不同体位CT检查对评价腹壁切口疝容量的影响

Q4 Medicine
Z. Hou, Zhi-peng Jiang, Wenli Li, Wei Liu, Ying-ru Li, Taicheng Zhou, W. Gan, Shuang Chen
{"title":"不同体位CT检查对评价腹壁切口疝容量的影响","authors":"Z. Hou, Zhi-peng Jiang, Wenli Li, Wei Liu, Ying-ru Li, Taicheng Zhou, W. Gan, Shuang Chen","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-9752.2019.11.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the effects of computed tomography (CT) examination in different body positions on the evaluation of abdominal incisional hernia volume. \n \n \nMethods \nThe retrospective case-control study was conducted. The clinical data of 23 patients with abdominal incisional hernia who were admitted to the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from February to September in 2017 were collected. There were 14 males and 9 females, aged from 47 to 75 years, with an average age of 63 years. All patients underwent CT scan in supine position and lateral position. The volume of hernia sac, abdominal cavity and the volume ratio of hernia sac to abdominal cavity in different body positions were measured by multi-planar reconstruction and volume reappearance on the workstation. Observation indicators: (1) situations of CT examination of patients with abdominal incisional hernia in different positions; (2) correlation analysis of volume ratio increment of hernia sac to abdominal cavity between different positions by CT examination in patients with abdominal incisional hernia. Measurement data with normal distribution were expressed as Mean±SD, and comparison between groups was performed using the pared t test. Count data were expressed as absolute numbers or percentages. Pearson correlation was used to analyze the volume ratio increment of hernia sac to abdominal cavity between different positions by CT examination in patients with abdominal incisional hernia. \n \n \nResults \n(1) Situations of CT examination of patients with abdominal incisional hernia in different positions: CT examination of 23 patients with abdominal incisional hernia showed that the contents of hernia increased and the abdominal wall deformed in the lateral position compared with conventional supine position, with manifestations as shortened abdominal transverse diameter and longer vertical diameter. The volume of the hernia sac in supine position and in lateral position by CT examination was (623±293)mL and (869±425)mL, respectively, showing a significant difference (t=-7.959, P<0.05). The volume of abdominal cavity in supine position and in lateral position by CT examination was (6 445±1 438)mL and (6 283±1 348)mL, respectively, showing a significant difference (t=2.762, P<0.05). The volume ratio of hernia sac to abdominal cavity in supine position and in lateral position by CT examination was 0.096±0.040 and 0.138±0.061, showing a significant difference (t=-8.093, P<0.05). The volume ratio of hernia sac to abdominal cavity in lateral position increased by 0.042 compared with that in supine position, with an increasing rate of 43.8%. All the 23 patients had volume ratio of hernia sac to abdominal cavity less than 20% in supine position by CT examination, however, 4 patients had volume ratio of hernia sac to abdominal cavity more than 20% in lateral position by CT examination. (2) Correlation analysis of volume ratio increment of hernia sac to abdominal cavity between different positions by CT examination in patients with abdominal incisional hernia: results of Pearson correlation analysis showed a positive correlation of volume ratio of hernia sac to abdominal cavity between supine position and lateral position by CT examination (r=0.742, P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nThe volume of incisional hernia is influenced by different body positions. Compared with supine position, lateral position by CT examination has a more accurate reflection of abdominal incisional hernia. \n \n \nKey words: \nHernia; Incisional hernia; Body position; Computed tomography, X-ray; Hernia sac volume; Abdominal cavity volume; Volume ratio","PeriodicalId":36400,"journal":{"name":"中华消化外科杂志","volume":"18 1","pages":"1075-1079"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of CT examination in different body positions on the evaluation of abdominal incisional hernia volume\",\"authors\":\"Z. Hou, Zhi-peng Jiang, Wenli Li, Wei Liu, Ying-ru Li, Taicheng Zhou, W. Gan, Shuang Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-9752.2019.11.