{"title":"《累进税率与收入不平等之间的内在冲突:新冠肺炎限制的教训》讨论评论","authors":"J. R. Adams","doi":"10.2308/api-2023-011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this discussion of “The Inherent Conflict Between Progressive Tax Rates and Income Inequality: Lessons from COVID-19 Restrictions” by Nathan C. Goldman, Stephen J. Lusch, and Gil Sadka, I first provide context in which to better understand the article’s findings and contribution. I then discuss endogeneity and the generalizability of the article’s findings. I conclude with suggestions for future research.\n Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text.","PeriodicalId":38883,"journal":{"name":"Accounting and the Public Interest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discussant Comment on “The Inherent Conflict between Progressive Tax Rates and Income Inequality: Lessons from COVID-19 Restrictions”\",\"authors\":\"J. R. Adams\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/api-2023-011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In this discussion of “The Inherent Conflict Between Progressive Tax Rates and Income Inequality: Lessons from COVID-19 Restrictions” by Nathan C. Goldman, Stephen J. Lusch, and Gil Sadka, I first provide context in which to better understand the article’s findings and contribution. I then discuss endogeneity and the generalizability of the article’s findings. I conclude with suggestions for future research.\\n Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting and the Public Interest\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting and the Public Interest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/api-2023-011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting and the Public Interest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/api-2023-011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
Discussant Comment on “The Inherent Conflict between Progressive Tax Rates and Income Inequality: Lessons from COVID-19 Restrictions”
In this discussion of “The Inherent Conflict Between Progressive Tax Rates and Income Inequality: Lessons from COVID-19 Restrictions” by Nathan C. Goldman, Stephen J. Lusch, and Gil Sadka, I first provide context in which to better understand the article’s findings and contribution. I then discuss endogeneity and the generalizability of the article’s findings. I conclude with suggestions for future research.
Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text.