联合国1994年卢旺达种族灭绝期间行动独立调查1999年报告的一些交战规则遗产

Q4 Social Sciences

Journal of International Peacekeeping Pub Date : 2020-04-08 DOI:10.1163/18754112-0220104018

R. McLaughlin

{"title":"联合国1994年卢旺达种族灭绝期间行动独立调查1999年报告的一些交战规则遗产","authors":"R. McLaughlin","doi":"10.1163/18754112-0220104018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The United Nations Assistance Mission in Rwanda (unamir) has gone down in history as one of the worst failures in the history of the United Nations. The shortcomings of the mission were the focus of several reports. In this paper, Rob McLaughlin analyses some of the key findings of the various reports, with an emphasis on the rules of engagement framework and how it was interpreted at various points throughout the mission.","PeriodicalId":38927,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Peacekeeping","volume":"22 1","pages":"282-324"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18754112-0220104018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some Rules of Engagement Legacies of the 1999 Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Actions of the United Nations during the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda\",\"authors\":\"R. McLaughlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18754112-0220104018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The United Nations Assistance Mission in Rwanda (unamir) has gone down in history as one of the worst failures in the history of the United Nations. The shortcomings of the mission were the focus of several reports. In this paper, Rob McLaughlin analyses some of the key findings of the various reports, with an emphasis on the rules of engagement framework and how it was interpreted at various points throughout the mission.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Peacekeeping\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"282-324\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18754112-0220104018\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Peacekeeping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18754112-0220104018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Peacekeeping","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18754112-0220104018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

联合国卢旺达援助团（卢旺达援助团）作为联合国历史上最严重的失败之一载入史册。特派团的缺点是几份报告的重点。在本文中，Rob McLaughlin分析了各种报告的一些关键发现，重点介绍了交战规则框架以及在整个任务的各个阶段如何对其进行解释。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Some Rules of Engagement Legacies of the 1999 Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Actions of the United Nations during the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda

The United Nations Assistance Mission in Rwanda (unamir) has gone down in history as one of the worst failures in the history of the United Nations. The shortcomings of the mission were the focus of several reports. In this paper, Rob McLaughlin analyses some of the key findings of the various reports, with an emphasis on the rules of engagement framework and how it was interpreted at various points throughout the mission.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of International Peacekeeping Medicine-Infectious Diseases

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量