{"title":"心理学家对评估和治疗创伤暴露客户的看法","authors":"Shufan Wang, L. Schramm, E. Berger","doi":"10.1080/00050067.2022.2120381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective Psychologists are primary care professionals responsible for providing treatment to people exposed to trauma. However, there has been limited research exploring psychologists’ perceptions of their practice and trauma-informed care when treating people exposed to trauma. The current study aimed to investigate: 1) psychologists’ perceptions of assessing and treating trauma-exposed clients; and 2) psychologists’ perceptions of trauma-informed practice and their need for further training in this area. Method Surveys were completed by 99 psychologists, and the data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results Psychologists reported the importance of further trauma-related training and showed an inconsistent understanding of trauma-informed practice. Conclusions Changes in tertiary education for psychologists were recommended to assist future psychologists to develop competency and confidence in assessing and treating trauma-exposed clients. It was also recommended that psychologists with insufficient knowledge in this field to undertake further training in this area. Key Points What is already known about this topic: (1) Psychologists are primary care professionals responsible for diagnosing and treating clients exposed to trauma. (2) Working with trauma-exposed clients presents a burden for psychologists in terms of their mental health and wellbeing. (3) There is limited Australian and international research concerning the experiences and needs of psychologists when assessing and treating trauma-exposed clients. What this topic adds: (1) This study demonstrated Australian psychologists’ mixed knowledge and confidence when assessing and treating clients exposed to trauma. (2) Mixed understanding of trauma-informed care and ways to implement trauma-informed practice were also presented. (3) More professional development for some psychologists is recommended regarding assessing and treating trauma, and regarding trauma-informed practice.","PeriodicalId":47679,"journal":{"name":"Australian Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychologists’ perceptions of assessing and treating trauma-exposed clients\",\"authors\":\"Shufan Wang, L. Schramm, E. Berger\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00050067.2022.2120381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Objective Psychologists are primary care professionals responsible for providing treatment to people exposed to trauma. However, there has been limited research exploring psychologists’ perceptions of their practice and trauma-informed care when treating people exposed to trauma. The current study aimed to investigate: 1) psychologists’ perceptions of assessing and treating trauma-exposed clients; and 2) psychologists’ perceptions of trauma-informed practice and their need for further training in this area. Method Surveys were completed by 99 psychologists, and the data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results Psychologists reported the importance of further trauma-related training and showed an inconsistent understanding of trauma-informed practice. Conclusions Changes in tertiary education for psychologists were recommended to assist future psychologists to develop competency and confidence in assessing and treating trauma-exposed clients. It was also recommended that psychologists with insufficient knowledge in this field to undertake further training in this area. Key Points What is already known about this topic: (1) Psychologists are primary care professionals responsible for diagnosing and treating clients exposed to trauma. (2) Working with trauma-exposed clients presents a burden for psychologists in terms of their mental health and wellbeing. (3) There is limited Australian and international research concerning the experiences and needs of psychologists when assessing and treating trauma-exposed clients. What this topic adds: (1) This study demonstrated Australian psychologists’ mixed knowledge and confidence when assessing and treating clients exposed to trauma. (2) Mixed understanding of trauma-informed care and ways to implement trauma-informed practice were also presented. (3) More professional development for some psychologists is recommended regarding assessing and treating trauma, and regarding trauma-informed practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Psychologist\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Psychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00050067.2022.2120381\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00050067.2022.2120381","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Psychologists’ perceptions of assessing and treating trauma-exposed clients
ABSTRACT Objective Psychologists are primary care professionals responsible for providing treatment to people exposed to trauma. However, there has been limited research exploring psychologists’ perceptions of their practice and trauma-informed care when treating people exposed to trauma. The current study aimed to investigate: 1) psychologists’ perceptions of assessing and treating trauma-exposed clients; and 2) psychologists’ perceptions of trauma-informed practice and their need for further training in this area. Method Surveys were completed by 99 psychologists, and the data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results Psychologists reported the importance of further trauma-related training and showed an inconsistent understanding of trauma-informed practice. Conclusions Changes in tertiary education for psychologists were recommended to assist future psychologists to develop competency and confidence in assessing and treating trauma-exposed clients. It was also recommended that psychologists with insufficient knowledge in this field to undertake further training in this area. Key Points What is already known about this topic: (1) Psychologists are primary care professionals responsible for diagnosing and treating clients exposed to trauma. (2) Working with trauma-exposed clients presents a burden for psychologists in terms of their mental health and wellbeing. (3) There is limited Australian and international research concerning the experiences and needs of psychologists when assessing and treating trauma-exposed clients. What this topic adds: (1) This study demonstrated Australian psychologists’ mixed knowledge and confidence when assessing and treating clients exposed to trauma. (2) Mixed understanding of trauma-informed care and ways to implement trauma-informed practice were also presented. (3) More professional development for some psychologists is recommended regarding assessing and treating trauma, and regarding trauma-informed practice.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Psychologist is the official applied practice and public policy journal of the Australian Psychological Society. As such, the journal solicits articles covering current issues in psychology, the science and practice of psychology, and psychology"s contribution to public policy, with particular emphasis on the Australian context. Periodically, Australian Psychological Society documents, including but not limited to, position papers, reports of the Society, ethics information, surveys of the membership, announcements, and selected award addresses may appear in the journal.