YouTube评论智能手机评论的证据和立场

IF 1.1 Q3 COMMUNICATION

Internet Pragmatics Pub Date : 2019-05-20 DOI:10.1075/IP.00025.PAR

Alejandro Parini, A. Fetzer

{"title":"YouTube评论智能手机评论的证据和立场","authors":"Alejandro Parini, A. Fetzer","doi":"10.1075/IP.00025.PAR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Online participatory environments have become saturated spaces in terms of the opportunities that they offer for the\n display of different viewpoints and ideologies. YouTube, as a popular video-sharing and networking site,\n constitutes a new media space that invites both individual and collaborative stance-taking by participants who gather, virtually,\n to address a particular topic, issue or event depicted visually and discussed textually through the comments that are posted on\n the site. This interactional dynamics triggers a dialogic sequence of follow-ups through which stances are formulated following up\n on previous stances or counterstances. Against this background, this paper reports on a case study of individual and\n collaborative, and interdiscursive and intradiscursive stance-taking in participants’ comments to an online review focusing on the\n strategic use of direct (tactile) and indirect (inferential) references to evidentiality and their co-occurrence with\n argumentative markers. In this multilayered context stance-taking does not only contribute to evaluation but also to the\n construction of collective identities.","PeriodicalId":36241,"journal":{"name":"Internet Pragmatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidentiality and stance in YouTube comments on smartphone reviews\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro Parini, A. Fetzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/IP.00025.PAR\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Online participatory environments have become saturated spaces in terms of the opportunities that they offer for the\\n display of different viewpoints and ideologies. YouTube, as a popular video-sharing and networking site,\\n constitutes a new media space that invites both individual and collaborative stance-taking by participants who gather, virtually,\\n to address a particular topic, issue or event depicted visually and discussed textually through the comments that are posted on\\n the site. This interactional dynamics triggers a dialogic sequence of follow-ups through which stances are formulated following up\\n on previous stances or counterstances. Against this background, this paper reports on a case study of individual and\\n collaborative, and interdiscursive and intradiscursive stance-taking in participants’ comments to an online review focusing on the\\n strategic use of direct (tactile) and indirect (inferential) references to evidentiality and their co-occurrence with\\n argumentative markers. In this multilayered context stance-taking does not only contribute to evaluation but also to the\\n construction of collective identities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internet Pragmatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internet Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/IP.00025.PAR\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/IP.00025.PAR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

在线参与环境已经成为展示不同观点和意识形态的饱和空间。YouTube作为一个受欢迎的视频共享和网络网站，构成了一个新的媒体空间，邀请参与者采取个人和合作的立场，他们聚集在一起，通过网站上发布的评论，以视觉方式描述和文本方式讨论特定的主题、问题或事件。这种相互作用的动态触发了后续行动的对话序列，通过该序列，在先前的立场或反立场的基础上制定立场。在这种背景下，本文报告了一个案例研究，即参与者对一篇在线评论的评论中的个人、合作、跨话语和话语内立场，重点是对证据性的直接（触觉）和间接（推理）引用的策略使用，以及它们与议论文标记的共现。在这种多层面的背景下，采取立场不仅有助于评估，也有助于构建集体身份。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Evidentiality and stance in YouTube comments on smartphone reviews

Online participatory environments have become saturated spaces in terms of the opportunities that they offer for the display of different viewpoints and ideologies. YouTube, as a popular video-sharing and networking site, constitutes a new media space that invites both individual and collaborative stance-taking by participants who gather, virtually, to address a particular topic, issue or event depicted visually and discussed textually through the comments that are posted on the site. This interactional dynamics triggers a dialogic sequence of follow-ups through which stances are formulated following up on previous stances or counterstances. Against this background, this paper reports on a case study of individual and collaborative, and interdiscursive and intradiscursive stance-taking in participants’ comments to an online review focusing on the strategic use of direct (tactile) and indirect (inferential) references to evidentiality and their co-occurrence with argumentative markers. In this multilayered context stance-taking does not only contribute to evaluation but also to the construction of collective identities.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Internet Pragmatics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量