沙皮拉手稿正体学札记：伪造者的标记

IF 0.2 2区哲学 0 RELIGION

ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE ALTTESTAMENTLICHE WISSENSCHAFT Pub Date : 2021-05-26 DOI:10.1515/zaw-2021-2008

Ronald S. Hendel

{"title":"沙皮拉手稿正体学札记：伪造者的标记","authors":"Ronald S. Hendel","doi":"10.1515/zaw-2021-2008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Shapira manuscripts, putatively precursors of Deuteronomy, have many indications of forgery, particularly in the orthography, which mixes the writing conventions of the Mesha stele and the Hebrew Bible. Notably, the consistent use of waw, instead of he, to mark final ō is an anachronism. These problems were not perceivable by the text’s nineteenth century critics (or its forgers), but in hindsight are clear marks of the forger’s art.","PeriodicalId":45627,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE ALTTESTAMENTLICHE WISSENSCHAFT","volume":"133 1","pages":"225 - 230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/zaw-2021-2008","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Notes on the Orthography of the Shapira Manuscripts: The Forger’s Marks\",\"authors\":\"Ronald S. Hendel\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/zaw-2021-2008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The Shapira manuscripts, putatively precursors of Deuteronomy, have many indications of forgery, particularly in the orthography, which mixes the writing conventions of the Mesha stele and the Hebrew Bible. Notably, the consistent use of waw, instead of he, to mark final ō is an anachronism. These problems were not perceivable by the text’s nineteenth century critics (or its forgers), but in hindsight are clear marks of the forger’s art.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE ALTTESTAMENTLICHE WISSENSCHAFT\",\"volume\":\"133 1\",\"pages\":\"225 - 230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/zaw-2021-2008\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE ALTTESTAMENTLICHE WISSENSCHAFT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/zaw-2021-2008\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE ALTTESTAMENTLICHE WISSENSCHAFT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zaw-2021-2008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要夏皮拉手稿，被认为是申命记的前身，有许多伪造的迹象，特别是在正字法方面，它混合了米沙石碑和希伯来圣经的书写惯例。值得注意的是，一贯使用waw而不是he来标记finalō是一个时代错误。这些问题是十九世纪的评论家（或伪造者）无法察觉的，但事后看来，这些问题是伪造者艺术的明显标志。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Notes on the Orthography of the Shapira Manuscripts: The Forger’s Marks

Abstract The Shapira manuscripts, putatively precursors of Deuteronomy, have many indications of forgery, particularly in the orthography, which mixes the writing conventions of the Mesha stele and the Hebrew Bible. Notably, the consistent use of waw, instead of he, to mark final ō is an anachronism. These problems were not perceivable by the text’s nineteenth century critics (or its forgers), but in hindsight are clear marks of the forger’s art.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE ALTTESTAMENTLICHE WISSENSCHAFT RELIGION-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, which is published in four issues of 160 pages each plus supplements, has been the leading international and interconfessional periodical in the field of research in the Old Testament und Early Judaism for over one hundred years. Open to various ways of posing the questions of scholarship, the journal features high quality contributions in English, German, and French. Through its review of periodicals and books, it provides fast and reliable information concerning new publications in the field.