{"title":"国际法院和法庭裁决的合法性问题","authors":"T. Treves","doi":"10.5007/2177-7055.2017V38N75P19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In considering the use of force outside the parameters of the U.N. Charter, the expression “illegal, but legitimate” has been used, in particular in the Goldstone report.1 In that context, legitimacy as opposed to legality is used to indicate a judgement based on values different from those of conformity with the law. These values include moral principles such as the safeguarding of human life and dignity. “Legitimate” indicates a perception of acceptability in light of these values.","PeriodicalId":30170,"journal":{"name":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","volume":"38 1","pages":"19-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5007/2177-7055.2017V38N75P19","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aspects of Legitimacy of Decisions of International Courts and Tribunals\",\"authors\":\"T. Treves\",\"doi\":\"10.5007/2177-7055.2017V38N75P19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In considering the use of force outside the parameters of the U.N. Charter, the expression “illegal, but legitimate” has been used, in particular in the Goldstone report.1 In that context, legitimacy as opposed to legality is used to indicate a judgement based on values different from those of conformity with the law. These values include moral principles such as the safeguarding of human life and dignity. “Legitimate” indicates a perception of acceptability in light of these values.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"19-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5007/2177-7055.2017V38N75P19\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2017V38N75P19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2017V38N75P19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Aspects of Legitimacy of Decisions of International Courts and Tribunals
In considering the use of force outside the parameters of the U.N. Charter, the expression “illegal, but legitimate” has been used, in particular in the Goldstone report.1 In that context, legitimacy as opposed to legality is used to indicate a judgement based on values different from those of conformity with the law. These values include moral principles such as the safeguarding of human life and dignity. “Legitimate” indicates a perception of acceptability in light of these values.