萨法提克语中的ʾdr月和“阿拉伯”阿拉姆语中螺旋体的地位

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION

Aramaic Studies Pub Date : 2020-11-17 DOI:10.1163/17455227-bja10013

A. Al‐Jallad

{"title":"萨法提克语中的ʾdr月和“阿拉伯”阿拉姆语中螺旋体的地位","authors":"A. Al‐Jallad","doi":"10.1163/17455227-bja10013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article discusses the status of spirantisation in the Aramaic of Arabia based on transcriptions in Safaitic and other ancient Arabian languages. I suggest that ‘Arabian’ Aramaic pronunciation stems from an archaic variety of the language introduced by the Babylonians and Achaemenids in the mid-first millennium BCE. This variety lacked post-vocalic spirantisation and formed the basis for the local pronunciation of later Aramaic varieties, accounting for the archaic phonology of Aramaic loans into Arabian languages.","PeriodicalId":41594,"journal":{"name":"Aramaic Studies","volume":"18 1","pages":"147-170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Month ʾdr in Safaitic and the Status of Spirantisation in ‘Arabian’ Aramaic\",\"authors\":\"A. Al‐Jallad\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/17455227-bja10013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article discusses the status of spirantisation in the Aramaic of Arabia based on transcriptions in Safaitic and other ancient Arabian languages. I suggest that ‘Arabian’ Aramaic pronunciation stems from an archaic variety of the language introduced by the Babylonians and Achaemenids in the mid-first millennium BCE. This variety lacked post-vocalic spirantisation and formed the basis for the local pronunciation of later Aramaic varieties, accounting for the archaic phonology of Aramaic loans into Arabian languages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aramaic Studies\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"147-170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aramaic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/17455227-bja10013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aramaic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/17455227-bja10013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

本文根据萨法特语和其他古阿拉伯语言的转录，讨论了螺旋体在阿拉伯阿拉姆语中的地位。我认为“阿拉伯”阿拉米语发音源于巴比伦人和阿契美尼德人在公元前一千年中期引入的一种古老的语言。这种变体缺乏发音后的螺旋化，并形成了后来阿拉姆语变体的本地发音基础，解释了阿拉姆语传入阿拉伯语言的古老音韵学。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Month ʾdr in Safaitic and the Status of Spirantisation in ‘Arabian’ Aramaic

This article discusses the status of spirantisation in the Aramaic of Arabia based on transcriptions in Safaitic and other ancient Arabian languages. I suggest that ‘Arabian’ Aramaic pronunciation stems from an archaic variety of the language introduced by the Babylonians and Achaemenids in the mid-first millennium BCE. This variety lacked post-vocalic spirantisation and formed the basis for the local pronunciation of later Aramaic varieties, accounting for the archaic phonology of Aramaic loans into Arabian languages.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Aramaic Studies RELIGION-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The journal brings all aspects of the various forms of Aramaic and their literatures together to help shape the field of Aramaic Studies. The journal, which has been the main platform for Targum and Peshitta Studies for some time, is now also the main outlet for the study of all Aramaic dialects, including the language and literatures of Old Aramaic, Achaemenid Aramaic, Palmyrene, Nabataean, Qumran Aramaic, Mandaic, Syriac, Rabbinic Aramaic, and Neo-Aramaic. Aramaic Studies seeks contributions of a linguistic, literary, exegetical or theological nature for any of the dialects and periods involved, from detailed grammatical work to narrative analysis, from short notes to fundamental research. Reviews, seminars, conference proceedings, and bibliographical surveys are also featured.