关于口译专业的常见误区分析

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Katarzyna Kruk‑Junger
{"title":"关于口译专业的常见误区分析","authors":"Katarzyna Kruk‑Junger","doi":"10.12797/moap.27.2021.54.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article is to present some of the problems related to the professionalisation of interpreting from the perspective of the public misconceptions about this occupation. An analysis of three press releases published online shows, that the terms “interpreting” and “translation” are used quite often to describe any form of communication occurring between two languages, rather than a profession, even if no third, mediating party is present. This may suggest low social consciousness regarding liaison interpreting and a need to consider the public image during the professionalisation process of this occupation.","PeriodicalId":36042,"journal":{"name":"Miedzy Oryginalem a Przekladem","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Some Common Misconceptions Regarding the Profession of Liaison Interpreting\",\"authors\":\"Katarzyna Kruk‑Junger\",\"doi\":\"10.12797/moap.27.2021.54.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the article is to present some of the problems related to the professionalisation of interpreting from the perspective of the public misconceptions about this occupation. An analysis of three press releases published online shows, that the terms “interpreting” and “translation” are used quite often to describe any form of communication occurring between two languages, rather than a profession, even if no third, mediating party is present. This may suggest low social consciousness regarding liaison interpreting and a need to consider the public image during the professionalisation process of this occupation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Miedzy Oryginalem a Przekladem\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Miedzy Oryginalem a Przekladem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12797/moap.27.2021.54.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Miedzy Oryginalem a Przekladem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12797/moap.27.2021.54.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是从公众对口译职业的误解的角度,提出与口译职业化相关的一些问题。对网上发布的三份新闻稿的分析表明,“口译”和“翻译”这两个术语经常被用来描述两种语言之间发生的任何形式的交流,而不是一种职业,即使没有第三方调解方在场。这可能表明,社会对联络口译的意识较低,在这一职业的专业化过程中需要考虑公众形象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Some Common Misconceptions Regarding the Profession of Liaison Interpreting
The aim of the article is to present some of the problems related to the professionalisation of interpreting from the perspective of the public misconceptions about this occupation. An analysis of three press releases published online shows, that the terms “interpreting” and “translation” are used quite often to describe any form of communication occurring between two languages, rather than a profession, even if no third, mediating party is present. This may suggest low social consciousness regarding liaison interpreting and a need to consider the public image during the professionalisation process of this occupation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Miedzy Oryginalem a Przekladem
Miedzy Oryginalem a Przekladem Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信