阿拉斯加和加拿大北极/亚北极地区的新近纪和早更新世植物群:新数据、洲际比较和相关性

IF 2 4区 地球科学 Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences
T. Fletcher, A. Telka, N. Rybczynski, J. Matthews
{"title":"阿拉斯加和加拿大北极/亚北极地区的新近纪和早更新世植物群:新数据、洲际比较和相关性","authors":"T. Fletcher, A. Telka, N. Rybczynski, J. Matthews","doi":"10.26879/1121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A new correlation scheme primarily concerning macroand meso-floral remains of bryophytes and vascular plants from 26 Neogene sites and over 50 florules in Alaska and northern Canada is presented. Flora are valuable for correlating Arctic Neogene sites, especially where absolute dating methods are not possible. These taxa clearly differentiate Neogene from Quaternary deposits in the North American Arctic. Recent age estimates provided using terrestrial cosmogenic nuclide (TCN) dating provide tiepoints for these correlations and tend to confirm earlier dates achieved by relative and correlative methods. Our knowledge of North American Arctic/Subarctic palaeofloras and faunas is sufficiently detailed to allow inter-regional comparisons. This paper contains the first attempt to compare and contrast Neogene and early Pleistocene macroand meso-floras from the entire circum-Arctic region. The subfossil and fossil floras are valuable for understanding the evolution of the boreal realm, from the qualitatively different composition of the communities of the Neogene Arctic, to those of the more southerly modern boreal region. These differences may be due to the warm climate of the Neogene Arctic combined with the long dark of polar winter – a phenomenon with no modern analogue. The differences highlight the need for a comprehensive understanding of species’ ecology to predict species ranges under near-future climate conditions analogous to our Neogene past. Many sites described here present rich opportunities for future cross-disciplinary study, including research related to the role of warm-climate intervals in patterning past and present Arctic ecosystems. T.L. Fletcher. Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Management, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, Liaoning 110164, China and College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59812, United States of America. drtlfletcher@gmail.com A. Telka. PALEOTEC Services – Quaternary and late Tertiary plant macrofossil and insect fossil analyses, 1-574 Somerset St. West, Ottawa, Ontario K1R 5K2, Canada. N. Rybczynski. Department of Palaeobiology, Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 6P4, FLETCHER ET AL.: ARCTIC MACROFLORA 2 Canada. nrybczynski@nature.ca and Department of Biology and Department of Earth Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada. nrybczynski@gmail.com J.V. Matthews, Jr. 1 Cricket Lane, Hubley, Nova Scotia B3Z 1A5, Canada.","PeriodicalId":56100,"journal":{"name":"Palaeontologia Electronica","volume":" ","pages":"1-62"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neogene and early Pleistocene flora from Alaska and Arctic/Subarctic Canada: New data, intercontinental comparisons and correlations\",\"authors\":\"T. Fletcher, A. Telka, N. Rybczynski, J. Matthews\",\"doi\":\"10.26879/1121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A new correlation scheme primarily concerning macroand meso-floral remains of bryophytes and vascular plants from 26 Neogene sites and over 50 florules in Alaska and northern Canada is presented. Flora are valuable for correlating Arctic Neogene sites, especially where absolute dating methods are not possible. These taxa clearly differentiate Neogene from Quaternary deposits in the North American Arctic. Recent age estimates provided using terrestrial cosmogenic nuclide (TCN) dating provide tiepoints for these correlations and tend to confirm earlier dates achieved by relative and correlative methods. Our knowledge of North American Arctic/Subarctic palaeofloras and faunas is sufficiently detailed to allow inter-regional comparisons. This paper contains the first attempt to compare and contrast Neogene and early Pleistocene macroand meso-floras from the entire circum-Arctic region. The subfossil and fossil floras are valuable for understanding the evolution of the boreal realm, from the qualitatively different composition of the communities of the Neogene Arctic, to those of the more southerly modern boreal region. These differences may be due to the warm climate of the Neogene Arctic combined with the long dark of polar winter – a phenomenon with no modern analogue. The differences highlight the need for a comprehensive understanding of species’ ecology to predict species ranges under near-future climate conditions analogous to our Neogene past. Many sites described here present rich opportunities for future cross-disciplinary study, including research related to the role of warm-climate intervals in patterning past and present Arctic ecosystems. T.L. Fletcher. Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Management, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, Liaoning 110164, China and College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59812, United States of America. drtlfletcher@gmail.com A. Telka. PALEOTEC Services – Quaternary and late Tertiary plant macrofossil and insect fossil analyses, 1-574 Somerset St. West, Ottawa, Ontario K1R 5K2, Canada. N. Rybczynski. Department of Palaeobiology, Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 6P4, FLETCHER ET AL.: ARCTIC MACROFLORA 2 Canada. nrybczynski@nature.ca and Department of Biology and Department of Earth Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada. nrybczynski@gmail.com J.V. Matthews, Jr. 1 Cricket Lane, Hubley, Nova Scotia B3Z 1A5, Canada.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palaeontologia Electronica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palaeontologia Electronica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26879/1121\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palaeontologia Electronica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26879/1121","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

提出了一个新的相关方案,主要涉及阿拉斯加和加拿大北部26个新近纪地点和50多个花区的苔藓植物和维管植物的大花和中花遗迹。植物区系对于关联北极新近纪遗址是有价值的,尤其是在无法使用绝对年代测定方法的情况下。这些分类群清楚地区分了北美北极地区的新近纪和第四纪沉积物。最近使用陆地宇宙成因核素(TCN)测年提供的年龄估计为这些相关性提供了联系点,并倾向于证实通过相对和相关方法获得的更早日期。我们对北美北极/亚北极古植物群和动物群的了解足够详细,可以进行区域间比较。本文首次尝试比较和对比整个环北极地区的上第三纪和更新世早期的大区系和中区系。亚化石和化石区系有助于了解北方地区的演变,从上第三纪北极群落的性质不同的组成,到更南的现代北方地区的群落。这些差异可能是由于新第三纪北极温暖的气候加上极地冬季漫长而黑暗——这是一种现代没有类似现象的现象。这些差异凸显了对物种生态学的全面理解的必要性,以预测在不久的将来类似于我们新第三纪过去的气候条件下的物种范围。这里描述的许多地点为未来的跨学科研究提供了丰富的机会,包括与温暖气候间隔在过去和现在北极生态系统模式中的作用有关的研究。T.L.弗莱彻。中国科学院应用生态学研究所森林生态与管理重点实验室,中国辽宁沈阳110164,美国蒙大拿州米苏拉市蒙大拿大学林业与保护学院59812。drtlfletcher@gmail.comA.Telka。PALEOTEC服务——第四纪和晚第三纪植物宏化石和昆虫化石分析,加拿大安大略省渥太华萨默塞特街1-574号K1R 5K2。N.Rybczynski。加拿大自然博物馆古生物学系,安大略省渥太华K1P 6P4,FLETCHER ET AL.:ARCTIC MACROFLORA 2 Canada。nrybczynski@nature.ca加拿大安大略省渥太华市卡尔顿大学生物系和地球科学系K1S 5B6。nrybczynski@gmail.comJ.V.Matthews,Jr.1 Cricket Lane,Hubley,Nova Scotia B3Z 1A5,Canada。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neogene and early Pleistocene flora from Alaska and Arctic/Subarctic Canada: New data, intercontinental comparisons and correlations
A new correlation scheme primarily concerning macroand meso-floral remains of bryophytes and vascular plants from 26 Neogene sites and over 50 florules in Alaska and northern Canada is presented. Flora are valuable for correlating Arctic Neogene sites, especially where absolute dating methods are not possible. These taxa clearly differentiate Neogene from Quaternary deposits in the North American Arctic. Recent age estimates provided using terrestrial cosmogenic nuclide (TCN) dating provide tiepoints for these correlations and tend to confirm earlier dates achieved by relative and correlative methods. Our knowledge of North American Arctic/Subarctic palaeofloras and faunas is sufficiently detailed to allow inter-regional comparisons. This paper contains the first attempt to compare and contrast Neogene and early Pleistocene macroand meso-floras from the entire circum-Arctic region. The subfossil and fossil floras are valuable for understanding the evolution of the boreal realm, from the qualitatively different composition of the communities of the Neogene Arctic, to those of the more southerly modern boreal region. These differences may be due to the warm climate of the Neogene Arctic combined with the long dark of polar winter – a phenomenon with no modern analogue. The differences highlight the need for a comprehensive understanding of species’ ecology to predict species ranges under near-future climate conditions analogous to our Neogene past. Many sites described here present rich opportunities for future cross-disciplinary study, including research related to the role of warm-climate intervals in patterning past and present Arctic ecosystems. T.L. Fletcher. Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Management, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, Liaoning 110164, China and College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59812, United States of America. drtlfletcher@gmail.com A. Telka. PALEOTEC Services – Quaternary and late Tertiary plant macrofossil and insect fossil analyses, 1-574 Somerset St. West, Ottawa, Ontario K1R 5K2, Canada. N. Rybczynski. Department of Palaeobiology, Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 6P4, FLETCHER ET AL.: ARCTIC MACROFLORA 2 Canada. nrybczynski@nature.ca and Department of Biology and Department of Earth Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada. nrybczynski@gmail.com J.V. Matthews, Jr. 1 Cricket Lane, Hubley, Nova Scotia B3Z 1A5, Canada.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palaeontologia Electronica
Palaeontologia Electronica 地学-古生物学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Founded in 1997, Palaeontologia Electronica (PE) is the longest running open-access, peer-reviewed electronic journal and covers all aspects of palaeontology. PE uses an external double-blind peer review system for all manuscripts. Copyright of scientific papers is held by one of the three sponsoring professional societies at the author''s choice. Reviews, commentaries, and other material is placed in the public domain. PE papers comply with regulations for taxonomic nomenclature established in the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature and the International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信