学生如何回应助教的批判性反馈：导师和反馈特征对可信度、有效性、情感和自尊的影响

IF 0.7 Q3 COMMUNICATION

WESTERN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION Pub Date : 2022-11-14 DOI:10.1080/10570314.2022.2135386

Ioana A. Cionea, Britney N. Gilmore, Anthony T. Machette, P. Kavya

{"title":"学生如何回应助教的批判性反馈：导师和反馈特征对可信度、有效性、情感和自尊的影响","authors":"Ioana A. Cionea, Britney N. Gilmore, Anthony T. Machette, P. Kavya","doi":"10.1080/10570314.2022.2135386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study (N = 788) investigated experimentally how students respond to critical instructor feedback by manipulating teaching assistant (TA) cultural background and experience, and feedback wording and detail. Open-ended responses were also elicited to learn about students’ reactions to such feedback. Results indicated that instructor competence and trustworthiness differed based on TA background, experience, and feedback wording. Instructor goodwill differed based on feedback wording and detail. Finally, feedback wording lowered students’ self-efficacy and increased students’ negative affect when worded negatively vs. affirmatively. Open-ended data revealed students respond to critical feedback by implementing it, seeking further clarification but also reacting affectively, or figuring out alternatives.","PeriodicalId":46926,"journal":{"name":"WESTERN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Students Respond to Critical Feedback from Teaching Assistants: The Effect of Instructor and Feedback Characteristics on Perceptions of Credibility, Efficacy, Affect, and Self-Esteem\",\"authors\":\"Ioana A. Cionea, Britney N. Gilmore, Anthony T. Machette, P. Kavya\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10570314.2022.2135386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study (N = 788) investigated experimentally how students respond to critical instructor feedback by manipulating teaching assistant (TA) cultural background and experience, and feedback wording and detail. Open-ended responses were also elicited to learn about students’ reactions to such feedback. Results indicated that instructor competence and trustworthiness differed based on TA background, experience, and feedback wording. Instructor goodwill differed based on feedback wording and detail. Finally, feedback wording lowered students’ self-efficacy and increased students’ negative affect when worded negatively vs. affirmatively. Open-ended data revealed students respond to critical feedback by implementing it, seeking further clarification but also reacting affectively, or figuring out alternatives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WESTERN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WESTERN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2022.2135386\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WESTERN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2022.2135386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究（N=788）通过实验研究了学生如何通过操纵助教（TA）的文化背景和经验，以及反馈的措辞和细节来回应批判性教师的反馈。还引发了开放式回答，以了解学生对此类反馈的反应。结果表明，教师的能力和可信度因TA背景、经验和反馈措辞而异。讲师的好感度因反馈措辞和细节而异。最后，当消极措辞与肯定措辞相比时，反馈措辞降低了学生的自我效能感，增加了学生的负面影响。开放式数据显示，学生对批判性反馈的反应是实施反馈，寻求进一步澄清，但也会做出情感反应，或找出替代方案。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

How Students Respond to Critical Feedback from Teaching Assistants: The Effect of Instructor and Feedback Characteristics on Perceptions of Credibility, Efficacy, Affect, and Self-Esteem

This study (N = 788) investigated experimentally how students respond to critical instructor feedback by manipulating teaching assistant (TA) cultural background and experience, and feedback wording and detail. Open-ended responses were also elicited to learn about students’ reactions to such feedback. Results indicated that instructor competence and trustworthiness differed based on TA background, experience, and feedback wording. Instructor goodwill differed based on feedback wording and detail. Finally, feedback wording lowered students’ self-efficacy and increased students’ negative affect when worded negatively vs. affirmatively. Open-ended data revealed students respond to critical feedback by implementing it, seeking further clarification but also reacting affectively, or figuring out alternatives.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

WESTERN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION-

CiteScore

1.90

自引率

9.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Published quarterly since 1937, the Western Journal of Communication is one of two scholarly journals of the Western States Communication Association (WSCA). The journal is dedicated to the publication of original scholarship that enhances our understanding of human communication. Diverse theoretical and methodological perspectives are welcome. WJC"s longstanding commitment to multiple approaches, perspectives, and issues is reflected by its history of publishing research across rhetorical and media studies, interpersonal and intercultural communication, critical and cultural studies, language behavior, performance studies, small group and organizational communication, freedom of speech, and health and family communication.