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo investigate the effects of computed tomography (CT) examination in different body positions on the evaluation of abdominal incisional hernia volume. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nThe retrospective case-control study was conducted. The clinical data of 23 patients with abdominal incisional hernia who were admitted to the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from February to September in 2017 were collected. There were 14 males and 9 females, aged from 47 to 75 years, with an average age of 63 years. All patients underwent CT scan in supine position and lateral position. The volume of hernia sac, abdominal cavity and the volume ratio of hernia sac to abdominal cavity in different body positions were measured by multi-planar reconstruction and volume reappearance on the workstation. Observation indicators: (1) situations of CT examination of patients with abdominal incisional hernia in different positions; (2) correlation analysis of volume ratio increment of hernia sac to abdominal cavity between different positions by CT examination in patients with abdominal incisional hernia. Measurement data with normal distribution were expressed as Mean±SD, and comparison between groups was performed using the pared t test. Count data were expressed as absolute numbers or percentages. Pearson correlation was used to analyze the volume ratio increment of hernia sac to abdominal cavity between different positions by CT examination in patients with abdominal incisional hernia. \\n \\n \\nResults \\n(1) Situations of CT examination of patients with abdominal incisional hernia in different positions: CT examination of 23 patients with abdominal incisional hernia showed that the contents of hernia increased and the abdominal wall deformed in the lateral position compared with conventional supine position, with manifestations as shortened abdominal transverse diameter and longer vertical diameter. The volume of the hernia sac in supine position and in lateral position by CT examination was (623±293)mL and (869±425)mL, respectively, showing a significant difference (t=-7.959, P<0.05). The volume of abdominal cavity in supine position and in lateral position by CT examination was (6 445±1 438)mL and (6 283±1 348)mL, respectively, showing a significant difference (t=2.762, P<0.05). The volume ratio of hernia sac to abdominal cavity in supine position and in lateral position by CT examination was 0.096±0.040 and 0.138±0.061, showing a significant difference (t=-8.093, P<0.05). The volume ratio of hernia sac to abdominal cavity in lateral position increased by 0.042 compared with that in supine position, with an increasing rate of 43.8%. All the 23 patients had volume ratio of hernia sac to abdominal cavity less than 20% in supine position by CT examination, however, 4 patients had volume ratio of hernia sac to abdominal cavity more than 20% in lateral position by CT examination. (2) Correlation analysis of volume ratio increment of hernia sac to abdominal cavity between different positions by CT examination in patients with abdominal incisional hernia: results of Pearson correlation analysis showed a positive correlation of volume ratio of hernia sac to abdominal cavity between supine position and lateral position by CT examination (r=0.742, P<0.05). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nThe volume of incisional hernia is influenced by different body positions. Compared with supine position, lateral position by CT examination has a more accurate reflection of abdominal incisional hernia. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nHernia; Incisional hernia; Body position; Computed tomography, X-ray; Hernia sac volume; Abdominal cavity volume; Volume ratio\",\"PeriodicalId\":36400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华消化外科杂志\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"1075-1079\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华消化外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-9752.2019.11.014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华消化外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-9752.2019.11.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨不同体位的计算机断层扫描(CT)检查对评价腹部切口疝容量的影响。方法采用回顾性病例对照研究。收集中山大学附属第六医院2017年2月至9月收治的23例腹壁切口疝患者的临床资料。共有14名男性和9名女性,年龄从47岁到75岁,平均年龄为63岁。所有患者均采用仰卧位和侧卧位进行CT扫描。在工作站上通过多平面重建和体积再现测量不同体位的疝囊体积、腹腔体积以及疝囊与腹腔体积比。观察指标:(1)腹部切口疝不同部位CT检查情况;(2) 腹部切口疝CT检查不同位置疝囊与腹腔容积比增量的相关性分析。具有正态分布的测量数据表示为Mean±SD,并使用对比试验进行组间比较。计数数据用绝对数或百分比表示。应用Pearson相关分析腹部切口疝患者CT检查不同位置疝囊与腹腔容积比的增量。结果(1)不同体位腹部切口疝的CT检查情况:23例腹部切口疝患者的CT检查显示,与传统仰卧位相比,表现为腹部横径缩短、纵径延长。CT检查仰卧位和侧卧位疝囊容积分别为(623±293)mL和(869±425)mL,差异有统计学意义(t=-7.959,P<0.05),CT检查仰卧位和侧位疝囊与腹腔容积比分别为0.096±0.040和0.138±0.061,差异有统计学意义(t=-8.093,P<0.05),23例患者仰卧位疝囊与腹腔容积比均小于20%,而4例患者侧卧位疝囊和腹腔容积比大于20%。(2) 腹部切口疝患者CT检查不同位置疝囊与腹腔容积比增量的相关性分析:Pearson相关分析结果显示,CT检查仰卧位与侧卧位疝囊与腹膜容积比呈正相关(r=0.742,P<0.05)切口疝的体积受体位的影响。与仰卧位相比,侧位CT检查能更准确地反映腹壁切口疝。关键词:疝;切口疝;身体姿势;计算机断层扫描,X射线;疝囊容积;腹腔容积;体积比
