自然灾害核算的历史视角

IF 1.7 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
{"title":"自然灾害核算的历史视角","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/10323732221095130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In prior centuries, natural disasters have struck different territories, organisations and societies, thus challenging the existence of human beings, businesses, local, regional, national and global systems. Indeed, the rhythm of lives of prior centuries have been punctuated by the ‘sudden, rapid and destructive effects’ of natural disasters, like earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes, bushfires, floods, and volcanic eruptions. Regrettably, besides these, there are also natural ‘slow moving’ catastrophic events, such as droughts and epidemics (plague, cholera, typhoid fever, Spanish flu, and similar) which have marked the calendar of global history, provoking death tolls and economic and social impacts, which are certainly comparable – if not worse – than the current Covid-19 disaster. Suffice to say that in 1347–1351, although there are no exact figures, the bubonic plague provoked a death toll of around 200 million people, who were 30 per cent of the world population at the time. Indeed, in Europe the so-called ‘Black Death’ killed an estimated 25–30 million people and, for example, 60 per cent of Florence’s population died from the plague. Moreover, and in a related manner, it is worthy to note that often natural disasters are interconnected: for example, the US Dust Bowl in the mid-1930s unleashed plagues of jackrabbits and grasshoppers and triggered influenza, dust pneumonia, and lung diseases which often proved fatal. History is rich with evidence of natural disasters, however, to date, a few scattered studies in accounting history have closely examined the relationships between accounting and these catastrophic events. This special issue seeks for historical contributions that include, but are not limited to the following topics:","PeriodicalId":45774,"journal":{"name":"Accounting History","volume":"27 1","pages":"300 - 301"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accounting for Natural Disasters: An Historical Perspective\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10323732221095130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In prior centuries, natural disasters have struck different territories, organisations and societies, thus challenging the existence of human beings, businesses, local, regional, national and global systems. Indeed, the rhythm of lives of prior centuries have been punctuated by the ‘sudden, rapid and destructive effects’ of natural disasters, like earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes, bushfires, floods, and volcanic eruptions. Regrettably, besides these, there are also natural ‘slow moving’ catastrophic events, such as droughts and epidemics (plague, cholera, typhoid fever, Spanish flu, and similar) which have marked the calendar of global history, provoking death tolls and economic and social impacts, which are certainly comparable – if not worse – than the current Covid-19 disaster. Suffice to say that in 1347–1351, although there are no exact figures, the bubonic plague provoked a death toll of around 200 million people, who were 30 per cent of the world population at the time. Indeed, in Europe the so-called ‘Black Death’ killed an estimated 25–30 million people and, for example, 60 per cent of Florence’s population died from the plague. Moreover, and in a related manner, it is worthy to note that often natural disasters are interconnected: for example, the US Dust Bowl in the mid-1930s unleashed plagues of jackrabbits and grasshoppers and triggered influenza, dust pneumonia, and lung diseases which often proved fatal. History is rich with evidence of natural disasters, however, to date, a few scattered studies in accounting history have closely examined the relationships between accounting and these catastrophic events. This special issue seeks for historical contributions that include, but are not limited to the following topics:\",\"PeriodicalId\":45774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting History\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"300 - 301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10323732221095130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10323732221095130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几个世纪里,自然灾害袭击了不同的地区、组织和社会,从而挑战了人类、企业、地方、地区、国家和全球系统的生存。事实上,前几个世纪的生活节奏被地震、海啸、飓风、丛林大火、洪水和火山爆发等自然灾害的“突然、迅速和破坏性影响”所打断。令人遗憾的是,除此之外,还有一些自然的“缓慢”灾难性事件,如干旱和流行病(瘟疫、霍乱、伤寒、西班牙流感等),它们标志着全球历史的日历,造成了死亡人数以及经济和社会影响,即使不是更糟,也肯定与当前的新冠肺炎灾难相当。可以说,在1347-1351年,尽管没有确切的数字,但黑死病造成了约2亿人的死亡,他们占当时世界人口的30%。事实上,在欧洲,所谓的“黑死病”估计造成2500万至3000万人死亡,例如,佛罗伦萨60%的人口死于瘟疫。此外,值得注意的是,自然灾害往往是相互关联的:例如,20世纪30年代中期的美国沙尘暴引发了兔子和蚱蜢的瘟疫,并引发了流感、粉尘性肺炎和肺部疾病,这些疾病往往被证明是致命的。历史上有丰富的自然灾害证据,但迄今为止,会计史上的一些零散研究已经仔细研究了会计与这些灾难性事件之间的关系。本特刊寻求历史贡献,包括但不限于以下主题:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accounting for Natural Disasters: An Historical Perspective
In prior centuries, natural disasters have struck different territories, organisations and societies, thus challenging the existence of human beings, businesses, local, regional, national and global systems. Indeed, the rhythm of lives of prior centuries have been punctuated by the ‘sudden, rapid and destructive effects’ of natural disasters, like earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes, bushfires, floods, and volcanic eruptions. Regrettably, besides these, there are also natural ‘slow moving’ catastrophic events, such as droughts and epidemics (plague, cholera, typhoid fever, Spanish flu, and similar) which have marked the calendar of global history, provoking death tolls and economic and social impacts, which are certainly comparable – if not worse – than the current Covid-19 disaster. Suffice to say that in 1347–1351, although there are no exact figures, the bubonic plague provoked a death toll of around 200 million people, who were 30 per cent of the world population at the time. Indeed, in Europe the so-called ‘Black Death’ killed an estimated 25–30 million people and, for example, 60 per cent of Florence’s population died from the plague. Moreover, and in a related manner, it is worthy to note that often natural disasters are interconnected: for example, the US Dust Bowl in the mid-1930s unleashed plagues of jackrabbits and grasshoppers and triggered influenza, dust pneumonia, and lung diseases which often proved fatal. History is rich with evidence of natural disasters, however, to date, a few scattered studies in accounting history have closely examined the relationships between accounting and these catastrophic events. This special issue seeks for historical contributions that include, but are not limited to the following topics:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounting History
Accounting History BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Accounting History is an international peer reviewed journal that aims to publish high quality historical papers. These could be concerned with exploring the advent and development of accounting bodies, conventions, ideas, practices and rules. They should attempt to identify the individuals and also the local, time-specific environmental factors which affected accounting, and should endeavour to assess accounting"s impact on organisational and social functioning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信