{"title":"从系统性金融风险到电网弹性:在电力投资策略和监管流程中嵌入压力测试","authors":"M. DeMenno, R. Broderick, Robert Jeffers","doi":"10.1080/23789689.2021.2015833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In response to major system disruptions, policymakers have prioritized enhancing the resilience of the financial services and energy sectors, with a particular focus on banking and electricity regulation. In both sectors, ‘regulating for resilience’ requires bridging system-level policy goals and institution-level policy instruments as well as tailoring institutional requirements to firms’ idiosyncratic risk profiles. Stress testing has enabled financial regulators to partially overcome these analytical and governance challenges, resulting in better capitalized and managed banks, increased attentiveness to systemic risk, and a more resilient financial system. Recognizing the opportunity for translation across sectors and disciplines, this article develops a novel methodology and an actionable policy framework for embedding stress testing in electric utility investment strategies and regulatory processes. It demonstrates how stress testing could enhance the resilience and sustainability of the U.S. electric grid and explores opportunities for regulatory coordination in multi-sector analyses of climate-related risk and resilience.","PeriodicalId":45395,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From systemic financial risk to grid resilience: Embedding stress testing in electric utility investment strategies and regulatory processes\",\"authors\":\"M. DeMenno, R. Broderick, Robert Jeffers\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23789689.2021.2015833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In response to major system disruptions, policymakers have prioritized enhancing the resilience of the financial services and energy sectors, with a particular focus on banking and electricity regulation. In both sectors, ‘regulating for resilience’ requires bridging system-level policy goals and institution-level policy instruments as well as tailoring institutional requirements to firms’ idiosyncratic risk profiles. Stress testing has enabled financial regulators to partially overcome these analytical and governance challenges, resulting in better capitalized and managed banks, increased attentiveness to systemic risk, and a more resilient financial system. Recognizing the opportunity for translation across sectors and disciplines, this article develops a novel methodology and an actionable policy framework for embedding stress testing in electric utility investment strategies and regulatory processes. It demonstrates how stress testing could enhance the resilience and sustainability of the U.S. electric grid and explores opportunities for regulatory coordination in multi-sector analyses of climate-related risk and resilience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2021.2015833\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2021.2015833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
From systemic financial risk to grid resilience: Embedding stress testing in electric utility investment strategies and regulatory processes
ABSTRACT In response to major system disruptions, policymakers have prioritized enhancing the resilience of the financial services and energy sectors, with a particular focus on banking and electricity regulation. In both sectors, ‘regulating for resilience’ requires bridging system-level policy goals and institution-level policy instruments as well as tailoring institutional requirements to firms’ idiosyncratic risk profiles. Stress testing has enabled financial regulators to partially overcome these analytical and governance challenges, resulting in better capitalized and managed banks, increased attentiveness to systemic risk, and a more resilient financial system. Recognizing the opportunity for translation across sectors and disciplines, this article develops a novel methodology and an actionable policy framework for embedding stress testing in electric utility investment strategies and regulatory processes. It demonstrates how stress testing could enhance the resilience and sustainability of the U.S. electric grid and explores opportunities for regulatory coordination in multi-sector analyses of climate-related risk and resilience.
期刊介绍:
Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on the sustainable development of resilient communities.
Sustainability is defined in relation to the ability of infrastructure to address the needs of the present without sacrificing the ability of future generations to meet their needs. Resilience is considered in relation to both natural hazards (like earthquakes, tsunami, hurricanes, cyclones, tornado, flooding and drought) and anthropogenic hazards (like human errors and malevolent attacks.) Resilience is taken to depend both on the performance of the built and modified natural environment and on the contextual characteristics of social, economic and political institutions. Sustainability and resilience are considered both for physical and non-physical infrastructure.