathering many opinions for its ease of use and low barrier to participation, is it really a decent method to widen participation? And further, are the results of the public voting of use to potential users who engage with the results of a project? This paper reports on the use of public voting as a method to gather opinion for the Walk1916 mobile walking tour app, which was developed to enhance use of and access to digital content in archival collections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"107 - 119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20518196.2019.1705023\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20518196.2019.1705023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20518196.2019.1705023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要在过去的几年里，众包通过让公众参与档案实践或让非专业人士作为“公民档案管理员”来完成档案工作，从而“扩大参与度”，从而赢得了声誉。然而，公众投票真的能扩大参与度吗？如果是，如何？虽然公众投票似乎可以达到收集许多意见的目的，因为它易于使用，参与门槛低，但这真的是一种扩大参与的体面方法吗？此外，公众投票的结果是否对参与项目结果的潜在用户有用？本文报道了使用公众投票作为Walk1916移动徒步旅行应用程序收集意见的方法，该应用程序是为了增强档案收藏中数字内容的使用和访问。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Truly widening participation? A review of the use of public voting for selection of content in the Walk1916 project

ABSTRACT In the past few years, crowdsourcing has developed a reputation for its ability to ‘widen participation’ by engaging the public in archival practices or engage non-professionals as ‘citizen archivists’ to complete archival work. However, does public voting truly widen participation? If so, how? While public voting may appear to meet the aims of gathering many opinions for its ease of use and low barrier to participation, is it really a decent method to widen participation? And further, are the results of the public voting of use to potential users who engage with the results of a project? This paper reports on the use of public voting as a method to gather opinion for the Walk1916 mobile walking tour app, which was developed to enhance use of and access to digital content in archival collections.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage is a new journal intended for participants, volunteers, practitioners, and academics involved in the many projects and practices broadly defined as ‘community archaeology’. This is intended to include the excavation, management, stewardship or presentation of archaeological and heritage resources that include major elements of community participation, collaboration, or outreach. The journal recognises the growing interest in voluntary activism in archaeological research and interpretation, and seeks to create a platform for discussion about the efficacy and importance of such work as well as a showcase for the dissemination of community archaeology projects (which might offer models of best practice for others). By inviting papers relating to theory and practice from across the world, the journal seeks to demonstrate both the diversity of community archaeology and its commonalities in process and associated theory. We seek contributions from members of the voluntary sector as well as those involved in archaeological practice and academia.