DFID的新城市话语：一种批判

IF 1.6 Q3 URBAN STUDIES

TOWN PLANNING REVIEW Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.3828/tpr.2020.26

R. McGill

{"title":"DFID的新城市话语：一种批判","authors":"R. McGill","doi":"10.3828/tpr.2020.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"DFID is a self-confessed late entrant to the urban discourse. Two major recent proposals give this assertion credence. First is the collective Cities and Infrastructure for Growth (CIG) programme, to strengthen the management of urban and energy sectors and boost investment in infrastructure. Second is the African Cities Research Programme, to produce new knowledge and evidence on African cities as systems. In turn, from both practical and research standpoints, they seek to reduce poverty and enhance national prosperity through the known advantages of urbanisation, while impacting on its negative dimensions. This critique seeks to test the assumptions underscoring both proposals.","PeriodicalId":47547,"journal":{"name":"TOWN PLANNING REVIEW","volume":"91 1","pages":"461-474"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DFID’s new urban discourse: a critique\",\"authors\":\"R. McGill\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/tpr.2020.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"DFID is a self-confessed late entrant to the urban discourse. Two major recent proposals give this assertion credence. First is the collective Cities and Infrastructure for Growth (CIG) programme, to strengthen the management of urban and energy sectors and boost investment in infrastructure. Second is the African Cities Research Programme, to produce new knowledge and evidence on African cities as systems. In turn, from both practical and research standpoints, they seek to reduce poverty and enhance national prosperity through the known advantages of urbanisation, while impacting on its negative dimensions. This critique seeks to test the assumptions underscoring both proposals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TOWN PLANNING REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"461-474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TOWN PLANNING REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2020.26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TOWN PLANNING REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2020.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

DFID自认为是城市话语的后期参与者。最近的两项主要提案证实了这一说法。首先是集体城市和基础设施促进增长（CIG）计划，以加强城市和能源部门的管理，并促进基础设施投资。第二个是非洲城市研究计划，以产生关于非洲城市作为系统的新知识和证据。反过来，从实践和研究的角度来看，他们试图通过城市化的已知优势来减少贫困和促进国家繁荣，同时影响其负面影响。这篇评论试图检验强调这两项提议的假设。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

DFID’s new urban discourse: a critique

DFID is a self-confessed late entrant to the urban discourse. Two major recent proposals give this assertion credence. First is the collective Cities and Infrastructure for Growth (CIG) programme, to strengthen the management of urban and energy sectors and boost investment in infrastructure. Second is the African Cities Research Programme, to produce new knowledge and evidence on African cities as systems. In turn, from both practical and research standpoints, they seek to reduce poverty and enhance national prosperity through the known advantages of urbanisation, while impacting on its negative dimensions. This critique seeks to test the assumptions underscoring both proposals.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

TOWN PLANNING REVIEW URBAN STUDIES-

CiteScore

3.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Town Planning Review has been one of the world"s leading journals of urban and regional planning since its foundation in 1910. With an extensive international readership, TPR is a well established urban and regional planning journal, providing a principal forum for communication between researchers and students, policy analysts and practitioners. To mark TPR’s centenary in 2010, it is proposed to publish a series of ‘Centenary Papers’ -- review papers that record and reflect on the state of the art in a range of topics in the general field of town and regional planning.