密歇根州音乐师生学习目标的内容分析

IF 0.8 2区 艺术学 0 MUSIC
Ryan D. Shaw, D. Potter
{"title":"密歇根州音乐师生学习目标的内容分析","authors":"Ryan D. Shaw, D. Potter","doi":"10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.229.0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n States have revamped teacher evaluations over the last 10 years to include teacher performance ratings based on student achievement/growth, presenting a challenge in nontested subjects such as music. The most common approach has been to measure music teacher effectiveness based on teacher-designed student learning objectives (SLOs), but almost no evidence exists on SLO processes. The purpose of this study was to examine the assessments and parameters used in SLOs. Specific research questions were: (a) What assessments are used to measure student growth? (b) What is the overall design for demonstrating student growth? (c) What are the parameters for teacher goal setting in the SLO process? We analyzed 35 SLOs across six districts in Michigan and coded them for assessment content, growth design, and particulars of teacher-level goal setting. Results indicate that most SLOs were based on students’ musical performance assessed with a rating scale, or based on knowledge of musical notation with pencil-and-paper tests. Musical creativity and response were almost completely absent. Almost all SLOs used a pretest/posttest design, but particulars of growth and judging teacher success differed considerably. We offer implications for teachers, administrators, and policy makers concerned with music teacher evaluations.","PeriodicalId":46393,"journal":{"name":"BULLETIN OF THE COUNCIL FOR RESEARCH IN MUSIC EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Content Analysis of Music Teacher Student Learning Objectives in Michigan\",\"authors\":\"Ryan D. Shaw, D. Potter\",\"doi\":\"10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.229.0029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n States have revamped teacher evaluations over the last 10 years to include teacher performance ratings based on student achievement/growth, presenting a challenge in nontested subjects such as music. The most common approach has been to measure music teacher effectiveness based on teacher-designed student learning objectives (SLOs), but almost no evidence exists on SLO processes. The purpose of this study was to examine the assessments and parameters used in SLOs. Specific research questions were: (a) What assessments are used to measure student growth? (b) What is the overall design for demonstrating student growth? (c) What are the parameters for teacher goal setting in the SLO process? We analyzed 35 SLOs across six districts in Michigan and coded them for assessment content, growth design, and particulars of teacher-level goal setting. Results indicate that most SLOs were based on students’ musical performance assessed with a rating scale, or based on knowledge of musical notation with pencil-and-paper tests. Musical creativity and response were almost completely absent. Almost all SLOs used a pretest/posttest design, but particulars of growth and judging teacher success differed considerably. We offer implications for teachers, administrators, and policy makers concerned with music teacher evaluations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BULLETIN OF THE COUNCIL FOR RESEARCH IN MUSIC EDUCATION\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BULLETIN OF THE COUNCIL FOR RESEARCH IN MUSIC EDUCATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.229.0029\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BULLETIN OF THE COUNCIL FOR RESEARCH IN MUSIC EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.229.0029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去10年中,各州修改了教师评估,将基于学生成绩/成长的教师表现评级纳入其中,这对音乐等非测试科目提出了挑战。最常见的方法是根据教师设计的学生学习目标(SLO)来衡量音乐教师的有效性,但几乎没有关于SLO过程的证据。本研究的目的是检查SLO中使用的评估和参数。具体的研究问题是:(a)用什么评估来衡量学生的成长?(b) 展示学生成长的总体设计是什么?(c) SLO过程中教师目标设定的参数是什么?我们分析了密歇根州六个地区的35个SLO,并对其进行了评估内容、成长设计和教师水平目标设定细节的编码。结果表明,大多数SLO是基于用评分量表评估的学生的音乐表现,或基于用铅笔和纸测试的乐谱知识。音乐的创造力和反应几乎完全没有。几乎所有的SLO都使用了前测/后测设计,但成长和判断教师成功的细节差异很大。我们为关心音乐教师评估的教师、管理人员和政策制定者提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Content Analysis of Music Teacher Student Learning Objectives in Michigan
States have revamped teacher evaluations over the last 10 years to include teacher performance ratings based on student achievement/growth, presenting a challenge in nontested subjects such as music. The most common approach has been to measure music teacher effectiveness based on teacher-designed student learning objectives (SLOs), but almost no evidence exists on SLO processes. The purpose of this study was to examine the assessments and parameters used in SLOs. Specific research questions were: (a) What assessments are used to measure student growth? (b) What is the overall design for demonstrating student growth? (c) What are the parameters for teacher goal setting in the SLO process? We analyzed 35 SLOs across six districts in Michigan and coded them for assessment content, growth design, and particulars of teacher-level goal setting. Results indicate that most SLOs were based on students’ musical performance assessed with a rating scale, or based on knowledge of musical notation with pencil-and-paper tests. Musical creativity and response were almost completely absent. Almost all SLOs used a pretest/posttest design, but particulars of growth and judging teacher success differed considerably. We offer implications for teachers, administrators, and policy makers concerned with music teacher evaluations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education (CRME) provides a forum where contemporary research is made accessible to all with interest in music education. The Bulletin contains current research, and reviews of interest to the international music education profession. Dr. Gregory DeNardo is editor and works with an advisory committee of music education"s most prestigious researchers. The Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education provides an outlet for scholarly publication and is one of music education’s leading publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信