流行性迷魂药

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM
Anjuli Fatima Raza Kolb
{"title":"流行性迷魂药","authors":"Anjuli Fatima Raza Kolb","doi":"10.1017/pli.2021.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The week I received these four beautiful articles moving out from and through Epidemic Empire was also the week during which India’s COVID-19 case count flew past all previous pandemic records. At the time of writing, daily infection rates have hovered in the mid-300,000s for more than a week, following a peak of 414,188 on May 7, 2021. Twenty-four million total cases have been counted, and at least 260,000 people have died.1 The scenes of anguish are familiar to us now, amplified by the exoticist horror of the English-languagemedia, both in India and abroad: patients die alone on the sidewalk outside inadequate and overwhelmed and hospitals, waiting for a bed, struggling to breathe. Some say these estimates are as little as an eighth of the real numbers. Hundreds of thousands more are believed to be suffering and dying far from COVID testing sites, and hospitals in the rural areas of Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, and West Bengal.2 Others are dying at home, untested and uncounted. Oxygen and ventilators are in such short supply that hospitals are instructing patients to bring their own tanks, and a black market in oxygen is flourishing, something medical anthropologist Paul Farmer warned about in a brief editorial I shared with my students in a course called Public Writing and Public Health just a few weeks ago.3 I told those students—practicing nurses, doctors, public health advocates, and social workers—that their expertise mattered. That to write well about science is as much about observation and humility as it is about pitching timely stories and crafting beautiful sentences. That to supplement the work of the clinic with the skills of the critic was their responsibility. In the era of Trump and Modi, we have needed to say “Listen to the science,” but this, too, is a","PeriodicalId":42913,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epidemic Ecstasy\",\"authors\":\"Anjuli Fatima Raza Kolb\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/pli.2021.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The week I received these four beautiful articles moving out from and through Epidemic Empire was also the week during which India’s COVID-19 case count flew past all previous pandemic records. At the time of writing, daily infection rates have hovered in the mid-300,000s for more than a week, following a peak of 414,188 on May 7, 2021. Twenty-four million total cases have been counted, and at least 260,000 people have died.1 The scenes of anguish are familiar to us now, amplified by the exoticist horror of the English-languagemedia, both in India and abroad: patients die alone on the sidewalk outside inadequate and overwhelmed and hospitals, waiting for a bed, struggling to breathe. Some say these estimates are as little as an eighth of the real numbers. Hundreds of thousands more are believed to be suffering and dying far from COVID testing sites, and hospitals in the rural areas of Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, and West Bengal.2 Others are dying at home, untested and uncounted. Oxygen and ventilators are in such short supply that hospitals are instructing patients to bring their own tanks, and a black market in oxygen is flourishing, something medical anthropologist Paul Farmer warned about in a brief editorial I shared with my students in a course called Public Writing and Public Health just a few weeks ago.3 I told those students—practicing nurses, doctors, public health advocates, and social workers—that their expertise mattered. That to write well about science is as much about observation and humility as it is about pitching timely stories and crafting beautiful sentences. That to supplement the work of the clinic with the skills of the critic was their responsibility. In the era of Trump and Modi, we have needed to say “Listen to the science,” but this, too, is a\",\"PeriodicalId\":42913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/pli.2021.19\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pli.2021.19","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我收到这四篇美丽文章的那一周,也是印度新冠肺炎病例数超过此前所有疫情记录的那一天。在撰写本文时,每日感染率在2021年5月7日达到414188人的峰值后,已经在30万人左右徘徊了一周多。据统计,共有2400万例病例,至少26万人死亡。1现在,印度和国外的英语媒体的异国恐怖加剧了我们对痛苦的场景的熟悉:病人孤独地死在不足和不堪重负的外面的人行道上,医院在等床,呼吸困难。有人说,这些估计只有实际数字的八分之一。据信,在北方邦、中央邦、比哈尔邦和西孟加拉邦的农村地区,还有数十万人在远离新冠病毒检测点和医院的地方受苦和死亡。2其他人在家中死亡,未经检测,数量不详。几周前,医学人类学家保罗·法默在一篇名为《公共写作与公共卫生》的课程中与学生们分享了一篇简短的社论,他在社论中警告说,氧气和呼吸机供应短缺,医院正在指示患者自带氧气罐,氧气黑市正在蓬勃发展,公共卫生倡导者和社会工作者——他们的专业知识很重要。写好关于科学的文章,既要有观察力和谦逊,也要有适时的故事和优美的句子。用评论家的技能来补充诊所的工作是他们的责任。在特朗普和莫迪时代,我们需要说“倾听科学”,但这也是一个
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Epidemic Ecstasy
The week I received these four beautiful articles moving out from and through Epidemic Empire was also the week during which India’s COVID-19 case count flew past all previous pandemic records. At the time of writing, daily infection rates have hovered in the mid-300,000s for more than a week, following a peak of 414,188 on May 7, 2021. Twenty-four million total cases have been counted, and at least 260,000 people have died.1 The scenes of anguish are familiar to us now, amplified by the exoticist horror of the English-languagemedia, both in India and abroad: patients die alone on the sidewalk outside inadequate and overwhelmed and hospitals, waiting for a bed, struggling to breathe. Some say these estimates are as little as an eighth of the real numbers. Hundreds of thousands more are believed to be suffering and dying far from COVID testing sites, and hospitals in the rural areas of Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, and West Bengal.2 Others are dying at home, untested and uncounted. Oxygen and ventilators are in such short supply that hospitals are instructing patients to bring their own tanks, and a black market in oxygen is flourishing, something medical anthropologist Paul Farmer warned about in a brief editorial I shared with my students in a course called Public Writing and Public Health just a few weeks ago.3 I told those students—practicing nurses, doctors, public health advocates, and social workers—that their expertise mattered. That to write well about science is as much about observation and humility as it is about pitching timely stories and crafting beautiful sentences. That to supplement the work of the clinic with the skills of the critic was their responsibility. In the era of Trump and Modi, we have needed to say “Listen to the science,” but this, too, is a
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信