白俄罗斯身份叙事的重建：白俄罗斯语言

Q4 Social Sciences

Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.2478/lasr-2019-0011

Juljan Jachovič

{"title":"白俄罗斯身份叙事的重建：白俄罗斯语言","authors":"Juljan Jachovič","doi":"10.2478/lasr-2019-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Since the beginning of Alexander Lukashenko’s presidency, the Belarusian authorities’ attitude towards the Belarusian language was seen as rather negative. However, amid turbulent events in the region, the official narratives on Belarusian statehood changed in 2014 with the rise of the so-called soft-Belarusization phenomenon. A new political discourse – positive towards formerly distinct opposition symbols, particularly the Belarusian language, was adopted by a number of different-rank government officials. Furthermore, it has been accompanied by a number of practical changes in government and civil society operations within an identity-building domain. This paper presents the results of a critical discourse analysis of the newly formed social representation reshaping the role of the Belarusian language, and the overall cognition of Belarusianness.","PeriodicalId":37780,"journal":{"name":"Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"249 - 270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Reconstruction of Belarusian Identity Narratives: The Belarusian Language\",\"authors\":\"Juljan Jachovič\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/lasr-2019-0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Since the beginning of Alexander Lukashenko’s presidency, the Belarusian authorities’ attitude towards the Belarusian language was seen as rather negative. However, amid turbulent events in the region, the official narratives on Belarusian statehood changed in 2014 with the rise of the so-called soft-Belarusization phenomenon. A new political discourse – positive towards formerly distinct opposition symbols, particularly the Belarusian language, was adopted by a number of different-rank government officials. Furthermore, it has been accompanied by a number of practical changes in government and civil society operations within an identity-building domain. This paper presents the results of a critical discourse analysis of the newly formed social representation reshaping the role of the Belarusian language, and the overall cognition of Belarusianness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"249 - 270\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/lasr-2019-0011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/lasr-2019-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要自亚历山大·卢卡申科担任总统以来，白俄罗斯当局对白俄罗斯语言的态度被视为相当消极。然而，在该地区发生的动荡事件中，2014年，随着所谓的软白俄罗斯化现象的兴起，官方对白俄罗斯国家地位的说法发生了变化。一些不同级别的政府官员采用了一种新的政治话语——积极对待以前不同的反对派象征，特别是白俄罗斯语。此外，在身份建设领域，政府和民间社会的运作也发生了一些实际变化。本文对新形成的重塑白俄罗斯语言角色的社会表征进行了批判性话语分析，并对白俄罗斯性进行了全面认知。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Reconstruction of Belarusian Identity Narratives: The Belarusian Language

Abstract Since the beginning of Alexander Lukashenko’s presidency, the Belarusian authorities’ attitude towards the Belarusian language was seen as rather negative. However, amid turbulent events in the region, the official narratives on Belarusian statehood changed in 2014 with the rise of the so-called soft-Belarusization phenomenon. A new political discourse – positive towards formerly distinct opposition symbols, particularly the Belarusian language, was adopted by a number of different-rank government officials. Furthermore, it has been accompanied by a number of practical changes in government and civil society operations within an identity-building domain. This paper presents the results of a critical discourse analysis of the newly formed social representation reshaping the role of the Belarusian language, and the overall cognition of Belarusianness.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

36 weeks

期刊介绍： Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review is a bilingual (Lithuanian and English), peer reviewed scholarly magazine that is published once per year by the Strategic Research Center of the Military Academy of Lithuania in cooperation with Vilnius University (Institute of International Relations and Political Science) and Vytautas Magnus University in Kaunas (Political Science and Diplomacy Department). The journal focuses on the global, regional and national security problematique which directly or indirectly influence security and defense issues of Lithuania, the Baltic states and region around. The Review aims to sustain high profile scientific publications delivering rigorous analytical insights into security and defence problematique ofn the region and to be ranked as a regular and high-quality academic periodical. The Review reaches out for academic community and political practitioners and offer ample opportunities for scholarly visibility and potential impact.