地理与女权主义科学技术研究交叉点上的Aporias:黑人研究的批判性参与

IF 6.3 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Alex Liebman, L. Katz, Andrea Marston
{"title":"地理与女权主义科学技术研究交叉点上的Aporias:黑人研究的批判性参与","authors":"Alex Liebman, L. Katz, Andrea Marston","doi":"10.1177/03091325221149721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this review, we read the interdisciplinary traffic across critical human geography and feminist science and technology studies (FSTS) in light of the insights and destabilizing aporias—in other words, irresolvable contradictions or logical disjunctions—emerging from Black radical and feminist study. We highlight three thematic areas that have received sustained attention and debate and that resonate across the three fields: objectivity and subjectivity, agency, and life and its excesses. Inspired by the methodological provocations of Katherine McKittrick’s Dear Science and the political demands of multiple intellectual currents within Black studies, we venture a modest upending of the form of the review itself. Rather than seek to delineate and codify contributions to a scholarly debate, we point to troubled assumptions and potential openings for those working at the intersection of critical human geography, FSTS, and Black studies.","PeriodicalId":48403,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Human Geography","volume":"47 1","pages":"238 - 258"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aporias at the intersection of geography and feminist science and technology studies: Critical engagements with Black studies\",\"authors\":\"Alex Liebman, L. Katz, Andrea Marston\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03091325221149721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this review, we read the interdisciplinary traffic across critical human geography and feminist science and technology studies (FSTS) in light of the insights and destabilizing aporias—in other words, irresolvable contradictions or logical disjunctions—emerging from Black radical and feminist study. We highlight three thematic areas that have received sustained attention and debate and that resonate across the three fields: objectivity and subjectivity, agency, and life and its excesses. Inspired by the methodological provocations of Katherine McKittrick’s Dear Science and the political demands of multiple intellectual currents within Black studies, we venture a modest upending of the form of the review itself. Rather than seek to delineate and codify contributions to a scholarly debate, we point to troubled assumptions and potential openings for those working at the intersection of critical human geography, FSTS, and Black studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Human Geography\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"238 - 258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Human Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325221149721\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Human Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325221149721","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在这篇综述中,我们阅读了批判性人文地理学和女权主义科学技术研究(FSTS)的跨学科交流,以了解黑人激进和女权主义研究中出现的见解和不稳定的Aparias——换句话说,无法解决的矛盾或逻辑脱节。我们强调了三个主题领域,它们受到了持续的关注和辩论,并在三个领域产生了共鸣:客观性和主观性、能动性以及生活及其过度性。受凯瑟琳·麦基特里克(Katherine McKittrick)的《亲爱的科学》(Dear Science)的方法论挑衅和黑人研究中多种知识潮流的政治要求的启发,我们大胆地对评论本身的形式进行了适度的颠覆。我们没有试图描述和编纂对学术辩论的贡献,而是指出了那些在批判性人文地理学、FSTS和黑人研究交叉点工作的人所面临的困难假设和潜在的机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aporias at the intersection of geography and feminist science and technology studies: Critical engagements with Black studies
In this review, we read the interdisciplinary traffic across critical human geography and feminist science and technology studies (FSTS) in light of the insights and destabilizing aporias—in other words, irresolvable contradictions or logical disjunctions—emerging from Black radical and feminist study. We highlight three thematic areas that have received sustained attention and debate and that resonate across the three fields: objectivity and subjectivity, agency, and life and its excesses. Inspired by the methodological provocations of Katherine McKittrick’s Dear Science and the political demands of multiple intellectual currents within Black studies, we venture a modest upending of the form of the review itself. Rather than seek to delineate and codify contributions to a scholarly debate, we point to troubled assumptions and potential openings for those working at the intersection of critical human geography, FSTS, and Black studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.40
自引率
7.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Progress in Human Geography is the peer-review journal of choice for those wanting to know about the state of the art in all areas of research in the field of human geography - philosophical, theoretical, thematic, methodological or empirical. Concerned primarily with critical reviews of current research, PiHG enables a space for debate about questions, concepts and findings of formative influence in human geography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信