技术上的维护、功能和故障

IF 0.7 4区 管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Alexandra Karakas
{"title":"技术上的维护、功能和故障","authors":"Alexandra Karakas","doi":"10.22503/INFTARS.XIX.2019.4.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper takes a new look at the concept of maintenance through the notion of function and malfunction. I propose that different maintenance strategies have contrasting philosophical approaches about the nature of technology. I claim that the main difference between reactive and predictive maintenance is that the latter holds an underlying deterministic approach. On the one hand, the assumption behind predictive maintenance is that we can predict how technology works and even progresses, and because of this, we can predict when will malfunction appear. On the other hand, reactive maintenance is based on unpredictability, and it is led by the appearance of failure. Thus, the central notion in both strategies is the concept of malfunction.","PeriodicalId":41114,"journal":{"name":"Informacios Tarsadalom","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maintenance, function, and malfunction in technology\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Karakas\",\"doi\":\"10.22503/INFTARS.XIX.2019.4.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper takes a new look at the concept of maintenance through the notion of function and malfunction. I propose that different maintenance strategies have contrasting philosophical approaches about the nature of technology. I claim that the main difference between reactive and predictive maintenance is that the latter holds an underlying deterministic approach. On the one hand, the assumption behind predictive maintenance is that we can predict how technology works and even progresses, and because of this, we can predict when will malfunction appear. On the other hand, reactive maintenance is based on unpredictability, and it is led by the appearance of failure. Thus, the central notion in both strategies is the concept of malfunction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Informacios Tarsadalom\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Informacios Tarsadalom\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22503/INFTARS.XIX.2019.4.3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informacios Tarsadalom","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22503/INFTARS.XIX.2019.4.3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过功能和故障的概念来重新审视维护的概念。我提出,不同的维护策略对技术的本质有着不同的哲学方法。我声称,反应性维护和预测性维护之间的主要区别在于后者具有潜在的确定性方法。一方面,预测性维护背后的假设是,我们可以预测技术是如何工作甚至发展的,正因为如此,我们才能预测故障何时出现。另一方面,反应性维护是基于不可预测性的,它是由故障的出现引起的。因此,这两种策略的核心概念都是故障的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Maintenance, function, and malfunction in technology
This paper takes a new look at the concept of maintenance through the notion of function and malfunction. I propose that different maintenance strategies have contrasting philosophical approaches about the nature of technology. I claim that the main difference between reactive and predictive maintenance is that the latter holds an underlying deterministic approach. On the one hand, the assumption behind predictive maintenance is that we can predict how technology works and even progresses, and because of this, we can predict when will malfunction appear. On the other hand, reactive maintenance is based on unpredictability, and it is led by the appearance of failure. Thus, the central notion in both strategies is the concept of malfunction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Informacios Tarsadalom
Informacios Tarsadalom INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信