物质性的定性因素

D. Raziūnienė, Gintarė Verbickaitė
{"title":"物质性的定性因素","authors":"D. Raziūnienė, Gintarė Verbickaitė","doi":"10.15388/BATP.2019.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the audit evidence gathering process, the auditor uses a set of assumptions about audit risk factors and determines the level of material error and misstatement. In practice, questions arise as to how the auditor should avoid making mistakes in shaping its approach to the information that is relevant to users of financial statements. The aim of the study is to reveal the basic regulation of qualitative materiality factors. Tasks of the research are to analyze the regulatory provisions of international auditing standards, to identify issues regarding the assessment of qualitative factors of materiality and its influence on decision making process of the auditors. Methods of literature analysis, systematization, abstracting and grouping analysis are used in the article. The analysis of scientific and professional literature has shown that qualitative parameters of significance are not precisely defined in the regulatory provisions, therefore, the auditors are left with a wide range of qualitative materiality factors. These factors can fundamentally change the auditor's decision-making process choosing relevant audit procedures. The auditor must evaluate the qualitative data and information comprehensively and be able to identify qualitative factors of materiality. \nJEL klasifikacija: M42","PeriodicalId":52857,"journal":{"name":"Buhalterines Apskaitos Teorija ir Praktika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qualitative Factors of the Materiality\",\"authors\":\"D. Raziūnienė, Gintarė Verbickaitė\",\"doi\":\"10.15388/BATP.2019.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the audit evidence gathering process, the auditor uses a set of assumptions about audit risk factors and determines the level of material error and misstatement. In practice, questions arise as to how the auditor should avoid making mistakes in shaping its approach to the information that is relevant to users of financial statements. The aim of the study is to reveal the basic regulation of qualitative materiality factors. Tasks of the research are to analyze the regulatory provisions of international auditing standards, to identify issues regarding the assessment of qualitative factors of materiality and its influence on decision making process of the auditors. Methods of literature analysis, systematization, abstracting and grouping analysis are used in the article. The analysis of scientific and professional literature has shown that qualitative parameters of significance are not precisely defined in the regulatory provisions, therefore, the auditors are left with a wide range of qualitative materiality factors. These factors can fundamentally change the auditor's decision-making process choosing relevant audit procedures. The auditor must evaluate the qualitative data and information comprehensively and be able to identify qualitative factors of materiality. \\nJEL klasifikacija: M42\",\"PeriodicalId\":52857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Buhalterines Apskaitos Teorija ir Praktika\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Buhalterines Apskaitos Teorija ir Praktika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15388/BATP.2019.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buhalterines Apskaitos Teorija ir Praktika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/BATP.2019.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在审计证据收集过程中,审计师使用一组关于审计风险因素的假设,并确定重大错误和错报的程度。在实践中,审计师应如何避免在制定与财务报表用户相关的信息处理方法时出错,这是一个问题。本研究的目的是揭示定性物质性因素的基本规律。本研究的任务是分析国际审计准则的监管规定,确定有关实质性定性因素评估及其对审计师决策过程的影响的问题。文章采用文献分析、系统化、抽象化、分组分析等方法。对科学和专业文献的分析表明,监管条款中没有准确定义具有重要意义的定性参数,因此,审计师面临着广泛的定性实质性因素。这些因素可以从根本上改变审计师选择相关审计程序的决策过程。审计师必须全面评估定性数据和信息,并能够识别实质性的定性因素。JEL klasifikacija:M42
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Qualitative Factors of the Materiality
In the audit evidence gathering process, the auditor uses a set of assumptions about audit risk factors and determines the level of material error and misstatement. In practice, questions arise as to how the auditor should avoid making mistakes in shaping its approach to the information that is relevant to users of financial statements. The aim of the study is to reveal the basic regulation of qualitative materiality factors. Tasks of the research are to analyze the regulatory provisions of international auditing standards, to identify issues regarding the assessment of qualitative factors of materiality and its influence on decision making process of the auditors. Methods of literature analysis, systematization, abstracting and grouping analysis are used in the article. The analysis of scientific and professional literature has shown that qualitative parameters of significance are not precisely defined in the regulatory provisions, therefore, the auditors are left with a wide range of qualitative materiality factors. These factors can fundamentally change the auditor's decision-making process choosing relevant audit procedures. The auditor must evaluate the qualitative data and information comprehensively and be able to identify qualitative factors of materiality. JEL klasifikacija: M42
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信