糖尿病周围神经病变患者口服苯硫胺300mg与肌内硫胺的比较

M. E. Hefnawy, H. Ramadan, Dina Rabie, A. Effat
{"title":"糖尿病周围神经病变患者口服苯硫胺300mg与肌内硫胺的比较","authors":"M. E. Hefnawy, H. Ramadan, Dina Rabie, A. Effat","doi":"10.15226/2374-6890/9/1/001156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This is a prospective, pilot, open-label, interventional, comparative, randomized study, enrolled 60 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) to assess the effect of different doses of oral vitamin B containing Benfotiamine 300 mg versus intramuscular B vitamins containing watersoluble Thiamine HCl. Methods Patients ≥ 18 years with T2DM with Peripheral Neuropathy, divided into 3 groups; A & B (Benfotiamine 300 mg) and group C (Thiamine HCl), which were sub-divided to include patients with HbA1c less or more than 8 %. Patients were evaluated at baseline, after 2.5 hours, six days, and two weeks. Results Blood vitamin B1 increased from baseline to after 2.5 hours (T2) by 57%, 79% and 33% in group A, B and C respectively, with statistically significant difference in each group (p value < 0.001). Vitamin B1 continued to increase after six days (T6) in patients of groups A & B by 98% and 165% respectively, while dropped in patients of group C from 33% at T2 to 6% at T6, with p-value ≤ 0.001 between the three groups. Diabetic Neuropathic Symptom Score (DNS) decreased in mean value in all groups after 14 days of treatment by 64.4%, 53.7% and 48.6% in group A, B and C respectively, indicating improvement of peripheral neuropathy. Safety: There was no AE or SAE reported during the study. Conclusion: Oral Benfotiamine 300 mg is safe and more effective than intramuscular Thiamine HCl, in increasing vitamin B1 blood level in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy, which in turn relieves peripheral neuropathy. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NA Keywords: Benfotiamine, Bioavailability, Thiamine, Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Abbreviations : Adverse Event (AE), Advanced Glycation End products (AGE), Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Alanine Transaminase (ALT), Body Mass Index (BMI), Case Report Form (CRF), Diabetic Neuropathic Symptom score (DNSS), Diacylglycerol (DAG), Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitor (DPP-4 I), Good Clinical Practice (GCP), Informed Consent Form (ICF), Intent to Treat (ITT), Institutional Review Board (IRB), Ministry of Health (MOH), National Institute of Diabetes and endocrinology (NIDE), Nuclear Factor kappaB (NF-κB), Per Protocol (PP), Protein Kinase C (PKC), Research and health Development (RHD), Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Serotonin and Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors (SNRIs), Transient Ischemic Stroke (TIA)","PeriodicalId":73731,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endocrinology and diabetes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oral Benfotiamine 300 mg Versus Intramuscular Thiamine in Diabetic Patients with Peripheral Neuropathy\",\"authors\":\"M. E. Hefnawy, H. Ramadan, Dina Rabie, A. Effat\",\"doi\":\"10.15226/2374-6890/9/1/001156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: This is a prospective, pilot, open-label, interventional, comparative, randomized study, enrolled 60 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) to assess the effect of different doses of oral vitamin B containing Benfotiamine 300 mg versus intramuscular B vitamins containing watersoluble Thiamine HCl. Methods Patients ≥ 18 years with T2DM with Peripheral Neuropathy, divided into 3 groups; A & B (Benfotiamine 300 mg) and group C (Thiamine HCl), which were sub-divided to include patients with HbA1c less or more than 8 %. Patients were evaluated at baseline, after 2.5 hours, six days, and two weeks. Results Blood vitamin B1 increased from baseline to after 2.5 hours (T2) by 57%, 79% and 33% in group A, B and C respectively, with statistically significant difference in each group (p value < 0.001). Vitamin B1 continued to increase after six days (T6) in patients of groups A & B by 98% and 165% respectively, while dropped in patients of group C from 33% at T2 to 6% at T6, with p-value ≤ 0.001 between the three groups. Diabetic Neuropathic Symptom Score (DNS) decreased in mean value in all groups after 14 days of treatment by 64.4%, 53.7% and 48.6% in group A, B and C respectively, indicating improvement of peripheral neuropathy. Safety: There was no AE or SAE reported during the study. Conclusion: Oral Benfotiamine 300 mg is safe and more effective than intramuscular Thiamine HCl, in increasing vitamin B1 blood level in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy, which in turn relieves peripheral neuropathy. