你不能吃生物多样性:欧洲水生环境法中的代理和非理性规范

IF 0.8 Q4 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
T. O’Higgins
{"title":"你不能吃生物多样性:欧洲水生环境法中的代理和非理性规范","authors":"T. O’Higgins","doi":"10.12924/CIS2017.05010043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Policies of the European Union cover a range of social, environmental and economic aspirations and the current environmental directives and laws have evolved from a suite of norms which have changed over time. These may be characterised loosely according to 'Three Ps': Practical, those taking an anthropocentric approach; Pure, those taking an ecocentric approach and Popular, those appealing to the general public. In this paper I use these three perspectives as a tool to analyse the complexity and identify contradictions in European aquatic environmental legislation. Some trade-offs between development and conservation are identified and used to characterise the potential qualities of more successful agency to achieve environmental goals in the governance of European aquatic environments.","PeriodicalId":9944,"journal":{"name":"Challenges in Sustainability","volume":"5 1","pages":"43-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"You Can't Eat Biodiversity: Agency and Irrational Norms in European Aquatic Environmental Law\",\"authors\":\"T. O’Higgins\",\"doi\":\"10.12924/CIS2017.05010043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Policies of the European Union cover a range of social, environmental and economic aspirations and the current environmental directives and laws have evolved from a suite of norms which have changed over time. These may be characterised loosely according to 'Three Ps': Practical, those taking an anthropocentric approach; Pure, those taking an ecocentric approach and Popular, those appealing to the general public. In this paper I use these three perspectives as a tool to analyse the complexity and identify contradictions in European aquatic environmental legislation. Some trade-offs between development and conservation are identified and used to characterise the potential qualities of more successful agency to achieve environmental goals in the governance of European aquatic environments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Challenges in Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"43-51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Challenges in Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12924/CIS2017.05010043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Challenges in Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12924/CIS2017.05010043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

欧洲联盟的政策涵盖了一系列的社会、环境和经济愿望,目前的环境指令和法律是由一系列随时间变化的规范演变而来的。这些可能大致按照“三个P”来描述:实用的,那些采取以人类为中心的方法的;纯粹的,那些采取以生态为中心的方法的,流行的,那些吸引公众的。在本文中,我利用这三个视角来分析欧洲水生环境立法的复杂性和矛盾。确定了发展和保护之间的一些权衡,并用于描述更成功的机构在欧洲水生环境治理中实现环境目标的潜在品质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
You Can't Eat Biodiversity: Agency and Irrational Norms in European Aquatic Environmental Law
Policies of the European Union cover a range of social, environmental and economic aspirations and the current environmental directives and laws have evolved from a suite of norms which have changed over time. These may be characterised loosely according to 'Three Ps': Practical, those taking an anthropocentric approach; Pure, those taking an ecocentric approach and Popular, those appealing to the general public. In this paper I use these three perspectives as a tool to analyse the complexity and identify contradictions in European aquatic environmental legislation. Some trade-offs between development and conservation are identified and used to characterise the potential qualities of more successful agency to achieve environmental goals in the governance of European aquatic environments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Challenges in Sustainability
Challenges in Sustainability GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信