《马可福音》1:29-31中西蒙岳母的治愈:从对疾病的理解在治疗中的作用看意识形态批判

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
J. C. Madubuko
{"title":"《马可福音》1:29-31中西蒙岳母的治愈:从对疾病的理解在治疗中的作用看意识形态批判","authors":"J. C. Madubuko","doi":"10.1353/neo.2021.0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The healing of Simon‘s mother-in-law in Mark’s Gospel, while presenting us with the shortest of the miracle stories in the Gospels, contains all the necessary elements of its Gattung. For the critical 21st-century reader, given today’s medical understanding of the nature of the \"sickness\" in question—fever—as well as the issues of the healing process, the text may leave much to be desired. Through the prism of ideological criticism the text is re-read, and by means of a literature review a close look at Mark’s theology and its inherent Christology is undertaken. From the backdrop of the understanding of sickness in the first-century Greco-Roman world and the understanding of the Jesus event, the article argues that the age-old maxim lex credendi, lex vivendi is at work. The understanding held about a particular medical situation affects the way it is attended to. Arguing that such a thought pattern evidenced in African-Nigerian settings presents difficulties both to mature faith and the treatment of sicknesses, this article criticises the insistent holding onto this ancient worldview. It urges the taking of the steps to accessing the possibilities of medicine today.","PeriodicalId":42126,"journal":{"name":"Neotestamentica","volume":"55 1","pages":"389 - 407"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Healing of Simon’s Mother-in-Law in Mark 1:29–31: An Ideological-Critical Reading in the Light of the Role of the Understanding of Sickness in Its Cure\",\"authors\":\"J. C. Madubuko\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/neo.2021.0036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The healing of Simon‘s mother-in-law in Mark’s Gospel, while presenting us with the shortest of the miracle stories in the Gospels, contains all the necessary elements of its Gattung. For the critical 21st-century reader, given today’s medical understanding of the nature of the \\\"sickness\\\" in question—fever—as well as the issues of the healing process, the text may leave much to be desired. Through the prism of ideological criticism the text is re-read, and by means of a literature review a close look at Mark’s theology and its inherent Christology is undertaken. From the backdrop of the understanding of sickness in the first-century Greco-Roman world and the understanding of the Jesus event, the article argues that the age-old maxim lex credendi, lex vivendi is at work. The understanding held about a particular medical situation affects the way it is attended to. Arguing that such a thought pattern evidenced in African-Nigerian settings presents difficulties both to mature faith and the treatment of sicknesses, this article criticises the insistent holding onto this ancient worldview. It urges the taking of the steps to accessing the possibilities of medicine today.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neotestamentica\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"389 - 407\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neotestamentica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/neo.2021.0036\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neotestamentica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/neo.2021.0036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:《马可福音》中西蒙岳母的治愈,虽然为我们呈现了福音书中最简短的奇迹故事,但它包含了所有必要的要素。对于21世纪挑剔的读者来说,鉴于今天医学界对“疾病”——发烧——的性质以及治疗过程的问题的理解,文本可能还有很多不足之处。通过意识形态批评的棱镜,文本被重读,并通过文献综述的方式,对马克的神学及其固有的基督论进行了仔细的审视。本文以一世纪希腊罗马世界对疾病的理解和对耶稣事件的理解为背景,认为古老的格言“信用法,生存法”正在发挥作用。对特定医疗状况的理解会影响治疗方式。本文认为,在非裔尼日利亚人的环境中证明的这种思维模式给成熟的信仰和疾病治疗带来了困难,并批评了对这种古老世界观的坚持。它敦促采取步骤,以获取当今医学的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Healing of Simon’s Mother-in-Law in Mark 1:29–31: An Ideological-Critical Reading in the Light of the Role of the Understanding of Sickness in Its Cure
Abstract:The healing of Simon‘s mother-in-law in Mark’s Gospel, while presenting us with the shortest of the miracle stories in the Gospels, contains all the necessary elements of its Gattung. For the critical 21st-century reader, given today’s medical understanding of the nature of the "sickness" in question—fever—as well as the issues of the healing process, the text may leave much to be desired. Through the prism of ideological criticism the text is re-read, and by means of a literature review a close look at Mark’s theology and its inherent Christology is undertaken. From the backdrop of the understanding of sickness in the first-century Greco-Roman world and the understanding of the Jesus event, the article argues that the age-old maxim lex credendi, lex vivendi is at work. The understanding held about a particular medical situation affects the way it is attended to. Arguing that such a thought pattern evidenced in African-Nigerian settings presents difficulties both to mature faith and the treatment of sicknesses, this article criticises the insistent holding onto this ancient worldview. It urges the taking of the steps to accessing the possibilities of medicine today.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neotestamentica
Neotestamentica RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信