Amal Miqdadi, Imad Abousahfa, Mourad Nafaa, Mostapha Noussair, S. Jidane, L. Belyamani
{"title":"Pfizer-BioNTech抗COVID-19疫苗接种后的即时过敏反应:病例报告","authors":"Amal Miqdadi, Imad Abousahfa, Mourad Nafaa, Mostapha Noussair, S. Jidane, L. Belyamani","doi":"10.2174/1573398x18666220922101735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nTo date, the vaccine is the only weapon to stop the global pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2. But, several clinical cases of complications have been reported in the literature especially allergic reactions.\n\n\n\nWe report a case of 35-year-old woman, known asthmatic with history of a chronic urticaria, an allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and an angioedema after taking NSAIDs. The patient presented 10 minutes after vaccination by Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, an immediate allergic reaction complicated 12 hours after, by an angioedema.\n\n\n\nDuring the first wave of COVID-19, and after initiation of the vaccination program in Morocco, vaccinating people with severe allergies was not recommended. This reality was changed after the second wave of SARS-CoV-2 Delta, on condition of doing it under medical monitoring. We should propose to all risky persons to take a premedication if needed to avoid such reactions considering the benefits incurred. The use of anti-histamines seems to be necessary. But as in our patient’s case, anti-histamines alone were not sufficient to avoid this local reaction. They probably reduced the intensity of the reaction but did not avoid it. Therefore, we should propose a combination of drugs made by corticosteroids and anti-histamines as a premedication may be a safe alternative to the risky patients and last but not least a close monitoring should be proposed.\n\n\n\nThe main purpose of this case if to raise awareness of this side effect among practitioners and make them capable to managing it correctly.\n","PeriodicalId":44030,"journal":{"name":"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An immediate allergic reaction following the anti-COVID-19 vaccine Pfizer-BioNTech : A case report\",\"authors\":\"Amal Miqdadi, Imad Abousahfa, Mourad Nafaa, Mostapha Noussair, S. Jidane, L. Belyamani\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1573398x18666220922101735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nTo date, the vaccine is the only weapon to stop the global pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2. But, several clinical cases of complications have been reported in the literature especially allergic reactions.\\n\\n\\n\\nWe report a case of 35-year-old woman, known asthmatic with history of a chronic urticaria, an allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and an angioedema after taking NSAIDs. The patient presented 10 minutes after vaccination by Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, an immediate allergic reaction complicated 12 hours after, by an angioedema.\\n\\n\\n\\nDuring the first wave of COVID-19, and after initiation of the vaccination program in Morocco, vaccinating people with severe allergies was not recommended. This reality was changed after the second wave of SARS-CoV-2 Delta, on condition of doing it under medical monitoring. We should propose to all risky persons to take a premedication if needed to avoid such reactions considering the benefits incurred. The use of anti-histamines seems to be necessary. But as in our patient’s case, anti-histamines alone were not sufficient to avoid this local reaction. They probably reduced the intensity of the reaction but did not avoid it. Therefore, we should propose a combination of drugs made by corticosteroids and anti-histamines as a premedication may be a safe alternative to the risky patients and last but not least a close monitoring should be proposed.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe main purpose of this case if to raise awareness of this side effect among practitioners and make them capable to managing it correctly.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":44030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573398x18666220922101735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573398x18666220922101735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
An immediate allergic reaction following the anti-COVID-19 vaccine Pfizer-BioNTech : A case report
To date, the vaccine is the only weapon to stop the global pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2. But, several clinical cases of complications have been reported in the literature especially allergic reactions.
We report a case of 35-year-old woman, known asthmatic with history of a chronic urticaria, an allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and an angioedema after taking NSAIDs. The patient presented 10 minutes after vaccination by Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, an immediate allergic reaction complicated 12 hours after, by an angioedema.
During the first wave of COVID-19, and after initiation of the vaccination program in Morocco, vaccinating people with severe allergies was not recommended. This reality was changed after the second wave of SARS-CoV-2 Delta, on condition of doing it under medical monitoring. We should propose to all risky persons to take a premedication if needed to avoid such reactions considering the benefits incurred. The use of anti-histamines seems to be necessary. But as in our patient’s case, anti-histamines alone were not sufficient to avoid this local reaction. They probably reduced the intensity of the reaction but did not avoid it. Therefore, we should propose a combination of drugs made by corticosteroids and anti-histamines as a premedication may be a safe alternative to the risky patients and last but not least a close monitoring should be proposed.
The main purpose of this case if to raise awareness of this side effect among practitioners and make them capable to managing it correctly.
期刊介绍:
Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances on respiratory diseases and its related areas e.g. pharmacology, pathogenesis, clinical care, and therapy. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to clinical research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in respiratory medicine.