治疗性胸导管引流:东欧经验和未来潜力的系统回顾。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Lymphology Pub Date : 2022-11-22 DOI:10.2458/lymph.5402
P.S. Russell, S. Nachkebia, Victor E. Maldonado-Zimbron, S. Chuklin, G. Gimel'farb, J. Hong, N.D. Martin, M. Itkin, Arj Phillips, J. Windsor
{"title":"治疗性胸导管引流:东欧经验和未来潜力的系统回顾。","authors":"P.S. Russell, S. Nachkebia, Victor E. Maldonado-Zimbron, S. Chuklin, G. Gimel'farb, J. Hong, N.D. Martin, M. Itkin, Arj Phillips, J. Windsor","doi":"10.2458/lymph.5402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thoracic duct drainage (TDD) is gaining renewed interest, largely due to accumulation of evidence supporting the gut-lymph model, where toxic mesenteric lymph from the intestine contributes to development of multi-organ failure in acute and critical illness (ACI). Advances in minimally invasive TDD have added to this growing interest. The English TDD literature has been previously reviewed, but the more extensive Eastern European literature has not been available to English readers. Therefore, we undertook a systematic search of Eastern European human TDD studies using Scopus and PubMed databases and Russian language websites. Indications for TDD, clinical outcomes, and complications were reviewed. 113 studies, published between 1965 and 2015, were reviewed. The most common indications for TDD were hepatic failure, acute pancreatitis, and peritonitis. It was often used late and when other treatment options had been exhausted. Human TDD appeared safe and probably effective, especially when combined with lymphosorption. The benefit appeared to correlate with the volume of lymph drained. A randomized controlled trial (and some case-control studies) showed reduced mortality in patients with ACI with TDD. Other benefits included rapid normalization of blood parameters and decreased organ edema. This review provides further support for the gut-lymph model and justification for high quality randomized controlled trials of TDD in ACI. It also highlights other potential indications for TDD, such as bridging patients with liver failure to surgery or transplant.","PeriodicalId":51122,"journal":{"name":"Lymphology","volume":"55 3 1","pages":"86-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic thoracic duct drainage: A systematic review of the Eastern European experience and future potential.\",\"authors\":\"P.S. Russell, S. Nachkebia, Victor E. Maldonado-Zimbron, S. Chuklin, G. Gimel'farb, J. Hong, N.D. Martin, M. Itkin, Arj Phillips, J. Windsor\",\"doi\":\"10.2458/lymph.5402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Thoracic duct drainage (TDD) is gaining renewed interest, largely due to accumulation of evidence supporting the gut-lymph model, where toxic mesenteric lymph from the intestine contributes to development of multi-organ failure in acute and critical illness (ACI). Advances in minimally invasive TDD have added to this growing interest. The English TDD literature has been previously reviewed, but the more extensive Eastern European literature has not been available to English readers. Therefore, we undertook a systematic search of Eastern European human TDD studies using Scopus and PubMed databases and Russian language websites. Indications for TDD, clinical outcomes, and complications were reviewed. 113 studies, published between 1965 and 2015, were reviewed. The most common indications for TDD were hepatic failure, acute pancreatitis, and peritonitis. It was often used late and when other treatment options had been exhausted. Human TDD appeared safe and probably effective, especially when combined with lymphosorption. The benefit appeared to correlate with the volume of lymph drained. A randomized controlled trial (and some case-control studies) showed reduced mortality in patients with ACI with TDD. Other benefits included rapid normalization of blood parameters and decreased organ edema. This review provides further support for the gut-lymph model and justification for high quality randomized controlled trials of TDD in ACI. It also highlights other potential indications for TDD, such as bridging patients with liver failure to surgery or transplant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lymphology\",\"volume\":\"55 3 1\",\"pages\":\"86-109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lymphology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2458/lymph.5402\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lymphology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2458/lymph.5402","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胸导管引流术(TDD)正重新引起人们的兴趣,这主要是由于支持肠淋巴模型的证据的积累,在这种模型中,来自肠道的有毒肠系膜淋巴会导致急性和危重症(ACI)中多器官衰竭的发展。微创TDD的进展增加了这种日益增长的兴趣。英语TDD文献先前已被综述,但更广泛的东欧文献尚未提供给英语读者。因此,我们使用Scopus和PubMed数据库以及俄语网站对东欧人类TDD研究进行了系统搜索。对TDD的适应症、临床结果和并发症进行了综述。回顾了1965年至2015年间发表的113项研究。TDD最常见的适应症是肝衰竭、急性胰腺炎和腹膜炎。它经常使用得很晚,而且在其他治疗选择已经用尽的时候。人类TDD看起来是安全的,可能是有效的,尤其是当与淋巴吸附结合时。这种益处似乎与排出的淋巴量有关。一项随机对照试验(以及一些病例对照研究)显示,ACI伴TDD患者的死亡率降低。其他好处包括血液参数快速正常化和减少器官水肿。这篇综述为肠淋巴模型提供了进一步的支持,并为TDD在ACI中的高质量随机对照试验提供了理由。它还强调了TDD的其他潜在适应症,例如将肝衰竭患者连接到手术或移植。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Therapeutic thoracic duct drainage: A systematic review of the Eastern European experience and future potential.
Thoracic duct drainage (TDD) is gaining renewed interest, largely due to accumulation of evidence supporting the gut-lymph model, where toxic mesenteric lymph from the intestine contributes to development of multi-organ failure in acute and critical illness (ACI). Advances in minimally invasive TDD have added to this growing interest. The English TDD literature has been previously reviewed, but the more extensive Eastern European literature has not been available to English readers. Therefore, we undertook a systematic search of Eastern European human TDD studies using Scopus and PubMed databases and Russian language websites. Indications for TDD, clinical outcomes, and complications were reviewed. 113 studies, published between 1965 and 2015, were reviewed. The most common indications for TDD were hepatic failure, acute pancreatitis, and peritonitis. It was often used late and when other treatment options had been exhausted. Human TDD appeared safe and probably effective, especially when combined with lymphosorption. The benefit appeared to correlate with the volume of lymph drained. A randomized controlled trial (and some case-control studies) showed reduced mortality in patients with ACI with TDD. Other benefits included rapid normalization of blood parameters and decreased organ edema. This review provides further support for the gut-lymph model and justification for high quality randomized controlled trials of TDD in ACI. It also highlights other potential indications for TDD, such as bridging patients with liver failure to surgery or transplant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lymphology
Lymphology 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal contains original articles, special features (see below), and information regarding the International Society of Lymphology. It seeks original papers dealing with clinical and basic studies of the lymphatic system and its disorders including related fields. Articles are accepted for external review and publication on the condition that they are contributed to Lymphology only and that no substantial part has been or will be published elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信