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NA Keywords: Benfotiamine, Bioavailability, Thiamine, Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Abbreviations : Adverse Event (AE), Advanced Glycation End products (AGE), Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Alanine Transaminase (ALT), Body Mass Index (BMI), Case Report Form (CRF), Diabetic Neuropathic Symptom score (DNSS), Diacylglycerol (DAG), Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitor (DPP-4 I), Good Clinical Practice (GCP), Informed Consent Form (ICF), Intent to Treat (ITT), Institutional Review Board (IRB), Ministry of Health (MOH), National Institute of Diabetes and endocrinology (NIDE), Nuclear Factor kappaB (NF-κB), Per Protocol (PP), Protein Kinase C (PKC), Research and health Development (RHD), Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Serotonin and Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors (SNRIs), Transient Ischemic Stroke (TIA)\",\"PeriodicalId\":73731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endocrinology and diabetes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endocrinology and diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15226/2374-6890/9/1/001156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endocrinology and diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15226/2374-6890/9/1/001156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:这是一项前瞻性、先导性、开放标签、介入性、比较性、随机研究,纳入了60名2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者,以评估不同剂量的含苯硫胺300mg的口服维生素B与含水溶性盐酸硫胺素的肌内维生素B的效果。方法将年龄≥18岁的2型糖尿病合并周围神经病变患者分为3组;A和B组(苯硫胺300mg)和C组(盐酸硫胺),将其细分为HbA1c小于或大于8%的患者。在基线、2.5小时、6天和两周后对患者进行评估。结果A组、B组和C组血液维生素B1从基线到2.5小时后(T2)分别增加57%、79%和33%,各组差异有统计学意义(p值<0.001),三组间p值≤0.001。治疗14天后,A组、B组和C组的糖尿病神经病变症状评分(DNS)平均值分别下降了64.4%、53.7%和48.6%,表明周围神经病变有所改善。安全性:研究期间未报告AE或SAE。结论:口服300 mg苯硫胺比肌内注射盐酸硫胺更安全、更有效地提高糖尿病周围神经病变患者的维生素B1血药水平,从而缓解周围神经病变。临床试验注册号:NA关键词:苯硫胺、生物利用度、硫胺素、糖尿病周围神经病变缩写:不良事件(AE)、晚期糖化终产物(AGE)、方差分析(ANOVA)、丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、体重指数(BMI)、病例报告表(CRF)、糖尿病神经病变症状评分(DNSS)、二酰甘油(DAG),二肽基肽酶4抑制剂(DPP-4 I)、良好临床实践(GCP)、知情同意书(ICF)、意向治疗(ITT)、机构审查委员会(IRB)、卫生部、国家糖尿病和内分泌学研究所(NIDE)、核因子κB(NF-κB)、符合方案(PP)、蛋白激酶C(PKC)、研究与健康发展(RHD)、严重不良事件(SAE),血清素和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs),短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oral Benfotiamine 300 mg Versus Intramuscular Thiamine in Diabetic Patients with Peripheral Neuropathy
Aim: This is a prospective, pilot, open-label, interventional, comparative, randomized study, enrolled 60 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) to assess the effect of different doses of oral vitamin B containing Benfotiamine 300 mg versus intramuscular B vitamins containing watersoluble Thiamine HCl. Methods Patients ≥ 18 years with T2DM with Peripheral Neuropathy, divided into 3 groups; A & B (Benfotiamine 300 mg) and group C (Thiamine HCl), which were sub-divided to include patients with HbA1c less or more than 8 %. Patients were evaluated at baseline, after 2.5 hours, six days, and two weeks. Results Blood vitamin B1 increased from baseline to after 2.5 hours (T2) by 57%, 79% and 33% in group A, B and C respectively, with statistically significant difference in each group (p value < 0.001). Vitamin B1 continued to increase after six days (T6) in patients of groups A & B by 98% and 165% respectively, while dropped in patients of group C from 33% at T2 to 6% at T6, with p-value ≤ 0.001 between the three groups. Diabetic Neuropathic Symptom Score (DNS) decreased in mean value in all groups after 14 days of treatment by 64.4%, 53.7% and 48.6% in group A, B and C respectively, indicating improvement of peripheral neuropathy. Safety: There was no AE or SAE reported during the study. Conclusion: Oral Benfotiamine 300 mg is safe and more effective than intramuscular Thiamine HCl, in increasing vitamin B1 blood level in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy, which in turn relieves peripheral neuropathy. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NA Keywords: Benfotiamine, Bioavailability, Thiamine, Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Abbreviations : Adverse Event (AE), Advanced Glycation End products (AGE), Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Alanine Transaminase (ALT), Body Mass Index (BMI), Case Report Form (CRF), Diabetic Neuropathic Symptom score (DNSS), Diacylglycerol (DAG), Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitor (DPP-4 I), Good Clinical Practice (GCP), Informed Consent Form (ICF), Intent to Treat (ITT), Institutional Review Board (IRB), Ministry of Health (MOH), National Institute of Diabetes and endocrinology (NIDE), Nuclear Factor kappaB (NF-κB), Per Protocol (PP), Protein Kinase C (PKC), Research and health Development (RHD), Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Serotonin and Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors (SNRIs), Transient Ischemic Stroke (TIA)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信