{"title":"移动前瘀伤、亲属关系网络和新冠肺炎影响的进一步证据","authors":"R. Sen, C. Kerr","doi":"10.1080/09503153.2023.2241278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As per a prior editorial decision, we have prioritised allocating articles with an explicit and significant COVID-19 theme to an issue of the journal. Accordingly, we start this edition with Sue Connell’s study of child and family social workers' experiences in a London Local Authority accessing social work supervision between March 2020 and January 2021, during the pandemic. Twenty-two respondents filled out a survey regarding their experiences, and eight took part in semi-structured interviews on their experiences. The findings suggested that there were, in fact, marked advantages to online supervision for supervisees in this period including a sense of managerial investment in supervision, and the lesser likelihood of a supervisor being called away from supervision due to other responsibilities. While it appeared that case management predominated within discussions, opportunities for learning and development were also in evidence within online supervision. There were also challenges in that some supervisees felt less well emotionally held compared to in-person interaction, and there were some issues relating to the confidentiality of online supervision discussions due to the physical environments in which it occurred. Our second article on a COVID-19 them is Lia Ara ujo, Sofia Fontoura, Xos e Manuel Cid-Fern andez, and Liliana Sousa’s highly interesting study of the photovoice reports of 12 social workers working within settings for older adults in Portugal in the first year of the pandemic. In the study the social workers shared the photos they had taken, and associated narratives, in a group discussion. The group discussion was then analysed. The findings illustrate how the social workers had experienced “forced growth,” developing personally and professionally in response to the enforced context of an unprecedented health crisis.","PeriodicalId":35184,"journal":{"name":"Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Premobile bruising, kinship networks and further evidence of the impacts of COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"R. Sen, C. Kerr\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09503153.2023.2241278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As per a prior editorial decision, we have prioritised allocating articles with an explicit and significant COVID-19 theme to an issue of the journal. Accordingly, we start this edition with Sue Connell’s study of child and family social workers' experiences in a London Local Authority accessing social work supervision between March 2020 and January 2021, during the pandemic. Twenty-two respondents filled out a survey regarding their experiences, and eight took part in semi-structured interviews on their experiences. The findings suggested that there were, in fact, marked advantages to online supervision for supervisees in this period including a sense of managerial investment in supervision, and the lesser likelihood of a supervisor being called away from supervision due to other responsibilities. While it appeared that case management predominated within discussions, opportunities for learning and development were also in evidence within online supervision. There were also challenges in that some supervisees felt less well emotionally held compared to in-person interaction, and there were some issues relating to the confidentiality of online supervision discussions due to the physical environments in which it occurred. Our second article on a COVID-19 them is Lia Ara ujo, Sofia Fontoura, Xos e Manuel Cid-Fern andez, and Liliana Sousa’s highly interesting study of the photovoice reports of 12 social workers working within settings for older adults in Portugal in the first year of the pandemic. In the study the social workers shared the photos they had taken, and associated narratives, in a group discussion. The group discussion was then analysed. The findings illustrate how the social workers had experienced “forced growth,” developing personally and professionally in response to the enforced context of an unprecedented health crisis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2023.2241278\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2023.2241278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
根据之前的编辑决定,我们优先将新冠肺炎主题明确而重要的文章分配到期刊上。因此,我们从Sue Connell对2020年3月至2021年1月期间,在疫情期间,儿童和家庭社会工作者在伦敦地方当局接受社会工作监督的经历进行的研究开始。22名受访者填写了一份关于他们经历的调查,8名受访者参加了关于他们经验的半结构化访谈。调查结果表明,事实上,在这一时期,在线监督对被监督人有明显的好处,包括对监督的管理投资感,以及监督人因其他责任而被取消监督的可能性较小。虽然案例管理似乎在讨论中占主导地位,但在线监督中也有学习和发展的机会。还有一个挑战是,与面对面的互动相比,一些被监督者感觉情绪不太好,而且由于在线监督讨论发生的物理环境,存在一些与保密性有关的问题。我们关于新冠肺炎的第二篇文章是Lia Ara ujo、Sofia Fontoura、Xos e Manuel Cid-Fern andez和Liliana Sousa对12名社会工作者在疫情第一年为葡萄牙老年人工作的照片语音报告进行的非常有趣的研究。在这项研究中,社会工作者在小组讨论中分享了他们拍摄的照片以及相关的叙述。然后对小组讨论进行了分析。研究结果表明,社会工作者是如何经历“被迫成长”的,在应对前所未有的健康危机的强制背景下,他们的个人和职业发展。
Premobile bruising, kinship networks and further evidence of the impacts of COVID-19
As per a prior editorial decision, we have prioritised allocating articles with an explicit and significant COVID-19 theme to an issue of the journal. Accordingly, we start this edition with Sue Connell’s study of child and family social workers' experiences in a London Local Authority accessing social work supervision between March 2020 and January 2021, during the pandemic. Twenty-two respondents filled out a survey regarding their experiences, and eight took part in semi-structured interviews on their experiences. The findings suggested that there were, in fact, marked advantages to online supervision for supervisees in this period including a sense of managerial investment in supervision, and the lesser likelihood of a supervisor being called away from supervision due to other responsibilities. While it appeared that case management predominated within discussions, opportunities for learning and development were also in evidence within online supervision. There were also challenges in that some supervisees felt less well emotionally held compared to in-person interaction, and there were some issues relating to the confidentiality of online supervision discussions due to the physical environments in which it occurred. Our second article on a COVID-19 them is Lia Ara ujo, Sofia Fontoura, Xos e Manuel Cid-Fern andez, and Liliana Sousa’s highly interesting study of the photovoice reports of 12 social workers working within settings for older adults in Portugal in the first year of the pandemic. In the study the social workers shared the photos they had taken, and associated narratives, in a group discussion. The group discussion was then analysed. The findings illustrate how the social workers had experienced “forced growth,” developing personally and professionally in response to the enforced context of an unprecedented health crisis.