惊弓之鸟:捕捉和实验干扰对欧洲野兔生存和运动行为的影响

IF 1.7 3区 生物学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Wildlife Biology Pub Date : 2021-07-27 DOI:10.2981/wlb.00840
M. Mayer, Lars Haugaard, P. Sunde
{"title":"惊弓之鸟:捕捉和实验干扰对欧洲野兔生存和运动行为的影响","authors":"M. Mayer, Lars Haugaard, P. Sunde","doi":"10.2981/wlb.00840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Capture and handling of wildlife is an important component of wildlife studies, and hunting can be a central tool for wildlife management. However, human-caused disturbance of animals can cause various negative effects on individuals. Thus, an increased understanding of different disturbances on animals will allow improved mitigation of human stressors for wildlife, and provides the basis for data-censoring when using information obtained from captured individuals. Here, we investigated the effects of capture and handling, as well as experimental disturbance, on the movement behavior of GPS-collared European hares Lepus europaeus. Of 28 hares captured in box traps, three died during handling to fit GPS collars, likely due to acute stress. Apart from an 11% decrease in activity in both sexes the first four days after capture compared to later, capture events had no significant effects on subsequent movement behavior. Hares that were disturbed experimentally, i.e. flushed with or without a shotgun shot fired, moved on average (± SD) 422 ± 206 m directly subsequent to the disturbance, leading to a spatial displacement of their short-term home range and an increased daily home range size on the disturbance day. Home range sizes returned to their before disturbance size on the following days, but hares remained further from field edges and spent more time in short vegetation in the days after simulated hunting, though this effect was comparatively small. Overall, our findings indicate that hares only marginally changed their movement behavior in response to short-term disturbances. Therefore, capture and hunting disturbance should not have severe negative effects on the movement behavior of individuals, but future studies should aim to reduce acute capture-related stress to avoid mortalities. We recommend that researchers should censor the first four days after capture from their analyses to avoid using potentially biased data.","PeriodicalId":54405,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Biology","volume":"2021 1","pages":"wlb.00840"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scared as a hare: effects of capture and experimental disturbance on survival and movement behavior of European hares\",\"authors\":\"M. Mayer, Lars Haugaard, P. Sunde\",\"doi\":\"10.2981/wlb.00840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Capture and handling of wildlife is an important component of wildlife studies, and hunting can be a central tool for wildlife management. However, human-caused disturbance of animals can cause various negative effects on individuals. Thus, an increased understanding of different disturbances on animals will allow improved mitigation of human stressors for wildlife, and provides the basis for data-censoring when using information obtained from captured individuals. Here, we investigated the effects of capture and handling, as well as experimental disturbance, on the movement behavior of GPS-collared European hares Lepus europaeus. Of 28 hares captured in box traps, three died during handling to fit GPS collars, likely due to acute stress. Apart from an 11% decrease in activity in both sexes the first four days after capture compared to later, capture events had no significant effects on subsequent movement behavior. Hares that were disturbed experimentally, i.e. flushed with or without a shotgun shot fired, moved on average (± SD) 422 ± 206 m directly subsequent to the disturbance, leading to a spatial displacement of their short-term home range and an increased daily home range size on the disturbance day. Home range sizes returned to their before disturbance size on the following days, but hares remained further from field edges and spent more time in short vegetation in the days after simulated hunting, though this effect was comparatively small. Overall, our findings indicate that hares only marginally changed their movement behavior in response to short-term disturbances. Therefore, capture and hunting disturbance should not have severe negative effects on the movement behavior of individuals, but future studies should aim to reduce acute capture-related stress to avoid mortalities. We recommend that researchers should censor the first four days after capture from their analyses to avoid using potentially biased data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wildlife Biology\",\"volume\":\"2021 1\",\"pages\":\"wlb.00840\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wildlife Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00840\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00840","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

捕获和处理野生动物是野生动物研究的重要组成部分,狩猎可以成为野生动物管理的中心工具。然而,人类对动物的干扰会对个体造成各种负面影响。因此,对动物受到的不同干扰的了解将有助于更好地缓解人类对野生动物的压力,并为使用从捕获个体获得的信息进行数据审查提供基础。在这里,我们研究了捕获和处理以及实验干扰对带GPS项圈的欧洲野兔Lepus europaeus运动行为的影响。在用箱式陷阱捕获的28只野兔中,有3只在搬运过程中死亡,可能是由于严重的压力。除了捕获后前四天两性的活动量比捕获后减少11%外,捕获事件对随后的运动行为没有显著影响。受到实验干扰的Hares,即在发射或不发射猎枪的情况下冲洗,在干扰后直接移动平均(±SD)422±206米,导致其短期主场范围发生空间位移,并在干扰日增加了每日主场范围大小。在接下来的几天里,狩猎场的大小恢复到了扰动前的大小,但在模拟狩猎后的几天内,野兔离田地边缘更远,在短植被中呆的时间更长,尽管这种影响相对较小。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,野兔对短期扰动的反应只是轻微地改变了它们的运动行为。因此,捕捉和狩猎干扰不应对个体的运动行为产生严重的负面影响,但未来的研究应旨在减少与捕捉相关的急性压力,以避免死亡。我们建议研究人员在分析捕获后的前四天进行审查,以避免使用潜在的偏见数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scared as a hare: effects of capture and experimental disturbance on survival and movement behavior of European hares
Capture and handling of wildlife is an important component of wildlife studies, and hunting can be a central tool for wildlife management. However, human-caused disturbance of animals can cause various negative effects on individuals. Thus, an increased understanding of different disturbances on animals will allow improved mitigation of human stressors for wildlife, and provides the basis for data-censoring when using information obtained from captured individuals. Here, we investigated the effects of capture and handling, as well as experimental disturbance, on the movement behavior of GPS-collared European hares Lepus europaeus. Of 28 hares captured in box traps, three died during handling to fit GPS collars, likely due to acute stress. Apart from an 11% decrease in activity in both sexes the first four days after capture compared to later, capture events had no significant effects on subsequent movement behavior. Hares that were disturbed experimentally, i.e. flushed with or without a shotgun shot fired, moved on average (± SD) 422 ± 206 m directly subsequent to the disturbance, leading to a spatial displacement of their short-term home range and an increased daily home range size on the disturbance day. Home range sizes returned to their before disturbance size on the following days, but hares remained further from field edges and spent more time in short vegetation in the days after simulated hunting, though this effect was comparatively small. Overall, our findings indicate that hares only marginally changed their movement behavior in response to short-term disturbances. Therefore, capture and hunting disturbance should not have severe negative effects on the movement behavior of individuals, but future studies should aim to reduce acute capture-related stress to avoid mortalities. We recommend that researchers should censor the first four days after capture from their analyses to avoid using potentially biased data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wildlife Biology
Wildlife Biology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: WILDLIFE BIOLOGY is a high-quality scientific forum directing concise and up-to-date information to scientists, administrators, wildlife managers and conservationists. The journal encourages and welcomes original papers, short communications and reviews written in English from throughout the world. The journal accepts theoretical, empirical, and practical articles of high standard from all areas of wildlife science with the primary task of creating the scientific basis for the enhancement of wildlife management practices. Our concept of ''wildlife'' mainly includes mammal and bird species, but studies on other species or phenomena relevant to wildlife management are also of great interest. We adopt a broad concept of wildlife management, including all structures and actions with the purpose of conservation, sustainable use, and/or control of wildlife and its habitats, in order to safeguard sustainable relationships between wildlife and other human interests.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信