{"title":"雪莱玛格丽特·尼科尔森遗作中的政治、请愿与暴力","authors":"Matthew C. Borushko","doi":"10.1080/09524142.2020.1822012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This essay examines Percy Bysshe Shelley’s 1810 work Posthumous Fragments of Margaret Nicholson. By returning to the political moment of the work’s composition and publication, I establish a new and formative context for the work (which is often considered juvenilia and consequently less closely read than it could be): the political turmoil surrounding petitions in 1810. As I demonstrate, the poem, from its choice of Nicholson as a subject to its thematic and formal gestures, dramatizes the political dead-end of the liberal faith in petitions and, ultimately, offers a radical critique of the ideology from which they derive and their consequent violence. Indeed, what emerges in the Posthumous Fragments is a typology of violence linking the structural violence of monarchy with forms of empirical violence such as war and suffering. And finally, to show the sustained relevance of this dynamic in Shelley’s political imagination, I conclude by briefly discussing the role of petitions in The Cenci.","PeriodicalId":41387,"journal":{"name":"KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW","volume":"34 1","pages":"97 - 106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09524142.2020.1822012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Politics, Petitions, and Violence in Shelley’s Posthumous Fragments of Margaret Nicholson\",\"authors\":\"Matthew C. Borushko\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09524142.2020.1822012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This essay examines Percy Bysshe Shelley’s 1810 work Posthumous Fragments of Margaret Nicholson. By returning to the political moment of the work’s composition and publication, I establish a new and formative context for the work (which is often considered juvenilia and consequently less closely read than it could be): the political turmoil surrounding petitions in 1810. As I demonstrate, the poem, from its choice of Nicholson as a subject to its thematic and formal gestures, dramatizes the political dead-end of the liberal faith in petitions and, ultimately, offers a radical critique of the ideology from which they derive and their consequent violence. Indeed, what emerges in the Posthumous Fragments is a typology of violence linking the structural violence of monarchy with forms of empirical violence such as war and suffering. And finally, to show the sustained relevance of this dynamic in Shelley’s political imagination, I conclude by briefly discussing the role of petitions in The Cenci.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"97 - 106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09524142.2020.1822012\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09524142.2020.1822012\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"POETRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09524142.2020.1822012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Politics, Petitions, and Violence in Shelley’s Posthumous Fragments of Margaret Nicholson
ABSTRACT This essay examines Percy Bysshe Shelley’s 1810 work Posthumous Fragments of Margaret Nicholson. By returning to the political moment of the work’s composition and publication, I establish a new and formative context for the work (which is often considered juvenilia and consequently less closely read than it could be): the political turmoil surrounding petitions in 1810. As I demonstrate, the poem, from its choice of Nicholson as a subject to its thematic and formal gestures, dramatizes the political dead-end of the liberal faith in petitions and, ultimately, offers a radical critique of the ideology from which they derive and their consequent violence. Indeed, what emerges in the Posthumous Fragments is a typology of violence linking the structural violence of monarchy with forms of empirical violence such as war and suffering. And finally, to show the sustained relevance of this dynamic in Shelley’s political imagination, I conclude by briefly discussing the role of petitions in The Cenci.
期刊介绍:
The Keats-Shelley Review has been published by the Keats-Shelley Memorial Association for almost 100 years. It has a unique identity and broad appeal, embracing Romanticism, English Literature and Anglo-Italian relations. A diverse range of items are published within the Review, including notes, prize-winning essays and contemporary poetry of the highest quality, around a core of peer-reviewed academic articles, essays and reviews. The editor, Professor Nicholas Roe, along with the newly established editorial board, seeks to develop the depth and quality of the contributions, whilst retaining the Review’s distinctive and accessible nature.