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of CT examination in different body positions on the evaluation of abdominal incisional hernia volume
Objective To investigate the effects of computed tomography (CT) examination in different body positions on the evaluation of abdominal incisional hernia volume. Methods The retrospective case-control study was conducted. The clinical data of 23 patients with abdominal incisional hernia who were admitted to the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from February to September in 2017 were collected. There were 14 males and 9 females, aged from 47 to 75 years, with an average age of 63 years. All patients underwent CT scan in supine position and lateral position. The volume of hernia sac, abdominal cavity and the volume ratio of hernia sac to abdominal cavity in different body positions were measured by multi-planar reconstruction and volume reappearance on the workstation. Observation indicators: (1) situations of CT examination of patients with abdominal incisional hernia in different positions; (2) correlation analysis of volume ratio increment of hernia sac to abdominal cavity between different positions by CT examination in patients with abdominal incisional hernia. Measurement data with normal distribution were expressed as Mean±SD, and comparison between groups was performed using the pared t test. Count data were expressed as absolute numbers or percentages. Pearson correlation was used to analyze the volume ratio increment of hernia sac to abdominal cavity between different positions by CT examination in patients with abdominal incisional hernia. Results (1) Situations of CT examination of patients with abdominal incisional hernia in different positions: CT examination of 23 patients with abdominal incisional hernia showed that the contents of hernia increased and the abdominal wall deformed in the lateral position compared with conventional supine position, with manifestations as shortened abdominal transverse diameter and longer vertical diameter. The volume of the hernia sac in supine position and in lateral position by CT examination was (623±293)mL and (869±425)mL, respectively, showing a significant difference (t=-7.959, P<0.05). The volume of abdominal cavity in supine position and in lateral position by CT examination was (6 445±1 438)mL and (6 283±1 348)mL, respectively, showing a significant difference (t=2.762, P<0.05). The volume ratio of hernia sac to abdominal cavity in supine position and in lateral position by CT examination was 0.096±0.040 and 0.138±0.061, showing a significant difference (t=-8.093, P<0.05). The volume ratio of hernia sac to abdominal cavity in lateral position increased by 0.042 compared with that in supine position, with an increasing rate of 43.8%. All the 23 patients had volume ratio of hernia sac to abdominal cavity less than 20% in supine position by CT examination, however, 4 patients had volume ratio of hernia sac to abdominal cavity more than 20% in lateral position by CT examination. (2) Correlation analysis of volume ratio increment of hernia sac to abdominal cavity between different positions by CT examination in patients with abdominal incisional hernia: results of Pearson correlation analysis showed a positive correlation of volume ratio of hernia sac to abdominal cavity between supine position and lateral position by CT examination (r=0.742, P<0.05). Conclusions The volume of incisional hernia is influenced by different body positions. Compared with supine position, lateral position by CT examination has a more accurate reflection of abdominal incisional hernia. Key words: Hernia; Incisional hernia; Body position; Computed tomography, X-ray; Hernia sac volume; Abdominal cavity volume; Volume ratio
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华消化外科杂志
中华消化外科杂志 Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4544
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信