比利时的地区间接触和投票行为：我们能从2019年的选举中学到什么？

IF 1.7 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE

Regional and Federal Studies Pub Date : 2021-05-27 DOI:10.1080/13597566.2021.1919096

P. Thijssen, Min Reuchamps, Lieven De Winter, Jérémy Dodeigne, Dave Sinardet

{"title":"比利时的地区间接触和投票行为：我们能从2019年的选举中学到什么？","authors":"P. Thijssen, Min Reuchamps, Lieven De Winter, Jérémy Dodeigne, Dave Sinardet","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2021.1919096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The 2019 elections in Belgium yielded contrasted results between the two main regions of the country, Flanders and Wallonia. It is often posited that at the core of this regional difference is the intermingled question of identity and state reform preferences. In this context, this article asks the following question: does the presence or absence of inter-regional contacts can explain voting behaviour? To answer this question, we use structural equation modelling in order to compare 2019 voting behaviour in Flanders and in Wallonia. We rely on the 2019 RepResent cross-sectional post-electoral survey that offers a representative sample of the population in both regions, including indicators of their inter-regional contacts and vote choice.","PeriodicalId":46657,"journal":{"name":"Regional and Federal Studies","volume":"31 1","pages":"359 - 380"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13597566.2021.1919096","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inter-regional contacts and voting behaviour in Belgium: What can we learn from the 2019 elections?\",\"authors\":\"P. Thijssen, Min Reuchamps, Lieven De Winter, Jérémy Dodeigne, Dave Sinardet\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13597566.2021.1919096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The 2019 elections in Belgium yielded contrasted results between the two main regions of the country, Flanders and Wallonia. It is often posited that at the core of this regional difference is the intermingled question of identity and state reform preferences. In this context, this article asks the following question: does the presence or absence of inter-regional contacts can explain voting behaviour? To answer this question, we use structural equation modelling in order to compare 2019 voting behaviour in Flanders and in Wallonia. We rely on the 2019 RepResent cross-sectional post-electoral survey that offers a representative sample of the population in both regions, including indicators of their inter-regional contacts and vote choice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional and Federal Studies\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"359 - 380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13597566.2021.1919096\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional and Federal Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2021.1919096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional and Federal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2021.1919096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要2019年比利时的选举结果与该国两个主要地区佛兰德斯和瓦隆尼亚的选举结果形成对比。人们经常认为，这种地区差异的核心是身份认同和国家改革偏好的混合问题。在这种情况下，本文提出了以下问题：区域间接触的存在或不存在是否可以解释投票行为？为了回答这个问题，我们使用结构方程模型来比较2019年佛兰德斯和瓦隆尼亚的投票行为。我们依赖2019年RepResent选举后横断面调查，该调查提供了两个地区人口的代表性样本，包括他们的地区间联系和选票选择指标。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Inter-regional contacts and voting behaviour in Belgium: What can we learn from the 2019 elections?

ABSTRACT The 2019 elections in Belgium yielded contrasted results between the two main regions of the country, Flanders and Wallonia. It is often posited that at the core of this regional difference is the intermingled question of identity and state reform preferences. In this context, this article asks the following question: does the presence or absence of inter-regional contacts can explain voting behaviour? To answer this question, we use structural equation modelling in order to compare 2019 voting behaviour in Flanders and in Wallonia. We rely on the 2019 RepResent cross-sectional post-electoral survey that offers a representative sample of the population in both regions, including indicators of their inter-regional contacts and vote choice.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Regional and Federal Studies POLITICAL SCIENCE-

CiteScore

3.80

自引率

21.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： The upsurge of academic and political interest in regional and federal questions since the 1980s has been stimulated by the salience of regions in EU policy-making and the Structural Funds but also by regionalization and federalization processes in many Western states. The most striking example is the devolution occurring in the UK, but the process is at work all over Europe and in other parts of the world. These developments have led to many important research programmes and projects. Regional and Federal Studies is a refereed social science journal which provides an academic forum for the publication of international research on these issues. It is essential reading for both academics and practitioners in politics, administration and the business world.