南非一家三级医院的念珠菌血症发病率和耐唑念珠菌血症患病率——2016年至2020年的回顾性实验室分析

IF 1.4 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
V. Chibabhai
{"title":"南非一家三级医院的念珠菌血症发病率和耐唑念珠菌血症患病率——2016年至2020年的回顾性实验室分析","authors":"V. Chibabhai","doi":"10.4102/sajid.v37i1.326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Candidemia is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The epidemiology of candidemia has changed globally over the past 20 years. South African surveillance demonstrated a shift in epidemiology from Candida albicans to non-albicans species including Candida parapsilosis and Candida auris. Hospital-level candidemia incidence from South Africa has not been reported previously. Methods We performed a retrospective laboratory-based analysis of blood cultures with confirmed causative agents of candidemia. Ward type, department, gender and admission to critical care units were captured. Data were analysed in Microsoft Excel, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) and Epitools. Results The incidence of candidemia during the study period was 2.87 per 1000 admissions. The total proportion of non-albicans species causing candidemia was 425/618 (69.7%). Overall, 65.4% of candidemia cases occurred in non-critical care units. There was a significant increase in the proportion of C. auris isolates between 2016 and 2020 (p < 0.001). Isolation of C. auris was associated with admission to critical care units (p < 0.001, odds ration [OR] 3.856, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.360–6.300). The proportion of azole-resistant candidemia cases increased from 21/53 (39.6%) in 2016 to 41/59 (69.5%) in 2020 (p = 0.002). Conclusion The incidence of candidemia remained stable over the five-year study period. However, the proportion of C. auris isolates increased significantly during the study period as did the overall proportion of azole-resistant candidemia. Antifungal stewardship and continued hospital-level surveillance are imperative.","PeriodicalId":44007,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence of candidemia and prevalence of azole-resistant candidemia at a tertiary South African hospital – A retrospective laboratory analysis 2016–2020\",\"authors\":\"V. Chibabhai\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/sajid.v37i1.326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Candidemia is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The epidemiology of candidemia has changed globally over the past 20 years. South African surveillance demonstrated a shift in epidemiology from Candida albicans to non-albicans species including Candida parapsilosis and Candida auris. Hospital-level candidemia incidence from South Africa has not been reported previously. Methods We performed a retrospective laboratory-based analysis of blood cultures with confirmed causative agents of candidemia. Ward type, department, gender and admission to critical care units were captured. Data were analysed in Microsoft Excel, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) and Epitools. Results The incidence of candidemia during the study period was 2.87 per 1000 admissions. The total proportion of non-albicans species causing candidemia was 425/618 (69.7%). Overall, 65.4% of candidemia cases occurred in non-critical care units. There was a significant increase in the proportion of C. auris isolates between 2016 and 2020 (p < 0.001). Isolation of C. auris was associated with admission to critical care units (p < 0.001, odds ration [OR] 3.856, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.360–6.300). The proportion of azole-resistant candidemia cases increased from 21/53 (39.6%) in 2016 to 41/59 (69.5%) in 2020 (p = 0.002). Conclusion The incidence of candidemia remained stable over the five-year study period. However, the proportion of C. auris isolates increased significantly during the study period as did the overall proportion of azole-resistant candidemia. Antifungal stewardship and continued hospital-level surveillance are imperative.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajid.v37i1.326\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajid.v37i1.326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景念珠菌血症与高发病率和高死亡率有关。在过去的20年里,念珠菌血症的流行病学在全球范围内发生了变化。南非的监测表明,流行病学从白色念珠菌向非白色念珠菌转变,包括近裸念珠菌和耳念珠菌。南非的医院级念珠菌血症发病率以前没有报道。方法我们对已确认为念珠菌血症病原体的血液培养进行了回顾性实验室分析。记录了病房类型、科室、性别和进入重症监护室的情况。数据在Microsoft Excel、社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)和Epitools中进行分析。结果研究期间念珠菌血症的发生率为2.87/1000。非白色念珠菌引起念珠菌血症的总比例为425/618(69.7%)。总体而言,65.4%的念珠菌血症病例发生在非重症监护室。2016年至2020年间,金黄色葡萄球菌分离株的比例显著增加(p<0.001)。金黄色葡萄杆菌分离株与进入重症监护室有关(p<0.001,比值比[OR]3.856,95%置信区间[CI]:2.360–6.300)。唑耐药性念珠菌血症病例的比例从2016年的21/53(39.6%)增加到2020年的41/59(69.5%)(p=0.002)。结论在五年的研究期间,念珠菌血症的发病率保持稳定。然而,在研究期间,金黄色葡萄球菌分离株的比例显著增加,耐唑念珠菌血症的总体比例也显著增加。抗菌管理和持续的医院级监测势在必行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incidence of candidemia and prevalence of azole-resistant candidemia at a tertiary South African hospital – A retrospective laboratory analysis 2016–2020
Background Candidemia is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The epidemiology of candidemia has changed globally over the past 20 years. South African surveillance demonstrated a shift in epidemiology from Candida albicans to non-albicans species including Candida parapsilosis and Candida auris. Hospital-level candidemia incidence from South Africa has not been reported previously. Methods We performed a retrospective laboratory-based analysis of blood cultures with confirmed causative agents of candidemia. Ward type, department, gender and admission to critical care units were captured. Data were analysed in Microsoft Excel, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) and Epitools. Results The incidence of candidemia during the study period was 2.87 per 1000 admissions. The total proportion of non-albicans species causing candidemia was 425/618 (69.7%). Overall, 65.4% of candidemia cases occurred in non-critical care units. There was a significant increase in the proportion of C. auris isolates between 2016 and 2020 (p < 0.001). Isolation of C. auris was associated with admission to critical care units (p < 0.001, odds ration [OR] 3.856, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.360–6.300). The proportion of azole-resistant candidemia cases increased from 21/53 (39.6%) in 2016 to 41/59 (69.5%) in 2020 (p = 0.002). Conclusion The incidence of candidemia remained stable over the five-year study period. However, the proportion of C. auris isolates increased significantly during the study period as did the overall proportion of azole-resistant candidemia. Antifungal stewardship and continued hospital-level surveillance are imperative.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
11.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信