{"title":"危险的","authors":"A. Prisoner","doi":"10.18192/jpp.v30i2.6295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I do not pretend to have an ultimate answer. I can only set out some of the facts, rules and issues relevant to Neve's designation as dangerous. I will consider the background of the case, the purpose of the dangerous offender provisions, the hearing and some legal and political issues that arise from the case. I hope to show that while there was evidence on which Neve could have been found to be a dangerous offender, there was also a basis for Murray J. to have exercised his discretion not to find Neve to be a dangerous offender.","PeriodicalId":90234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of prisoners on prisons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dangerous\",\"authors\":\"A. Prisoner\",\"doi\":\"10.18192/jpp.v30i2.6295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I do not pretend to have an ultimate answer. I can only set out some of the facts, rules and issues relevant to Neve's designation as dangerous. I will consider the background of the case, the purpose of the dangerous offender provisions, the hearing and some legal and political issues that arise from the case. I hope to show that while there was evidence on which Neve could have been found to be a dangerous offender, there was also a basis for Murray J. to have exercised his discretion not to find Neve to be a dangerous offender.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of prisoners on prisons\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of prisoners on prisons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18192/jpp.v30i2.6295\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of prisoners on prisons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18192/jpp.v30i2.6295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
I do not pretend to have an ultimate answer. I can only set out some of the facts, rules and issues relevant to Neve's designation as dangerous. I will consider the background of the case, the purpose of the dangerous offender provisions, the hearing and some legal and political issues that arise from the case. I hope to show that while there was evidence on which Neve could have been found to be a dangerous offender, there was also a basis for Murray J. to have exercised his discretion not to find Neve to be a dangerous offender.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
